Advice? Light Beginner Travel Kit -- zoom + prime or two primes?

wibblywobbly

New to Mu-43
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
3
Hi everyone!

I've been reading quite a few threads here the past few weeks to get acquainted with the micro four thirds system and I've learned so much! You are all so helpful! This will be my first foray into the non-P&S camera world, so as you can imagine, I could use a lot of advice :redface: So a little bit about myself: I'm planning on traveling for a 3-4 months next year before starting grad school, and since I'm pretty new to photography, I thought I'd get a head start in learning and practicing before leaving.

I'll be going for the EM10 in terms of the body, but while I know I want a compact setup that's compatible with student-budget backpacking (i.e. cheap hostels, all luggage with me at all times, etc), I'm completely torn on how to approach the lenses. I'm taking a gap year and living/working in Seoul at the moment, which means while I'm on a budget, it seems most lenses are more affordable here.

Based on what I've read so far, I've narrowed down my choices to these:
14-42mm EZ ($200 -- same price whether in kit or not)
12-32mm ($225)
17/1.8 ($350)
25/1.8 ($375)
45/1.8 ($250)

My budget is around $1000, and given the EM10 goes for $520 here, I have room to buy two lenses. So here are the options I've thought through:
1. Compact zoom + 45/1.8 since the longer focal length isn't included in the zoom range.
2. Compact zoom + 17/1.8 since the "normal" lens will be more useful in every day shooting and to practice with.
3. Body + two primes (most likely 17/1.8 and 45/1.8) since I'll probably want to transition to a set of primes in the future anyways.
4. Other suggestions??

So the question is, which option, and if option #1 or #2, which compact zoom?

The reason I've included the 17/1.8 over the 25/1.8 in the options above is that I'm guessing a slightly wider lens will be more useful when traveling and it feels like I'm getting a better "deal" with the 17/1.8 because of the discount compared to US prices. I'd love to hear arguments for the 25/1.8 or other lenses (maybe something wider than the 17? The 14/2.5 goes for $185 here), however!

Something I've noticed is that I rarely zoom -- not when I had a P&S, when I'm snapping pictures with my phone, or when I was borrowing a friend's NEX6 with the kit zoom -- including when I've travelled in the past. I'm not sure if it's just laziness or if I'm more comfortable with wider angles, but if I can't get the "image" that's in my mind's eye with the default FOV, I just move on. Since I'm new to all this, I'm curious whether learning to use zoom is an important skill. If it is, I'll obviously opt for options #1 or #2, but if it's not, I'm leaning towards option #3. I'm also curious whether people have a preference for one of the zooms over the other. I'm torn between getting the EZ to stay consistent brand-wise vs going for the extra 2mm. Any arguments for either?

Thanks so much!


PS. Since I have a bit of time before I really "need" a complete setup, should I wait until next year for the new Olympus body? I'm guessing it will lead to some discounts on the current bodies, and if the new model is something like an EM10 with weather-sealing, I might consider that instead. Is this worth it or should I just get out there and start shooting?
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
If your current P&S is has a zoom lens, download this software: http://www.vandel.nl/exposureplot.html, and use it to analyse the most frequent focal lengths that you use. That will at least give you a starting point. No one can really advise you what is best for 'you', all advice will be tainted by personal preference.
 

gryphon1911

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
3,759
Location
Central Ohio, USA
Real Name
Andrew
Honestly,

I would get the Oly 17/1.8, 45/1.8 and the 40-150/4-5.6 and call it a day.
So much latitude with that kit.

If you need wider and don't want to spend a bunch, check out the Oly 9mm f/8 body cap lens.
 

demiro

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
2,740
Location
northeast US
First off, welcome aboard.

As much as I prefer primes, and the 17/1.8 & 45/1.8 combo, I think in your shoes I might go for the 12-32 + 25/1.8 combo. The 12-32 would be my choice because I think the 24mm FL will be more valuable than the extra reach with the 14-42. The 25/1.8 because it gives you decent versatility for a prime. Good for low light; can work for portraits; good general use FL.

The other thing to consider is the not yet released Panasonic LX100. $900 for a 24-75mm f/1.8-2.8 lens. Can't beat the versatility, but I'd certainly wait for early users to report any issues and provide some definitive idea of image quality. Given that you are talking about building a system, a fixed lens camera makes little sense, but if the LX100 is as good as specs sound it will be an awesome travel camera.
 

wibblywobbly

New to Mu-43
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
3
If your current P&S is has a zoom lens, download this software: http://www.vandel.nl/exposureplot.html, and use it to analyse the most frequent focal lengths that you use. That will at least give you a starting point. No one can really advise you what is best for 'you', all advice will be tainted by personal preference.
Thanks for the suggestion! I have the Panasonic ZS3, which is widest at 25mm, and have used the NEX6 with the kit lens at 24mm (never zoomed with either), but my phones have been 30mm and 35mm (which I had to use when I lost of ZS3's charger during a longer trip). Maybe I just have no sense for what focal length works for what kind of shot :tongue: I've got a lot to learn!


