150-400mm f4 Pro will have built-in 1.25x TC?!?!?

mcasan

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
1,670
Location
Atlanta

hoodlum

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Messages
368
Location
Toronto Canada
The Canon and Nikon equivalent lenses with built-in TC cost $11-$12k US. I would expect this Olympus lens to cost more than $10k and weigh a similar 3.5kg.
 

dornblaser

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Messages
3,387
Location
Chicago-area
Real Name
David Dornblaser
The Canon and Nikon equivalent lenses with built-in TC cost $11-$12k US. I would expect this Olympus lens to cost more than $10k and weigh a similar 3.5kg.
I would be surprised if it does as that would not in keeping with other m4/3 lenses. The Panasonic 100-400 costs ~ $1,800.00, I would expect the new Olympus to cost over $2,000.00 but less than $3,500.00. IMHO.
 

Reflector

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 31, 2013
Messages
2,139
Explains the 150mm minimum focal length rather than a more typical 100mm as well as it. It sounds a lot more exotic than a 150-400mm f/4.5 for sure. Suddenly this is a lot more exotic sounding than a "mundane" 150-400mm f/4.x lens.

Edit: Maybe not. 1.25x and f/4.5 means a 500mm f/5.6 but that'd throw out a 2x TC since it'd have to be focused at f/9 unless somehow the E-M1X has some insanely sensitive OSPDAF on it. A f/4.5 on the long end would knock down the front element requirement from ~100mm to below 90mm. Then again, FT5 means the noises of it being a f/4.5 might not be true then.
 
Last edited:

Turbofrog

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2014
Messages
5,362
I would be surprised if it does as that would not in keeping with other m4/3 lenses. The Panasonic 100-400 costs ~ $1,800.00, I would expect the new Olympus to cost over $2,000.00 but less than $3,500.00. IMHO.
Unfortunately, the Panasonic example confirms hoodlum's thesis, rather than contradicts it.

The Panasonic-Leica 100-400mm costs $1800. Canon's 100-400mm costs between $1800-2200, depending on promotions.

If Olympus sells this for a penny under $10,000 all it suggests is that they are willing to accept a much smaller margin than Canon and Nikon.
 

Phocal

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
5,189
Location
Houston
I would be surprised if it does as that would not in keeping with other m4/3 lenses. The Panasonic 100-400 costs ~ $1,800.00, I would expect the new Olympus to cost over $2,000.00 but less than $3,500.00. IMHO.
What does the price of a Panasonic consumer grade lens have to do with the price of an Olympus Pro lens? It’s a constant f/4.0, just look at how much the 300/4 is and then factor in all the extra glass to keep the IQ to Olympus standards at a constant f/4.0 in a zoom. Not to mention the trickery needed to have a built in TC that you can easily switch on/off.

This lens will be at least 10k.......

I personally would love this lens and may actually get it before getting the EM1X.
 

jacobm

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Jan 28, 2018
Messages
15
I feel like one of the few people really excited about this lens and the EM-1X. I'm really hoping for a price nearer to 5k than 10k, but who knows.
 

rogazilla

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Apr 17, 2018
Messages
39
Location
NC, USA
If the spec is true then this is probably as many have mentioned 5k to 10k lens.
Clearly Olympus wants to have something in the Pro sports category. This may be a great alternative for people who loves to do air shows, birding and such and save some weight on the D5s or 1dX and their humongous lenses.

I am more interested in the interim if the 2x converter works with the 40-150 pro? That'd be pretty useful on top of the 1.4x.
 

x_holger

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
96
Location
Berlin, Germany
As rarely as I agree to the conclusions of 43rumors.com
in this case I think the 4.0/150-400 plus 1.25x integrated converter, 5-axis OIS plus dual IS, plus 2x converter
will indeed be a great lens for wildlife shooters that is hard to resist.
But not only for wildlife shooters but also for sports photographers ...
Combine it with the upcoming E-M1X with AI improved AF and it's impressive processing speed and this will be a great offer for the Olympics in Tokyo.
I think the strategy of Olympus is getting clearer, even if it's not for me ... it's still impressive.
It does indeed max out what mFT is capable of.
 

dornblaser

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Messages
3,387
Location
Chicago-area
Real Name
David Dornblaser
Unfortunately, the Panasonic example confirms hoodlum's thesis, rather than contradicts it.

The Panasonic-Leica 100-400mm costs $1800. Canon's 100-400mm costs between $1800-2200, depending on promotions.

If Olympus sells this for a penny under $10,000 all it suggests is that they are willing to accept a much smaller margin than Canon and Nikon.
I would think that the proper comparisons for the Canon and Nikon's 100-400 mm lenses would be the 40-150 PRO and PL50-200. I am likely to be wrong, or maybe it is just wishful thinking, but I am thinking that it will come in $1,000.00 more than the 300mm PRO. I am also hoping that the new EM-1X is the new video standard. :flypig:
 

Mike Wingate

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
2,334
Location
Altrincham
Real Name
Mike Wingate
A great match for the new camera body. Appeals to everyone, affordable to the few. No red dots. An extra converter will be available. This will reduce the speed unless it is very bright.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2014
Messages
1,958
Location
Maryland
Real Name
Loren
Given the integrated x1.25 tc and the fact that the x1.4 tc already exists, I don’t really have much interest in the x2 tc as it pertains to this lens, and suspect it has more to do with the other Pro super-telephoto lenses in the lineup: the 40-150mm, 300mm, and perhaps whatever other telephoto zoom they are rumored to be announcing. Since the 150-400mm is looking to be so expensive and both a niche product and a statement piece, I’d imagine this other lens will be something a bit more affordable. Curious that we’re only hearing about this one thus far...

Regardless, I’ll be very tempted by this lens...
 

Turbofrog

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2014
Messages
5,362
A great match for the new camera body. Appeals to everyone, affordable to the few. No red dots. An extra converter will be available. This will reduce the speed unless it is very bright.
On the contrary, it looks like this body and lens is practically crying out to be used with a red dot... ;)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

whumber

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jun 13, 2017
Messages
537
I am more interested in the interim if the 2x converter works with the 40-150 pro? That'd be pretty useful on top of the 1.4x.
I'm very doubtful that the 40-150 PRO would hold up under a 2X TC. I was never particularly impressed with the MC-14 + 40-150 PRO, unlike the MC-14 + 300 PRO combo which is excellent, and a 2X TC is going to be significantly worse.
 

ralf-11

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
1,290
should I add it to my wish list (which contains the PL teles right now)?
 

ac12

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Apr 24, 2018
Messages
1,817
Location
SF Bay Area, California, USA
I must be missing something.
I can see 1.4x, but 1.25x tele-converter? :confused:
25% more magnification is not a whole heck of a lot. A 1.4x seems to make more sense (which is what the Nikon 180-400 has), at 1 stop light loss. Even better for magnification, would be a 2x TC, but at 2 stops of light loss.
For only 25% more magnification, I would leave the TC off and lower the price.

Then again the 1.25x TC could be a cheaper alternative to a straight 150-500 zoom.

Unless maybe 1.25x was chosen to minimize light loss to be effectively less than going from f/4 to 5.6, so the AF is not significantly affected. This is just a guess on my part.
 

T N Args

Agent Photocateur
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
3,475
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Real Name
call me Arg
It could be "olympus talk" for a 120-320/4 lens that becomes 150-400/5 with the iTCV engaged.

That way, "it's an f/4 lens" and "it does 150-400" are both true.

At least that might bring the price down from total insanity.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom