[FS/FT] 135mm Minolta Rokkor, Tamron SR/MD mount lenses $10+ |Location: USA| Ships: WORLD

[barry13]

What type of listing is this?
For Sale or Trade

What are you trying to sell/buy/trade?
135mm MD / SR mount lenses:
Minolta, Tamron 135mm-MD, Soligor

What are your prices?
$10-99 OBO

Where are you located?
USA - so Cal

Where are you willing to to ship?
Anywhere covered by PayPal

Description:

Unless otherwise stated, all are very good working condition, clean glass, no haze or mold, no oil on aperture blades, smooth focus.
(SCROLL DOWN FOR PICTURES)

All prices are OBO.

Minolta SR/MD mount:
Minolta MC Rokkor-PF 135/2.8 VG-, integrated hood, generic caps, 2 available, $39 Image Samples

Minolta MD Tele-Rokkor-X 135/2.8, VG+/EX- (single faint scratch on hood). Minolta caps and Minolta hard case $95 Image Samples

Minolta MC Tele Rokkor QD 135/3.5 + original reversible hood. Minolta caps. EX $25

Tamron Converto 135/2.8, T2 mount + SR/MD adapter; Pre-set aperture. ~12 aperture blades.
Filter thread area is badly damaged but probably still can accept a filter (see pics).
No hood or caps. $25, or $15 w/o adapter.
Showcase - Tamron 135mm f/2.8 CONVERTO for some samples and other info.

Soligor 135/2.8, some wear on barrel but otherwise VG, $10


Note there are some links to reviews of Minoltas at
Minolta SR-mount Lens Info (Rokkor, MD, MC, Celtic, ...)

and the forums have sample image showcases for many of these lenses; see
Showcase - Minolta 135mm f/2.8 MC Tele Rokkor-PF
Showcase - Minolta 135mm f3.5 MD

Payment accepted
Regular PayPal (fee included in price)

Shipping method
USPS Priority

Shipping charge
actual cost; typically $8 for one lens within USA.

Handling time
1-3 days

References
eBay id upon request.

Additional comments
Buyer must have a PayPal confirmed address, Will only ship to the address indicated on PayPal payment

Acknowledgement
I have read and agree to the Buy and Sell rules.

Trades considered for other Rokkor lenses (stuck apertures OK):
28/2, 35/1.8, 35/2.8, 50/1.2, 58, 85, 100/2.5 Rokkor MC, 135/2.0, 200/2.8


Sold:
Minolta MD Tele Rokkor-X 135/3.5, integrated hood, generic caps. $39
Minolta MD Celtic 135/3.5, integrated hood, Minolta Celtic caps, $19
MD Celtic 135/2.8 excellent, original caps, integrated hood $25 Image Samples
Minolta MD 135/3.5, integrated hood, generic caps. $25
Titar 135 (bad aperture) is FREE; see For Sale or Trade: FREE TO GOOD HOME: SR/MD & T-Mount lenses | Location: USA | Ships: anywhere
Vivitar m42 (Pentax) mount:
Vivitar (KOMINE) 135/2.8 Auto Telephoto, m42

 

[barry13]

Scroll down to later post for the Minolta f/2.8's. Here's the f/3.5's:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

And the non-Minolta f/2.8's (the Vivitar is no longer available):

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

More pics may be taken upon request.

 

[Sodabiscuit12345]

Rokkor 100mm f/2 still available?

 

[barry13]

Rokkor 100mm f/2 still available?

Hi, that is one I'm looking for in trade, not selling.
However, I do have a 100/3.5 Rokkor QE for sale:
For Sale or Trade: Minolta Rokkor MD/SR mount lenses, etc. | Location: USA | Ships:

 

[JLGF1]

Are the two 2.8/135mm pictured? I only see the 3.5 and there are more descriptions versus lenses?

I found some of your pics in the other thread that showed the Rokkor, but not the Celtic?

If so, a pic of both together would be nice...side/front.

Unfortunately, the Celtic Showcase no longer has any samples images.

