12-35mm vs 12-40mm size and photo compare

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by ntblowz, Sep 13, 2013.

  1. ntblowz

    ntblowz Mu-43 Veteran

    336
    Nov 13, 2011
    Auckland, New Zealand
    From Here

    1240vs12351_zpsd3358f2b.jpg

    1240vs12352_zps5b7aa3a2.jpg

    Macro test:
    12-35mm
    1235Marco_zpscadcaea2.jpg

    12-40mm
    1240Marco_zpse88cbcd7.jpg

    @ 12mm

    12-35mm
    12-35mmF2812mm_zps8c4a0942.jpg

    12-40mm
    12-40mmF2812mm_zps17052956.jpg

    @ telephoto
    12-35mm @ 35mm
    12-35mmF2835mm_zps764fae39.jpg

    12-40mm @ 40mm
    12-40mmF2840mm_zps42eef29b.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 8
  2. BLT

    BLT Mu-43 Regular

    188
    Jan 13, 2013
    London
    James
    Nice comparison. I am very interested in this lens. I kind of want to sell my 14mm & 45mm to fund it. Leaving me with this and the 20mm.

    Just not sure I can bring myself to spend the £. We shall see. . . .
     
  3. CiaranCReilly

    CiaranCReilly Mu-43 Veteran

    487
    Oct 18, 2012
    Dublin
    Ciaran Reilly
  4. speedandstyle

    speedandstyle Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    It is smaller than most kit lenses for APS systems! And remember this is an f2.8 lens and not the crappy f3.5- whatever kit zooms. I am very happy to trade off some size for speed and IQ!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. ntblowz

    ntblowz Mu-43 Veteran

    336
    Nov 13, 2011
    Auckland, New Zealand
    If you click the link there is a lot more photos there
    1240vs12353_zps8c170b2d.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. dhazeghi

    dhazeghi Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 6, 2010
    San Jose, CA
    Dara
    Looking good. The close-focus is particularly impressive.
     
  7. STR

    STR Mu-43 Veteran

    221
    May 16, 2013
    The 12-35 is slightly wider at the short end than the 12-40. Quality is (as expected) fairly indistinguishable (thus far) and probably less than sample variation within either individual lens model.
     
  8. uscrx

    uscrx Mu-43 Top Veteran

    717
    Aug 26, 2011
    Shasta Cascade
    Just looking at this thread, I would go with 12-35mm.

    It's smaller and I like the color rendition of the lens.

    And personally, I don't need "40mm"

    I can either walk a little closer or if not, can stick a 45mm or 35-100mm
     
  9. Chris5107

    Chris5107 Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Jan 28, 2011
    USA
    Chris
    Thanks for the post. The comparison photos are very nice.

    On the EP-5 the 12-35 already feels big. The 12-40 is bigger but I don't think it is too much bigger to be a deal breaker for anyone who might think the 12-35 is OK.

    It will be interesting to see some of the detailed optical quality reviews but most likely, there will be some minor highs and lows for each lens and a photographer would do well with either one.

    The close focusing of the 12-40 along with the little extra reach is a definite + for Olympus.

    The optical IS (for some) and the smaller size is a definite + for the Panasonic.

    On thing I am interested in would be how these compare to the Olympus HG 4/3 lenses like the 14-45 II and others.
     
  10. CPWarner

    CPWarner Mu-43 Veteran

    244
    Dec 24, 2010
    Cliff
    I am very interested in the Olympus because of the manual focusing mechanism with a scale and hard stops. The inability to focus by wire on the Panasonic when trying to do some Astro photography with an Astrotrac is a pain. One has to prefocus to infinity in twilight, switch to manual, and wait a long time till it is dark and hope you do not bump the focus. So that implementation, if done right would be really nice. Looks promising, but I would like to test one. Ming Thein's review looks promising and the bokeh looks good.
     
  11. Kiwi Paul

    Kiwi Paul Mu-43 Top Veteran

    729
    Aug 15, 2011
    Aberdeen Scotland
    I used to own both versions of the 4/3 14-54 and the 12-60. The 12-35 is overall better than the 14-54's and at least as good as the 2-60.

    Paul

    Sent from my ME301T using Mu-43 mobile app
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. waffley

    waffley Mu-43 Rookie

    12
    Aug 28, 2012
    This is the comparison I have been waiting for! However I can't see any of the images, it looks like they have been removed.:confused:
    Did the images give any clues to the pros and cons of either lens please?
     
  13. jjbigfly

    jjbigfly Mu-43 Regular

    89
    Sep 6, 2013
    I cannot see them either.....
     
  14. Chris5107

    Chris5107 Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Jan 28, 2011
    USA
    Chris
    A picture I put together from a size comparison web site. These are the 12-40 and 12-35 on an E-P5.
     

    Attached Files:

    • Like Like x 5
  15. speedandstyle

    speedandstyle Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    It looks as if they are almost identical in diameter with the Olympus being about a half inch longer{14mm}. Of coarse this is in the collapsed position, wonder how they measure fully extended?

    One thing I will add is that I like the size and position of the zoom/focus rings much better on the Olympus{not that they are bad on the Panasonic}.
     
  16. meyerweb

    meyerweb Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Sep 5, 2011
    The Oly has a 62mm filter, the Panny 58mm. That would seem to indicate the Oly is a least a little bit larger in diameter. Which isn't really surprising, since a 40mm f/2.8 lens will pretty much need larger diameter glass than a 35mm f/2.8.
     
  17. Mike Ronesia

    Mike Ronesia Mu-43 Regular

    94
    Sep 16, 2013
    Saipan
    Mark James
    The Panny 12-35 was next on my wish list until I tried it and then it got bumped down. I'm not saying it got bumped down because I didn't like it, it was because when I tried it I also tried the 35-100 and I really liked the 35-100, which wasn't even on my list.

    Now I'm glad I waited because I can pick from these two after some reviews.
     
  18. speedandstyle

    speedandstyle Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Not necessarily. If you look the end{where the hood mounts} of the Olympus is wider than the Panasonic but at the mid point they are very close in size. BTW I did take them into photoshop and measure them and they are so close in diameter that it would only be a millimeter or so.
     
  19. Microman

    Microman Mu-43 Regular

    36
    Jan 16, 2012
    I can't compare the lenses, because the images are too small. Are there bigger versions of the comparison images?
     
  20. Jonathan F/2

    Jonathan F/2 Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 10, 2011
    Los Angeles, USA
    Looks like a win-win situation either way you go!
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.