Honestly,

I would get the Oly 17/1.8, 45/1.8 and the 40-150/4-5.6 and call it a day.
So much latitude with that kit.

If you need wider and don't want to spend a bunch, check out the Oly 9mm f/8 body cap lens.
I've seen the 40-150, but I'm really trying for something compact, since I'll be traveling with one overly-stuffed backpack the entire time. I'll definitely check out the body cap lens though! Looks neat!


First off, welcome aboard.

As much as I prefer primes, and the 17/1.8 & 45/1.8 combo, I think in your shoes I might go for the 12-32 + 25/1.8 combo. The 12-32 would be my choice because I think the 24mm FL will be more valuable than the extra reach with the 14-42. The 25/1.8 because it gives you decent versatility for a prime. Good for low light; can work for portraits; good general use FL.

The other thing to consider is the not yet released Panasonic LX100. $900 for a 24-75mm f/1.8-2.8 lens. Can't beat the versatility, but I'd certainly wait for early users to report any issues and provide some definitive idea of image quality. Given that you are talking about building a system, a fixed lens camera makes little sense, but if the LX100 is as good as specs sound it will be an awesome travel camera.

Thanks for the welcome! That's actually a very compelling argument for the 12-32 + 25. I was leaning towards the 17 because though I'm unfamiliar with different focal lengths, it seemed like I had been most exposed to the normal/wide range and would be more comfortable there -- I'll have to see if I can get used to the 25mm though! I'll try to borrow the NEX6 again and use it at the 50mm equivalent.
 

barry13

Mu-43.com Editor
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
9,142
Location
Southern California
Real Name
Barry
Hi,

What do you like to photograph?

I was just in Seoul a couple weeks ago; I took a LOT of street pictures (people mostly), including nighttime.
If you want to do street, esp. at night, the Oly 17mm f1.8 is an excellent choice. Something even faster would be better at night but there aren't a lot of faster choices, esp. small and with A/F.

The next new Oly OM-D is expected to be a successor to the E-M5.
The current E-M5 is weather sealed; I noticed it seems to rain a lot in Seoul; you might consider the current or new E-M5, with a weather sealed zoom such as the 12-50mm (which is also decent for macro but is not very small) or the 12-40mm Pro (expensive, heavier) or Pana 12-35mm.

Non weather sealed: the non-pancake 14-42mm lenses can be found second-hand for well under $100, often only slightly used. I think I've seen the Oly new as low as $125. The Oly is still quite compact and light.

My understanding is that WiFi is the main feature lacking on the current E-M5. Some vendors have been selling them at a big discount; look in the Deals section, there was one last week from a USA Oly dealer, new with zoom lens for $599.

Barry
 

edmsnap

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2011
Messages
461
Location
Edmonton, Alberta
My budget is around $1000, and given the EM10 goes for $520 here, I have room to buy two lenses. So here are the options I've thought through:
1. Compact zoom + 45/1.8 since the longer focal length isn't included in the zoom range.
2. Compact zoom + 17/1.8 since the "normal" lens will be more useful in every day shooting and to practice with.
3. Body + two primes (most likely 17/1.8 and 45/1.8) since I'll probably want to transition to a set of primes in the future anyways.

...I'm more comfortable with wider angles,
If you're comfortable with wider angles, what about the Olympus 9-18mm? I prefer wider angles for travel lenses - the 9-18 is great. That and the 45mm for low-light would pass your budget, but be a pretty killer low-weight kit.

Since I have a bit of time before I really "need" a complete setup, should I wait until next year for the new Olympus body?
If the kit is just for the trip, then it's a pretty big investment and you might want to consider that the P&S could meet your needs. If you're expanding into photography, then pull the trigger - why wait? There's lots of other things to photograph besides a future trip :smile:
 

brettmaxwell

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 8, 2012
Messages
358
I had the 17 and 45 on and EM5 for a long while, it's a fantastic kit. I would do that, or 14/25/45.
 

PMCC

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
132
IMHO the best course of action now is buying the EM10 with the 12-32 now. It would cover most you need focal length-wise. Then you have nearly a year to decide if 32mm is too short (and go 45mm or 60mm), or if you need more low light capacity /shadow DoF at your favorite FL.
 

AussiePhil

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
2,927
Location
Canberra, ACT, Aust
Real Name
Phil
Easy for backpacking - option 2 with the 14-42EZ normally attached to the camera as it is so compact and the 17,1.8 for nighttime shots.

I only own the O45 in the listed choices and whilst a great lens it's not the one i would take on your sort of trip. The zoom gets you daytime versatility with various focal lengths for different situations.

