Page 1 of 34 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 339

Thread: E-M5 or X-E1

  1. #1


    Default E-M5 or X-E1


    Can't help myself on this one. Love my E-M5, but I really like what Fuji does. And I really like their OOC JPEGs, even more than what Olympus can deliver.

    So, I thought I'd start a peaceful thread to get some opinions flowing on these two cameras as choices. We all know about the E-M5, ad nauseam I'm afraid. For the sake of discussion, and the lack of cameras actually being available, let's assume that the X-E1 will in fact deliver the same IQ as the X-Pro1 and will have greatly improved AF capabilities.

    My basic question is which system do you go with and why?

    Consider the following purchase options:

    E-M5 + 12-50 + 25/1.4 + 45/1.8 + 100-300 -- ~$2700 at B&H (or you can lose the 100-300, save $500, and make the comparison even)
    X-E1 + 18-55 + 35/1.4 + 60/2.8 -- ~$2600 at B&H

    Size of the cameras are very similar. E-M5 is 15mm higher and 4mm deeper, and weighs 50 grams more. X-E1 is 8mm wider. Interesting thing on height is that it's all in the pyramid topper for the E-M5. The X-E1 body is actually taller, which might make gripping it a bit easier.

    The lenses compare as follows:

    18-55 is 13mm shorter and 120 grams heavier than the 12-50.
    35/1.4 is same length as the 25/1.4 and weighs 13 grams less.
    60/2.8 is 15mm longer than the 45/1.8 and weighs 99 grams more.

    Other than the 60 vs the 45 it is more or less a wash IMO. From a performance standpoint the primes are all excellent, but it sure seems reasonable to think that the Fuji 18-55 will outclass the 12-50 (except for macro and weather sealing).

    One clear strength with is the diverse lens options available. The kits I'm comparing include a 100-300 zoom with the E-M5. No such option, or anything close, is available for the Fuji. Same on the wide side. 9-18 and 7-14 zooms are options in ; nothing compares on the Fuji side. You also have the crazy value lenses (ie 14/2.5; 40-150) with that Fuji is not going to match up with.

    I'm not going to list every difference in spec or feature, but some clearly exist. IBIS; built in flash; RAW support; touch screen; etc.

    So, what do you go with? Pure RF styling or vintage OM appeal? Max IQ or more diverse lens options? X or OMD?

    If I were starting fresh right now I'd be very tempted to go Fuji. But given the inertia that must be overcome to switch systems I'm thinking I will stick with Olympus.
    Last edited by demiro; September 6th, 2012 at 08:15 PM.

  2. The following member thanks demiro for this post:



  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,203
    Real Name
    Chris


    Default

    For me its just a matter of AF. I love what fuji has done with its cameras the last couple of years. but they cannot make em focus and manual focus on an x100 is literally non existent. I think ill jump on the "new fuji" when they manage to put a FF sensor in them and their AF is as fast as the OMD. then my OMD will be the backup, meanwhile, im more than happy with my OMD as my main camera!.

    Now in terms of camera design, i just love both, Olympus OMD and Fuji X whatever. great design. all of the other brands should learn from this two in terms of aesthetics of a camera IMO.

  4. The following member thanks Chrisnmn for this post:



  5. #3


    Default


    I can't deny the XE1 isn't attractive to me, but here's why I'm not pre-ordering.

    1) I've read the RAW decoding is finicky. I know you said jpg shooting, but it's so nice to have RAW if you need it. OMD has a simple and known RAW workflow.
    2) I like the two wheels that aren't dedicated, so I can have them do different things. Shot control and playback are both super customizable and comfortable.
    3) Breadth of lens selection, as you mentioned. Also, possibility for small back up bodies like the Pens.
    4) FL-600R flash. Nice, fast, versatile. Also, FL-300R nice and compact. Though likely my ignorance for Fuji flash is the real issue here.
    5) AF speed and shot-to-shot speed. I just saw a video on Youtube of the XPro 1 w/FW 2. The AF seems better, but still not up to OMD standards. That one, though, will have to be tested. See the video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=ca0YWDgE9wA It's interesting, but still inconclusive, IMO.
    6) The grip
    7) For me, I prefer to carry my larger camera (i.e. non pocket cams) on a Blackrapids sling strap. The OMD fits this set-up nicely. Not convinced the Fuji bricks will do that. They seem to want a 1/2 leather case and neck strap which, while sexy, is not comfortable to me.
    8) OMD has a side SD card slot, which is niggling, but I like.

