28/2?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by x2h, Sep 7, 2010.

  1. x2h

    x2h New to Mu-43

    5
    Sep 5, 2010
    Hi everyone, my working view is equivalent to 28 mm. Looks like there's no native MFT 28 mm yet. What would be my choice if I want a 28/2 or even 28/1.4? Thanks!
     
  2. Brian S

    Brian S Mu-43 Top Veteran

    714
    Apr 11, 2009
    Nikon has made a 28/2, available since ~1970. A lot are around. It is not a small lens, about the same size as an 85mm telephoto. Mine was $100, "good user" meaning cosmetically ugly. Konica made a 28/1.8 that is terrific, but uncommon and more expensive. 28/1.4's are around, and run a good bit, ~$500 or up.
     
  3. shawngibson

    shawngibson Mu-43 Regular

    119
    Aug 9, 2010
    Only lens I can think of is Oly 14-35/2.0. Nothing else will give you close to those specs, and certainly not a prime. Unfortunately, it's very expensive, but has a lot of positive reviews...though it is far from small.

    How narrow are you willing to go? And how much willing to lose in aperture?

    edit: sorry are you saying you want the equivalent to 28mm in a 35mm system, or 28 uFT?

    Shawn
     
  4. pdh

    pdh Mu-43 Top Veteran

    598
    May 6, 2010
    but does the OP mean 28mm on m4/3 or 35mm ? if the latter then he's looking for a 14mm f/1.4 which might be expensive ...

    EDIT: oops too late ...
     
  5. Spanjaart

    Spanjaart Mu-43 Regular

    35
    Sep 6, 2010
    Either way a good 1.4 28mm would set you back a good part of your life's savings or even all of it in the worst case even if you owned a well kept mansion.
     
  6. Brian S

    Brian S Mu-43 Top Veteran

    714
    Apr 11, 2009
    For a fast, wide-angle, cheap price- I'm using a C-Mount lens. It vignettes at the corners. I've read threads on GETDPI.COM where two members disassembled the C-Mount lens and moved the front section in closer to the rear module to reduce vignetting. I have not done that, might take a look at the Kowa 12.5mm F1.4 lens that I have.
     
  7. e.besana

    e.besana Mu-43 Regular

    59
    Apr 16, 2010
    Tarrytown, NY
    @ x2h: I have a vivitar 28mm f2. I picked it up on ebay for $25. It is prone to flare so for outdoors a hood is a must. It is also not very sharp at f2 but definitely usable. f4 and up yield some very nice images. IMO nice bokeh. good for the price. -eb
    P1030262.JPG
    there's a front view image of it in my gallery
     
  8. OzRay

    OzRay Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 29, 2010
    South Gippsland, Australia
    Ray, not Oz
    Voigtlander make a very good and small 28mm f2 in M mount.

    [​IMG]

    Cheers

    Ray
     
  9. x2h

    x2h New to Mu-43

    5
    Sep 5, 2010
    thanks for all the enthusiastic replies in such a short period of time! makes me feel like home right away. sorry i was a little vague, but i meant 28 mm equivalent to 135, which means 14 mm on MFT. I know there are 28 mm lens under 135 but they are too big for the purpose of using my GF1. i am wondering if there's a 14mm/2 lens for MFT. thanks for any input!
     
  10. neilvan

    neilvan Mu-43 Regular

    25
    Aug 31, 2010
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada
    Neil
    There is always the OM 28mm f2, it ain't cheap, but it's pretty!
     
  11. x2h

    x2h New to Mu-43

    5
    Sep 5, 2010
    i got it!

    looks like Panny just listened to me and came out with the 14/2.5 pancake. it's not exactly 14/2 but still a nice job Panny!
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.