Adapted Lens Image Thread

rloewy

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
May 5, 2014
Messages
8,119
Real Name
Ron
48793056406_ded10db268_o.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Kodak Ektar 25mm 1.4 @f=2.8
 

rloewy

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
May 5, 2014
Messages
8,119
Real Name
Ron
48823958791_d78d26ffd8_o.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Industar-61 52mm 2.8
 

rloewy

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
May 5, 2014
Messages
8,119
Real Name
Ron
48848368232_993e59423a_o.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Industar 61, 52mm 2.8 @f=5.6
 

Bytesmiths

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 23, 2017
Messages
2,198
Location
Courtenay, British Columbia, Canada
Real Name
Jan Steinman
Olympus OM Zuiko 50mm ƒ/1.2 with Metabones Speedbooster Ultra, for an effective 35mm ƒ/0.8.

Looks like I caught an airliner and a meteor. I think the "gappiness" in the lower right was due to clouds moving through.

The EXIF data says ten seconds, but this was a Live Composite shot over about 45 minutes. I looked through all the EXIF/IPTC data, and there doesn't seem to be any clue in there that this was a Live Composite shot. It would be nice if Olympus had stuffed some fields with things like total number of shots and total time.
_A240460.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Last edited:

rloewy

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
May 5, 2014
Messages
8,119
Real Name
Ron
48862092658_2b48be1899_o.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Brownie

Thread Killer Extraordinaire
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
5,306
Location
SE Michigan
Real Name
Tim
Bought some used stuff from a guy last week. One of the items was this Focal 135mm f/2.8 K mount.

48923991803_a80621df26_c.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
P1046977 by telecast, on Flickr

I wasn't paying a lot of attention to it or the other Pentax stuff because I was mainly after the Argus 3C in the lot. When I got it all home I found the 135 has had the aperture blades removed. Maybe someone can tell me the purpose of this. I thought I'd mount it to the G9 and see what it'd do. I probably should've cleaned it first.

48924728607_52d03b4e68_c.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
P1046967 by telecast, on Flickr

Backlit Silver Dollar pods

48924529241_6b029357cd_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
P1046963 by telecast, on Flickr

Holy Bokeh! and what's with the rainbow?

48924527971_953fdd56e6_c.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
P1046968 by telecast, on Flickr

My dog's ear, indoor natural light from about 6' away.

48923992743_7643fea989_c.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
P1046973 by telecast, on Flickr
 

Brownie

Thread Killer Extraordinaire
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
5,306
Location
SE Michigan
Real Name
Tim
Maybe they were bent or oily and the previous owner couldn't figure out how to get them back together.
I've got a 28 or 35mm lens like that.
Thanks. I thought maybe no blades would be wider than open blades and it'd make the lens faster, but I checked it against another 2.8 and it's still right around where it should be.
 

dbuckle

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
5,230
Location
Smithville Ontario Canada
Real Name
David Buckle

Attachments

  • 48964752392_ab5cd5b6b8_h.jpg
    48964752392_ab5cd5b6b8_h.jpg
    389.3 KB · Views: 147
Last edited:

rloewy

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
May 5, 2014
Messages
8,119
Real Name
Ron
49001401428_b6a810f2c7_o.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Industar 61 52mm 2.8
 

Latest threads

Top Bottom