 

[barry13]

Are the two 2.8/135mm pictured? I only see the 3.5 and there are more descriptions versus lenses?

I found some of your pics in the other thread that showed the Rokkor, but not the Celtic?

If so, a pic of both together would be nice...side/front.

Unfortunately, the Celtic Showcase no longer has any samples images.

Hi, the f/2.8's aren't in the pictures above...
The MD Tele Rokkor-X is here at left:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

I'll take some more pics with the other 2.8's.
Thanks

 

[barry13]

Are the two 2.8/135mm pictured? I only see the 3.5 and there are more descriptions versus lenses?
I found some of your pics in the other thread that showed the Rokkor, but not the Celtic?
If so, a pic of both together would be nice...side/front.
Unfortunately, the Celtic Showcase no longer has any samples images.

Hi, here's the remaining Minolta f/2.8's; all four have integrated hoods. All are mechanically and optically excellent, and have only minor cosmetic issues.

Left to right:
MD Minolta Celtic 135/2.8 #1220748 (sold)
MC Tele Rokkor-PF 135/2.8 #1561682
MC Tele Rokkor-PF 135/2.8 #1568496
MD Tele-Rokkor-X 135/2.8 #1248847 - I will include Minolta hard case and caps (not pictured)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Opposite sides, hoods up:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[JLGF1]

Minolta MD Tele Rokkor-X 135/3.5, integrated hood, generic caps. $39

I am a little confused...Rokkor-X looks like 2.8 in the new pics? (not 3.5) Or am I missing something?

 

[barry13]

I am a little confused...Rokkor-X looks like 2.8 in the new pics? (not 3.5) Or am I missing something?

Yeah, I have both. I was planning on keeping the 2.8 -X, but I decided to add it.
The 3.5's are a bit smaller and noticeably lighter than the 2.8's.

 

[JLGF1]

When you get a chance could you post a standup (profile) pic of the 135mm Celtics? 2.8 vs 3.5 ...to get an idea of the size difference? Thanks.

 

[barry13]

When you get a chance could you post a standup (profile) pic of the 135mm Celtics? 2.8 vs 3.5 ...to get an idea of the size difference? Thanks.

They're almost identical in size externally; same barrel design etc.
The 2.8 is only a few mm longer.

edit: Both Celtics are sold

 

[JLGF1]

Thanks. The 2.8 is considerably heavier? (almost 2X?)

 

[barry13]

Thanks. The 2.8 is considerably heavier? (almost 2X?)

404g vs 507g, without caps.

 

[JLGF1]

Ah, ok, I must have looked at the wrong version of the many.

 

[barry13]

Ah, ok, I must have looked at the wrong version of the many.

Hi, FYI the Minolta MD 135/3.5 is even smaller and lighter than the Celtic.

 

[JLGF1]

Hi, FYI the Minolta MD 135/3.5 is even smaller and lighter than the Celtic.

In your opinion, is the difference in max aperture...ie 2.8 vs 3.5, very significant in a practical sense?

 

[barry13]

In your opinion, is the difference in max aperture...ie 2.8 vs 3.5, very significant in a practical sense?

Mostly at night or indoors.

 

[JLGF1]

MD Celtic 135/2.8... what size filter? Doesn't seem to be marked on the lens AFAIK.

 

[barry13]

MD Celtic 135/2.8... what size filter? Doesn't seem to be marked on the lens AFAIK.

Hi, it's 55mm... most of the Minolta 135's are 55mm, but the MD (non-Rokkor) 135/3.5's are 49mm.

FYI, I sold the Celtic f/3.5 yesterday

 

[barry13]

Bump. Free US shipping on orders over $50
International shipping available!

List updated; 5 great lenses still available!

Note lots of sample images linked.

These are fast, sharp telephotos at a great price!
They're great for concerts, events, outdoor portraits...

Questions & offers are welcome!

(Please see my other Rokkors at https://www.mu-43.com/threads/minol...-lenses-etc-9-location-usa-ships-world.95235/ )