Cheers
 

SojiOkita

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
1,342
Location
France
I own both the Panasonic 12-32 and the Olympus 14-42 EZ, and in the end I only use the 12-32.
It feels right on the E-M10 and it has two major advantages for me over the 14-42 EZ: it is not an eletronic zoom + it starts at 12 mm.

I thought that the electronic zoom ring would not be a big deal, but it is (for me). The more I try to use the 14-42, the less I like it.
(and I don't like the fact the zoom expand/retract itself each time I put the camera on/off).

It's not about optical quality, because both are very decent kit lenses (12-32 is a little sharper, 14-42 a little more homogeneous at the wide end, and with less purple fringing).

I think the Panasonic 12-32 si nearly a perfect match for the E-M10 as a light kit lens.
 

nardoleo

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Messages
344
Location
Singapore
Real Name
Leo
I would recommend a zoom + the 17mm. Depending on you, but i realise that often when travelling i dont have the opportunity to change lens and a zoom really comes in handy.

The 17 is for the night and indoor shoots.
 

alex66

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
1,487
I will say that the 12-32 is far and away the lens that has exceeded expectations, I did not expect it to be nearly as good as it has turn out to be. So if you want a zoom and I would say they are very useful to have go for that one unless you go for one of the 2.8 zooms. I can say the 45 is a great little lens as is the 25 but I have not got the 17mm mentioned so can't pass judgement. If you find you eventually want a tele zoom the 12-32 had a partner lens that is coming on the market, looks small and could be a good choice.
 

CiaranCReilly

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2012
Messages
487
Location
Dublin
Real Name
Ciaran Reilly
I would get the Oly 17/1.8, 45/1.8 and the 40-150/4-5.6 and call it a day.
So much latitude with that kit.

If you need wider and don't want to spend a bunch, check out the Oly 9mm f/8 body cap lens.
I usually bring Panasonic 20/1.7 and Olympus 40-150 on travels, but have added the 9mm bodycap on my latest trip. These and a GX7 fit in a small Olympus Street Case and are very light and manageable. The Olympus 40-150 is really a very small lens in person, I'd definitely check it out for reach if you have any interest in wildlife along your trip

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Mu-43 mobile app
 

Edmunds

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
173
My advice is, do not underestimate the convenience of a normal zoom during travel.

I do sometimes travel with just primes, but since travel presents you with different types of picture taking opportunities, I have to change lenses constantly. As in CONSTANTLY. With capital letters.

Which lenses to take depends entirely on where you are going. City trips around Europe - don't go without a wide angle. SE Asia - a long portrait lens is excellent. Africa - a long telephoto, etc. Think about where you are going and what kind of shots you will take.

Also, the Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 is cheap and is a great compromise between the 17mm and 25mm FOVs. I have it and I am surprised by how often I use it.
 

listers_nz

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2013
Messages
313
Location
Christchurch, New Zealand
Real Name
Simon
I bought the 12-32mm to have a compact kit option, and to be honest I haven't really used it. My travel lens of choice is the Panasonic 14-140mm (new F3.5 version) - not small, but no bigger than the Oly 40-150. That plus the Oly 9-18mm (for the occasional wide shot) and the Pana 20mm (for low light) were the only lenses used on the last family holiday, despite taking the "full kit".
 

mattia

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
2,391
Location
The Netherlands
I'd say it depends on your destination, your photographic interests and your priorities. My 'minimum' kit for non-far away travel is a Sony RX100, my 'Normal' backpacking kit (i.e. going somewhere I've never been before, a little exotic, and exploring) is an E-M1, A7r, and a selection of lenses. If I'd have to choose a single lens it would be a normal zoom with 12mm at the wide end, because that suits my style. A single prime would be a 35mm FF equivalent (so a 17/1.8 in oly land).

As for overstuffed backpacks, maybe look into going a little more ultralight/taking along a little less stuff? I haven't been to hostels recently where a sleeping bag is an essential piece of travel kit, and I can live out of my F-Stop Loka for a month without trying to hard in warmer climates, and that's a 37 liter bag with the bottom third full of 5kg of camera gear, and another 7kg of non-camera stuff (2 pants, 3 T-shirts, 2 light shirts, a sweater and a lightweight waterproof, plus some socks/underpants don't weigh that much)...
 

davdenic

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
229
Location
Switzerland
Real Name
David D.
Whatever you buy my advice is: don't follow too strictly the rules enjoy your trip and have fun. :)
Sometimes using the wrong lens can give another point of view.
I really like for example shot with long tele in typical wide landscape views. Here for example at the Grand Canyon http://flic.kr/p/pnutHf
 

LowriderS10

Monkey with a camera.
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
2,482
Location
Canada
It really depends on your personal preference.

I have been shooting with a wide zoom + a fast prime as my travel kit for years and have gotten tons of great photos and very few missed ones out of it. I shoot with the 9-18 and the 45, but the 9-18 may be too wide for some.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom