1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

14-42 II r vs. 12-50 OMD kit lens

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by WT21, Jul 31, 2012.

  1. WT21

    WT21 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Feb 19, 2010
    Boston
    Ignoring size/weight issues, would I gain anything on my EPM1 (so, no weather sealing really) by moving from the 14-42 to the 12-50.

    I would love my kit lens to be a little wider (+1 for the 12-50), but the f/stop at max FL is smaller (6.3 is it???). The macro capability is nice.

    How about sharpness, contrast, distortion etc. etc. Any benefit from the 12-50 over the 14-42?
     
  2. M4/3

    M4/3 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    712
    Sep 24, 2011
    No benefit in sharpness, contrast, distortion etc. etc
     
  3. Promit

    Promit Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 6, 2011
    Baltimore, MD
    Promit Roy
    I am hearing mixed results on sharpness; most likely the answer is it is better, but not by a lot. I have the 12-50 for exactly one reason: I needed a native weather sealed standard zoom. It is getting sold the minute something better (12-60 2.8-4 please) arrives.

    It is not a bad lens, but even at $250 there are so many other things to be had...
     
  4. Pennington

    Pennington Mu-43 Regular

    Keep in mind that the "macro" capability isn't true macro - it's just the ability to get closer than usual focus, and only at a fixed focal length (43mm, IIRC).

    Having briefly played with a friends 12-60, I was happy I had chosen the 14-42 instead. The smaller size/weight alone made me happy.
     
  5. rwisem

    rwisem Mu-43 Regular

    27
    Jun 20, 2012
    Sequim, Washington, USA
    Roger Wiseman
    Basically, M4/3 is correct, although the 12-50 may be a little better at the long end, but contrast is supposedly a small issue.

    Many new OMD owners are selling off new 12-50's that came with the kit. I got one for $270 on the auction site.

    It is very well built and the manual/power zoom is trick. There are 4 reasons you might want it.
    1. slightly wider and longer (obviously)
    2. An very usable macro function in my experience
    3. Power zoom is a boon if you shoot video.
    4. Weatherproofing.

    I bought for the first 2 reasons and am happy with it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. WT21

    WT21 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Feb 19, 2010
    Boston
    Thanks everyone.

    At what FL does it go past f/5.6?
     
  7. strang

    strang Mu-43 Veteran

    287
    May 7, 2012
    +1 for 12-50.

    But for OP the only benefits are macro and power zoom.

    I would rather keep 14-42 II R if I was in your shoes. You already have the 9-18 for wide situations.
     
  8. marygoround

    marygoround Mu-43 Regular

    85
    Jul 19, 2012
    Philippines
    Mary
    Having same thoughts with WT21. Wondering if it may be worth it or just invest the money with a good prime.
     
  9. zapatista

    zapatista Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    671
    Mar 19, 2012
    Albuquerque, NM
    Mike Barber
    The 12-50mm in my experience is much sharper than the 14-42 IIR and the macro is surprisingly good.
     
  10. jeffryscott

    jeffryscott Mu-43 Top Veteran

    505
    Jul 2, 2010
    Arizona
    I love the 12-50, but wouldn't invest in it unless I had a weather sealed body (which I do). The 14-42 is a good, inexpensive lens.
     
  11. strang

    strang Mu-43 Veteran

    287
    May 7, 2012
    Just double checked. At 35mm it reaches f/5.6. At 40mm it reaches f/5.8.
     
  12. kevwilfoto

    kevwilfoto Mu-43 Veteran

    294
    Sep 23, 2011
    Colorado
    Ditto. If that rumored 12-60 doesn't happen, I'm gonna cry.
     
  13. bongestrella

    bongestrella Mu-43 Veteran

    404
    Sep 2, 2011
    Mechanicsburg, PA
    Based on my 2 copies of 14-42 R and 1 copy 12-50, the 14-42's are actually a little sharper below 35mm. Beyond 35mm, 12-50 is only very slightly sharper. Pretty disappointing regardless of my low expectations. The 12mm is quite nice though, and the semi-macro is a bonus.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.