A second f1.2 prime coming soon?

Discussion in 'Micro 4/3 News and Rumors' started by pdk42, Aug 19, 2016.

  1. pdk42

    pdk42 One of the "Eh?" team

    Jan 11, 2013
    Leamington Spa, UK
    • Like Like x 1
  2. pdk42

    pdk42 One of the "Eh?" team

    Jan 11, 2013
    Leamington Spa, UK
    Actually, if it comes in at much more than £700 / $900 then I'll probably give it a miss until used ones come available.
     
  3. Turbofrog

    Turbofrog Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Mar 21, 2014
    So you'll be giving it a miss until used ones come available, I guess. ;) 
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  4. astrostl

    astrostl Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    538
    Oct 4, 2014
    St. Louis, MO
    Justin Honold
    Would bet on a 45 before a 17, even though the only premium near the 17mm MFT FL is the Voigtlander. Dem portraits.
     
  5. pdk42

    pdk42 One of the "Eh?" team

    Jan 11, 2013
    Leamington Spa, UK
    Yea - I guess so :) 
     
  6. spatulaboy

    spatulaboy I'm not really here Subscribing Member

    Jul 13, 2011
    North Carolina
    Vin
    It might be a Nocticron killer. But that focal range is way over crowded!
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  7. pdk42

    pdk42 One of the "Eh?" team

    Jan 11, 2013
    Leamington Spa, UK
    You're not kidding:
    - Oly 45/1.8
    - Pana 42/1.7
    - Pana 42/1.2
    - Pana 45/2.8 macro
    - Voigtlander 42/0.95
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. pake

    pake Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Oct 14, 2010
    Finland
    Teemu
    Something wider than 12mm and I'll buy one no matter what.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  9. astrostl

    astrostl Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    538
    Oct 4, 2014
    St. Louis, MO
    Justin Honold
    - Oly 25/1.8
    - Pana 25/1.7
    - Pana 25/1.4
    - Voigtlander 25/0.95

    It's a mature system, it's all pretty crowded at this point :)  I suppose if I were picking around there, I might make it a 20 rather than a 25.
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  10. kajunito

    kajunito Mu-43 Regular

    54
    Nov 6, 2012
    Amsterdam
    Luis
    Do not forget the Mitakon Speedmaster f0.95 25mm :) 
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Speedliner

    Speedliner Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Mar 2, 2015
    Southern NJ, USA
    Rob
    At this point with MFT if saturation is a discouragement there wouldn't be many new MFT lenses. I'm guessing it has to share a lot with the 25mm, 1.2 in order to make production sense and will be close. So maybe a 17?

    Who knows. In still hoping to see native f2 zooms and telephotos.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  12. speedy

    speedy Mu-43 Top Veteran

    657
    Nov 27, 2015
    Indeed. I'd buy an f/1.8-2 wide/normal zoom. I have no zooms currently, but that would definitely tempt me.
     
  13. GBarrington

    GBarrington Mu-43 Top Veteran

    To quote a former US presidential candidate, something like that would be 'YOUGE!'! Both in the news and chatter it generated and in the size and weight, I suspect. It would certainly be a controversial entry I would think.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. EarthQuake

    EarthQuake Mu-43 Top Veteran

    916
    Sep 30, 2013
    A 17/1.2 would be cool. Wider than that and I have very little interest. At 12mm or wider I typically shoot at F4-8 anyway.

    A 45/1.2 would be welcome for some I'm sure but I've got the 42.5/1.2 already, so, meh.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. oloap

    oloap Mu-43 Regular

    52
    May 22, 2013
    Switzerland
    I hope it is something between 60mm and 65mm. I love the 75mm, but sometimes I find it a little bit too long.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. spatulaboy

    spatulaboy I'm not really here Subscribing Member

    Jul 13, 2011
    North Carolina
    Vin
    The Sigma 60mm f2.8 is brilliant. A 60mm f1.2 would be quite insane!

    To be honest I would settle for a 50mm f1.4, that would be a great portrait lens on m4/3.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. BobbyTan

    BobbyTan Mu-43 Top Veteran

    579
    Dec 26, 2013
    Long Beach, CA
    Agree, but quite honestly, I don't think an Olympus version could be any better than the Nocticron which IMO is almost perfect. And it doesn't make a lot of sense to compete head-on with a lens that is perfect or near-perfect. The Nocticron is currently the highest-rated m43 lens on DXO. I think there's a high probability that it will be somewhere between 12 and 17.5mm.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  18. EarthQuake

    EarthQuake Mu-43 Top Veteran

    916
    Sep 30, 2013
    Yeah, unless they want to compete on price, which admittedly there probably is some room, I would hope they don't come out with a 45/1.2. A 25/1.2, 17/1.2, or even a 14/1.2 or 12/2, even though I would have little interest in the 14/12, would be better than yet another ~45mm lens.
     
  19. spatulaboy

    spatulaboy I'm not really here Subscribing Member

    Jul 13, 2011
    North Carolina
    Vin
    A 35mm f1.2 would be cool.

    This was taken with my Minolta 50mm f1.4 with Metabones Speed Booster making it a 35.5mm f1.0 Now imagine a sharper, AF lens with this rendering. I'd buy it.
    26043026454_2b6b4debda_b.
    Ruffled
    by Vincent Tsai, on Flickr
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Like Like x 3
  20. tkbslc

    tkbslc Mu-43 Legend

    I honestly would like a 45mm f1.2, because I think Olympus would price it responsibly. The Panasonic 42.5mm f1.2 is at least 60% overpriced. Of course, we have good options at that focal length, but there's a pretty big gap between $350 42.5mm f1.7 and $1500 42.5mm f1.2.

    We NEED a high speed 35mm equiv. It's the obvious hole in the system that's glaringly obvious.

    TBH, a 17mm f1.2 and 45mm f1.2 would cover about 95% of the scenarios that I would want a fast prime for. That would make the most sense to me.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.