9 unbelievable camera lenses that actually exist.

soundimageplus

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
782
Location
Worcestershire
My favourite is the Nikon 6mm F/2.8 Fisheye. A snip at $34,000.
Stand behind that and you'll have Torchwood on your case! (For UK readers)
 

iGonzoid

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
247
Location
Tasmania, Australia
Regarding Amin's beautiful examples of his Canon 50mm f0.95 —*are these shot on the Canon RF? I always craved one of these for my M3. I am now considering the Voiglander 25mm f0.95 for use on my EP-2.
 

~tc~

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
2,494
Location
Houston, TX
The 25/0.95 seems like a bargain compared to everything else with that aperture
 

Brian S

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Apr 11, 2009
Messages
714
I have the 50/0.95 for the Canon 7, and it is amazing for a 50 year old lens.

But with the price they go for, and the cost to convert to a Leica M3: Buy the Cosina/Voigtlander 50/1.1 Nokton instead. It is sharper wide-open, uses 58mm filters rather than 72mm filters, obstructs much less of the viewfinder. These days, the Canon with the cost of conversion runs $2000 and more. I paid $200 for mine when things were sane a few years ago. The Nokton at ~$1000 is a bargain.

Some test pictures with the Nokton on the M8:
http://www.seriouscompacts.com/gallery/showgallery.php?cat=552

If you've read Ken Rockwell's review of the 50/1.1 Nokton on the M9: Ha. The Nokton comes out of the box optimized for film. Should be fine on an M3. For digital- I built up the cam by 0.05mm for the M8. Focus is spot-on.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom