VooDoo64
Mu-43 Veteran
So latly i've been reeding more and more about this on 40-150 Pro lens, today even Photozone give a review abou lens and said:
"The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO is, mostly, a highly desirable lens – except for one bug. On the positive side, it is very good if not excellent in the primary image quality metrics. It is very sharp across the focal length range including some greatness in the middle portion. Vignetting and distortions are very low. One the downside, the quality of the bokeh (out-of-focus blur) can be disappointing – not in all scenes but busy backgrounds are clearly not the lens’ best friends."
I bouht lens few days ago and i didnt shoot in many light situation but even few of todays from zoo - Unfortunately, I can say that they are right and it is a shame that the olens of this class have such problems
Lens is near perfect in 5m redius but after that all light ( backlight, contra-light ) makes problem - even worse is that I have 50-200 and on 50-200 I didnt have that much or maybe not at all problem like this and i did about 15-20.000 shots with 50-200
also - lens is super sharp on close object let say up to 10m, but on the far 15-30 and further ehre is no more sharpnes while on 50-200 you can zoom on 100% on 10km away and stil have very shrap picture...
so i know there is many owner here on forum and I would like to know your experiences with 40-150 PRO
"The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO is, mostly, a highly desirable lens – except for one bug. On the positive side, it is very good if not excellent in the primary image quality metrics. It is very sharp across the focal length range including some greatness in the middle portion. Vignetting and distortions are very low. One the downside, the quality of the bokeh (out-of-focus blur) can be disappointing – not in all scenes but busy backgrounds are clearly not the lens’ best friends."
I bouht lens few days ago and i didnt shoot in many light situation but even few of todays from zoo - Unfortunately, I can say that they are right and it is a shame that the olens of this class have such problems
Lens is near perfect in 5m redius but after that all light ( backlight, contra-light ) makes problem - even worse is that I have 50-200 and on 50-200 I didnt have that much or maybe not at all problem like this and i did about 15-20.000 shots with 50-200
also - lens is super sharp on close object let say up to 10m, but on the far 15-30 and further ehre is no more sharpnes while on 50-200 you can zoom on 100% on 10km away and stil have very shrap picture...
so i know there is many owner here on forum and I would like to know your experiences with 40-150 PRO
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)