1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

$800 to purchase m43 system...

Discussion in 'This or That? (MFT only)' started by nrowensby, Jan 26, 2012.

  1. nrowensby

    nrowensby Mu-43 Regular

    89
    Jan 25, 2012
    Columbia, SC
    I'm currently switching to :43: from an EOS system and trying to determine what to buy. I'm switching for a smaller body and I want to start using with some old MF lenses.

    I'm looking to buy used, as I don't like being the one who eats depreciation on a new camera. :D 

    Requirements:
    *Must be compatible with optional VF
    *Must have hotshoe

    Preferred:
    *Image Stabilization
    *Decent ISO1600 IQ

    Suggestions?
     
  2. SRHEdD

    SRHEdD Mu-43 Top Veteran

    979
    Feb 24, 2011
    Viera, Florida USA
    Steve
    E-PL2, VF-2, 14-42 II, 17 2.8, FL36-R.
    Or drop the 17 and grab an OM lens adapter and start hunting...

    My 2¢.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. nrowensby

    nrowensby Mu-43 Regular

    89
    Jan 25, 2012
    Columbia, SC
    On the used market... What is the approx going rate of each item? (Sorry in advance for my ignorance of :43: pricing)

    Also, how does the 17/2.8 compare to the 20/1.7?
     
  4. Aegon

    Aegon Mu-43 Veteran

    342
    Nov 3, 2011
    Portland, OR
    EPL2 is a good deal at $200-ish, commonly $250.
    VF-2 is a good deal at $150, commonly $180
    17 is a good deal at $140, commonly $165
    FL36 is a good deal at $130, commonly $155

    These are just estimates.

    Nobody likes the 17 when compared to the 20. Except for people who use the 17, who tend to like it a bunch. Including myself.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  5. drewbot

    drewbot Mu-43 Top Veteran

    702
    Oct 21, 2011
    Toronto, ON
    Get the 20 mm. Worth the extra $$ over the 17.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. nrowensby

    nrowensby Mu-43 Regular

    89
    Jan 25, 2012
    Columbia, SC
    How do the Olympus and Panasonic kit lenses compare? Are either known to be significantly better (sharpness/contrast/focus speed/etc)


    Also, what is the difference in the EPL1 & EPL2? The specs on all these bodies look so similar... :confused: 
     
  7. SRHEdD

    SRHEdD Mu-43 Top Veteran

    979
    Feb 24, 2011
    Viera, Florida USA
    Steve
    • Like Like x 1
  8. nrowensby

    nrowensby Mu-43 Regular

    89
    Jan 25, 2012
    Columbia, SC
    Thanks... I forgot about Snapsort... Definitely going with the EPL2, I was leaning towards that camera before creating this thread anyway... Thanks for the validation...

    Now... Onto lens decisions... :D 
     
  9. pxpaulx

    pxpaulx Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 19, 2010
    Midwest
    Paul
    Only the original Panasonic 14-45mm kit lens was lauded to be worth an extra expense. Otherwise the newer II and II R kit lenses from Olympus are silent focus for video (the Panasonic 14-42mm may be as well, don't know). 1st Gen Olympus and the panasonic 14-42 should be found easily for under $100 total, while the newer Olympus may fetch another $20 or so than that. The original Panasonic 14-45mm goes a shade above $200 used on ebay.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. nrowensby

    nrowensby Mu-43 Regular

    89
    Jan 25, 2012
    Columbia, SC
    Thanks... Just got a call and set up a meeting to possibly sell my 1DII... Hope to be movign to :43: quite soon! :) 
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Bhupinder2002

    Bhupinder2002 Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    welcome to the club .. Hope ur camera sells quickly
    Cheers
    Bhupinder
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther Mu-43 Legend

    May 4, 2011
    Texas
    • Like Like x 1
  13. zerotiu

    zerotiu Mu-43 Veteran

    222
    Sep 13, 2011
    Indonesia-Singapore
    It's easy when you say IS..Olympus :D 
    Used PEN series + VF2, EP3 for better 1600 ISO performance.

    Even better if you have Nix Dfine :biggrin:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. hkpzee

    hkpzee Mu-43 All-Pro

    Sep 5, 2011
    Hong Kong
    Patrick
    but the E-PL2 autofocus is quicker than the E-P2...

    I would recommend the E-PL2 if price is a concern, as it represents, IMHO, the best value for money. If price is not too much of a concern, I would try to look for a used E-P3...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther Mu-43 Legend

    May 4, 2011
    Texas
    With only an $800 budget, a used E-P3 leaves the poster very little left for lenses....
     
  16. SRHEdD

    SRHEdD Mu-43 Top Veteran

    979
    Feb 24, 2011
    Viera, Florida USA
    Steve
    [shameless plug] It just so happens I just listed one of my PERFECT E-PL2s in the classifieds here! [/shameless plug]
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. ntblowz

    ntblowz Mu-43 Veteran

    337
    Nov 13, 2011
    Auckland, New Zealand
    E-PL2 and E-P2 focus the same on 14mm and 20mm, only the kit lens that makes the difference.
     
  18. nrowensby

    nrowensby Mu-43 Regular

    89
    Jan 25, 2012
    Columbia, SC
    So... are you saying the lens that comes with the E-PL2 focuses faster than the lens that came with the E-P2?

    So... Will the kit lens that came with the E-PL2 focus at the same rate on the E-P2 and E-PL2?
     
  19. John M Flores

    John M Flores Super Moderator

    Jan 7, 2011
    Somerville, NJ
    Last year I got my GF2 + 14/2.5 pancake for $379 or some crazy price like that. I also got my GH1 for $299. Crazy prices. Create a Google Alert and friend Panasonic on Facebook and be patient for a deal young padawan.
     
  20. nrowensby

    nrowensby Mu-43 Regular

    89
    Jan 25, 2012
    Columbia, SC
    Leaning towards Olympus for Image Stabilization...
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.