1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

14-140/150 or 12-50 + 45-200

Discussion in 'This or That? (MFT only)' started by davidzvi, Jun 27, 2014.

  1. davidzvi

    davidzvi Super Moderator Subscribing Member

    Aug 12, 2012
    Outside Boston MA
    What I have: E-P5 with Oly 14-42 and Pan 14-140 + some primes

    A family member is looking for a 14-140 all in one for an E-M10. I could either find another one for them or sell them mine and of course GAS kicks in.

    24-120 and 28-105 have been my favorite ranges on FX bodies for a walking around. My 28-105 has a 1:2 macro that is very handy, it's enough macro for my needs. The 12-50 would also probably be enough.

    I've heard the Pan 45-175 is better than the 45-200 but it's out of the price range and while a 40/45-150 might be cheaper I figure if I'm going to go with separates it should be longer. The only reason I'm really considering it is I could get both the 12-50 and 45-200 for about the same price as a 14-140. I could even end up ahead if I sell my 14-42, though keeping it for it's kit value with the E-P5 might be a better option.

    So, would I be giving up image quality going from the 14-140 to the 12-50? Or would I actually have better image quality?
    The Pan 45-200 would also give me extra reach that would be nice. Anyone know how the two compare int the 100-140 range?
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.