1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

12-60 v 14-140

Discussion in 'This or That? (MFT only)' started by justa1972, Aug 5, 2017.

  1. justa1972

    justa1972 Mu-43 Regular

    82
    Jun 29, 2013
    Hello

    I've decided my next camera will be the G80 - but with which lens ?

    The 12-60 is the kit lens but LCE also do a kit with the 14-140 - which is the better lens ?

    I would miss the 12mm if I went 14-140 but I could always later buy a 12mm prime or even the 12-32...

    If I go for the 12-60 I would then have to buy a 45-150 or similar...

    The price difference is £250 more for the 14-140...

    Thanks again
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2017
  2. Mattyh

    Mattyh Mu-43 Veteran

    413
    Dec 14, 2013
    Stoke on Trent
    I had the same dilemma but having owned the older version of the 14-140mm and never being totally happy with it and owning the 12-32mm and liking the 12mm focal length I went for the 12-60mm and I'm more then happy with this lens, in fact it's a lens I now use 90% of the time.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. AllanG

    AllanG Mu-43 Top Veteran

    729
    Aug 26, 2014
    Brisbane, Australia
    Allan
    I ordered the 14-140mm II and love it. Great colour rendition and really nice IQ. Indeed this lens is the only one I take travelling except for the Oly12mm.
    Would not be without it as its so versatile.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Mike Wingate

    Mike Wingate Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Feb 21, 2017
    Altrincham
    Mike Wingate
    I bought the 14-140mm mk.II. It has replaced my 2 kit lenses, the 12-32 and 35-100, both nice lenses, but I was forever changing them over. Missing 12mm? Do a Panoramic shot, or buy the 7-14mm like I did. You will never stop buying lenses, so dont worry. I have the 100-300, not long enough. The Olympus 60mm, great Macro, can be used as a 60mm, bit tight but not a long lens. Tried a PL15, fast, crisp, had to have one, now thinking of a 42.5mm for theatres, shows and concerts in low light.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. AllanG

    AllanG Mu-43 Top Veteran

    729
    Aug 26, 2014
    Brisbane, Australia
    Allan
    An example of the IQ and colour that the 14-140mm vII renders with an EP5

    P8060019.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
     
    • Like Like x 6
  6. scotttnz

    scotttnz Mu-43 Veteran

    485
    Jan 16, 2012
    Auckland, New Zealand
    I picked up a 14-140 this week as a travel lens for a couple of trips I have coming up. I'll take the G85, 7-14, 14-140, and 20mm. Should cover 95% of situations while minimising lens changes, size, and weight. Initial impressions are positive, but if I didn't have the 7-14 I would probably favour something that went to 12mm.

    So my advice is to have a think about what other plans you have for the camera and system. If you like wider angles, do you plan to get an ultra wide in the future?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. If you don't really plan on other specialised lenses other than a telephoto, I'd just go for the 14-140 Mk2 - the 12-60 f/3.5-5.6 doesn't have much going for it other than weather resistance and 12mm.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Mike Wingate

    Mike Wingate Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Feb 21, 2017
    Altrincham
    Mike Wingate
    You have covered yourself with the 7-14mm. You can still take panoramic shots.
     
  9. Egregius V

    Egregius V Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    511
    Jun 14, 2015
    Massachusetts, USA
    Rev. Gregory Vozzo
    I just bought an unused 12-60 f/3.5-5.6 taken from a kit. I think it has a lot going for it, if you can find a good copy at a good price. Yes, the new 14-140 mark II is only slightly bigger and is also splash/dust-resistant. At full retail price, it's the better buy. However, my 12-60 cost about a third as much, handles great, and is sharp in its entire range (sharpest at 12mm) with noticeably better corner-to-corner resolution than the 14-140 or 14-150 lenses. Zoomed in past 40mm, my copy exhibits some mild left-side decentering, which was noticed in some reviews and isn't as bad as my 14-150 II. Unfortunately, it also front-focuses quite severely in that 40-60mm range. :eek-31: Manually-focused, it's awesome. I'll be returning it and trying again.

    EDIT: second copy is fine. Lens OIS by itself is wonky, but Dual IS works great.
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2019 at 10:03 PM
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.