1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

A better IQ tele lens than the 14-150

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by Kiwi Paul, Jul 4, 2012.

  1. Kiwi Paul

    Kiwi Paul Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Aug 15, 2011
    Aberdeen Scotland
    I have the Oly 14-150 and for what it is its a great lens, it actually performs very well from 14 to about 70mm and after that the softness and lack of resolution compromises it, especially if you try to take crops.

    I was wondering if the the Oly m40-150 or the Lumix 45-175 are much better IQ wise? I imagine they will be an improvement but if it's only marginal then it doesn't seem worth it. Has anyone been able to compare them?
    I know the 35-100 is forecast and that focal length and speed would be ideal, but since it's likely to be expensive I'm finding hard to justify spending that kind of money on a lens.

    I'm keeping the 14-150 as it's a truly excellent walkabout lens but just want a better lens when I want to take more discerning pics.

  2. tomas

    tomas Mu-43 Regular

    Pany 45-175

    I sold my 14-150 and my 40-150 for the same reasons that you cited. In May I bought the Pany 45-175. I use it on my em5 with very satisfactory results. It's not the 4/3 50-200, mind you, but overall it's quite good and IMHO much better than the lenses I sold with respect to IQ. I've not had any problems with the lens IS fighting the body IS.
  3. strang

    strang Mu-43 Veteran

    May 7, 2012
    Judging from what I've seen the 75-300 is the sharpest telephoto for micro four thirds. But you already have the 100-300, wouldn't that solve your telephoto needs?
  4. tomas

    tomas Mu-43 Regular


    I also had and sold the 75-300. I didn't find it to be particularly sharp. Also I didn't use it very much. It's not fast enough for good early morning and late evening wildlife shots.
  5. Kiwi Paul

    Kiwi Paul Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Aug 15, 2011
    Aberdeen Scotland
    Thanks Strang, I've updated my signature, I sold the 100-300 a while ago as I never used it, I'm looking for a lens to cover 40-150ish.

  6. dhazeghi

    dhazeghi Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 6, 2010
    San Jose, CA
    I'd vote for the 40-150. The 45-175 is smaller, but from what I've seen it's not quite as sharp. Plus if you find one refurbished, the 40-150 is literally half the price of the 45-175. However, both options are a good amount better than the 14-150 at the long end, which is probably the weakest native m4/3 lens at 150mm.

  7. bongestrella

    bongestrella Mu-43 Veteran

    Sep 2, 2011
    Mechanicsburg, PA
    Very timely, this is a copy and paste of my message to a user here about my oly 14-150 vs 40-150..

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.