3 "Perfect" Things About Micro Four Thirds

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by RT_Panther, Aug 5, 2013.

  1. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther Mu-43 Legend

    May 4, 2011
    Texas
    - M. Zuiko 75-300
    - Lumix 100-300
    - 2.0 Crop Factor

    I don't think there's any system out now that has native glass with a 600mm FL (35mm Equivalent). Couple this with the size of the 2 lenses coupled with body and again, no other system provides this.
     
  2. slothead

    slothead Mu-43 All-Pro

    Aug 14, 2012
    Frederick, MD
    Sure there are. How about the Nikon 80-400 on DX sensor-equipped cameras for one. Maybe I missed your point.
     
  3. stratokaster

    stratokaster Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 4, 2011
    Kyiv, Ukraine
    Pavel
    Or Sony 500mm f/4. But you'd better not even think about its price :eek:
     
  4. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther Mu-43 Legend

    May 4, 2011
    Texas
    LoL yup!
    I should include a 4th which is price....:biggrin:
     
  5. xdayv

    xdayv Color Blind

    Aug 26, 2011
    Tacloban City, Philippines
    Dave
    I think the 7-14 is also a very powerful proposition for the Micro 4/3s, offering a 14mm equivalent at the widest end -- with the size, weight and portability considered.
     
  6. Vivalo

    Vivalo Olympus Loser

    941
    Nov 16, 2010
    Finland
    Don't know much about telezooms but my three perfect things about this system are:

    1. This forum
    2. Equipment is small so it doesn't look expensive (yes, I'm married!)
    3. Equipment is small so people are not too aware of being photographed

    Ok, number 2 and 3 are true with any other mirrorless system.
     
  7. usayit

    usayit Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Size
    Weight
    Selection
     
  8. metalmania

    metalmania Mu-43 Veteran

    244
    Jul 19, 2012
    NYC
    cannot agree more
     
  9. zap

    zap Mu-43 Veteran

    215
    Jul 23, 2012
    uk

    + 1. :biggrin:
     
  10. Uncle Frank

    Uncle Frank Photo Enthusiast

    772
    Jul 26, 2012
    San Jose, CA
    Frank
    • Lenses (size, selection, price)
    • Oly jpgs
    • IBIS
     
  11. rhoydotp

    rhoydotp Mu-43 Top Veteran

    609
    Aug 5, 2012
    Toronto, Ont
    rpamparo
    don't know about being "perfect", if I had to say what might be the best things about m43

    it may have the highest quality per sensor square inch right now :)
     
  12. DynaSport

    DynaSport Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 5, 2013
    Dan
    Well, for the price you certainly can't beat the M43 zooms, but for quality I'll take a 7D with the Canon 400. To save money you can go the Canon 100-400. Still quite a bit more money than the M43 zooms though, but the quality (and AF) is excellent.
     
  13. htc

    htc Mu-43 Top Veteran

    579
    Jan 11, 2011
    Finland
    Harry
    It would be close call that it's other way round :smile:
     
  14. DynaSport

    DynaSport Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 5, 2013
    Dan
    Maybe just from the camara standpoint, I don't think so with the lenses thrown in.
     
  15. NiteWing

    NiteWing Mu-43 Rookie

    24
    Aug 4, 2013
    Virginia
    1. Size (why most people switch in the first place)
    2. Price (justification for switching)
    3. Selection (Comfort in switching)
     
  16. Bhupinder2002

    Bhupinder2002 Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    1)this forum
    2) R T panther
    3)Bhupinder2002
    :biggrin:
     
  17. pdk42

    pdk42 One of the "Eh?" team

    Jan 11, 2013
    Leamington Spa, UK
    Very perceptive!
     
  18. jeffryscott

    jeffryscott Mu-43 Top Veteran

    505
    Jul 2, 2010
    Arizona
    image quality
    size
    weight
    lens selection

    I added a fourth but rank them in whatever order is most important. No other system can match the versatility of m43.

    Other's may be better at some things, but at what price (cost, weight, size?)
     
  19. mannukiddo

    mannukiddo Mu-43 Veteran

    217
    Jul 28, 2013
    India
    Size size and size. I am now carrying a camera with me a lot more than it was ever possible when I only had a dslr.
    I no longer crib about the size and bulk of my cameras anymore especially when travelling . Image quality is excellent at low ISOs but I think the lenses should be a lot cheaper.

    I mean why is a 45 1.8 so expensive when a 50 1.8 is so cheap for a Canon covering a bigger image circle.

    Sent from my Nexus 4
     
  20. DynaSport

    DynaSport Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 5, 2013
    Dan
    The 45 1.8 is a much better lens than the Canon 50 1.8. And Canon sells a with a more similar price to the 45 and one with a much more expensive price as well. The 1.8 version is very cheaply made and has benefits from a larger production lifespan and being an old design.