Hi. First a little history. I previously owned a G5 which I liked but had to sell due to some health/financial concerns that came up. I had to sell it before I was able to use it a lot. Since then I have recently purchased an EPM2 and love the jpeg output of the camera. My main interests as far as photography are macro and birding/wildlife photography. Right now I have the EPM2 with kit lens and Oly 45 1.8 for pictures of pets, etc. I liked a lot of the G5 features for the wildlife photography especially the ergonomics with larger lenses so a few questions. Which of the following would you do? 1) Keep the EPM2 to use with an Oly 60 2.8 for macro and also get a G5 to use with telephoto lens. 2) Sell the EPM2 and use a G5 for both applications. 3) Keep the EPM2, get a VF and use for both applications (with either Panny 100-300 or Oly 75-300). 4) Wait (for possibly a long while for me financially) and get the OMD and sell the EPM2. I currently use a Canon SX50HS for birding. Are there any features of the EPM2 or G5 that are better one over the other for the type of photography I am doing? Am I overlooking something? I am so conflicted because I love the output of the EPM2 but feel like it may be difficult with the telephoto lenses. Whatever I do I would like to be able to keep for a couple of years before upgrading. Thanks.