75mm prime or 100-300mm zoom

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by Triggertrevor, Oct 13, 2013.

  1. Triggertrevor

    Triggertrevor Mu-43 Regular

    62
    Jun 30, 2013
    Morning everybody I'd like people's input into these 2 lenes.

    I recently bought panasonics 35-100 zoom which I like even though it's taking some getting used to, but I sometimes find its not long enough when using the lens at football matches.

    So I was wondering wether the olympus 75mm would be a good lens to give me that extra reach plus I'll have to admit I'm a slight pixel peeper when it comes to images and I'm a little worried that the 100-300 lens might not give me the image quality I want.

    Thanks all

    Kev
     
  2. elavon

    elavon Mu-43 All-Pro

    Sep 1, 2012
    Tel Aviv Israel
    Ehud
    If the 35-100 is not long enough why do you want to consider a shorter lens.
    The 100-300 is sharp and has a very long reach plus go IS.
    In the picture below I have shot from a tripod and turned off the OIS you can examine the full frame sharpness in flicker.

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ehudlavon/8637286883/" title="From my house by Ehud Lavon, on Flickr"> 8637286883_b5aaacb3c1_b. "1024" height="768" alt="From my house"></a>
     
  3. pdk42

    pdk42 One of the "Eh?" team

    Jan 11, 2013
    Leamington Spa, UK
    The 100-300 is not in the same league as the 75/1.8 for sharpness. That's not surprising through - the 100-300 is a slow consumer zoom; the 75 is a pro quality fast prime and aimed at a largely different set of uses. The 75's a medium telephoto; great for portraits, indoor sports and such like, but it ain't got 'reach'. I've read that the 35-100 is not far behind it in sharpness though, so in your situation, unless the extra stop and a half matters, then it makes no sense to buy the 75.

    If you want reach for outdoor sports, then the 100-300 is probably fine, but TBH, non of the u43 long telephotos are particularly special. If you're a pixel peeper doing sports, then you'll need a high-end Canon FF body with a big L lens. Good luck with the impact on the bank account and your aching limbs though! Maybe the new E-M1 with the Oly 300/2.8 or 90-250/2.8 would fit the bill too :wink:
     
  4. Triggertrevor

    Triggertrevor Mu-43 Regular

    62
    Jun 30, 2013
    Sorry got mixed up with crop factors regarding the olympus 75.

    That picture look loverly and sharp.

    cheers for the info.

    Kev
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Triggertrevor

    Triggertrevor Mu-43 Regular

    62
    Jun 30, 2013
    I didn't know olympus did a 300 2.8 or a 90-250 2.8 in m43 or do you me the 4/3 lenses seen as the m1 can take those lenses too.

    cheers
     
  6. pdk42

    pdk42 One of the "Eh?" team

    Jan 11, 2013
    Leamington Spa, UK
    Yes, I mean the 4/3 lenses. With the adapter, the E-M1 apparently works very well with them. Those two lenses I mentioned though are $$$$.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.