    Reasons to look at the XE-1:
    1) Super cool, chic and sexy
    2) The lenses they do have look stellar. The 35/1.4 seems wonderful. I'm not a kit lens shooter, so the 18-55 isn't that interesting to me, but I like that it's fast.
    3) jpg output might be better, from what I've read. RAW, too, if you don't mind the non-LR workflow.
    4) Did I mention it's super cool and sexy?

    I'm guessing that, for me, most of the appeal for the XE1 is sex appeal, more than what I need (of course, that's why I got an EP1 more than 3 years ago). Would love to hear other's thoughts.

    Two other reasons NOT to switch from m43 to Fuji at this time: Nikon D600 and FF NEX. If I'm going to move, I really want to wait and look at a move to FF (or add in FF to my m43 kit). But that's just me.
    EP3, GX7, P20, O40-150, P100-300
    NEX6 w/MF lenses and RX100

  6. The following 2 members thank WT21 for this post:



  7. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    174


    Default

    i loved my X100 - i didnt find MF that bad - no worse than oly fly by wire (except the 12/2)
    i waiting for the tele f4 constant zoom - be it 70-200 or 55-200,
    one thing i need the X100 didnt have is the remote, which x-e1 has, the kit lens also seems attractive, much more than the 12-50

    You aren't going o be any lens bargains with the fuji, which is a consideration also - if i had the cash i'd go Fuji, the sensor & img processing is superb.
    .but ill sit on the fence a bit longer - ill keep my gx1 for now -
    if i had bought om-d id prob have to stick with it, but the gx1 keeps my options open - & the fact i bought my 12/2 & 45/1.8 s/hand so i will barely lose anything on them

    one last thing , screw FF - who wants the bulk-the aa filter on fuji's is top class
    oly e-pm1 with 14-150 (wife's now)
    GX1, 14/2.5,14-45,45/1.8 ,45-175 & 7.5/3.5 soon
    25/1.4 1" Pentax CCTV (for sale)
    OM adapter, 50/1.8 & OM 135mm prime

    flickr


  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    1,710
    Real Name
    Promit Roy


    Default

    With Fuji you're probably going to see better (but fewer) lenses, better images, and way worse speed/performance. That's always been the problem with Fuji. Usability is probably a toss up. Beyond that, there's really not a lot to split the cameras. Either way, I think it's worth holding out for early XE1 reviews. The 18-55 f/2.8-4 is the sort of lens that SHOULD have shipped with the EM5, still bitter about the 12-50 junker we got.
    Last edited by Promit; September 6th, 2012 at 08:29 PM.
    Olympus E-M5, Panasonic GH4, Sony A77 II, lenses.


  9. #6
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Jersey Shore
    Posts
    1,234
    Real Name
    Steve


    Default


    I wouldn't preorder the Fuji right now. But if the reviews indicate that auto-focus is solid, then I'd go for it. That is, as long as you're fine with Fuji's lens selection, which can't compete with the more-mature micro four thirds system yet. But that may change.
    Olympus E-M5, Zuiko 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6, Zuiko 12-50mm, Zuiko 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ, Zuiko 14-150mm f/4.0-5.6, Zuiko 40-150 f/4.0-5.6 R, Zuiko 15mm body-cap lens, Zuiko 17mm f/1.8, Zuiko 25mm f/1.8, Zuiko 45mm f/1.8, Zuiko 60mm f/2.8 macro

    Lumix 45-150mm f/4-5.6, Lumix 100-300mm f/4-5.6, Lumix 14mm f/2.5, Lumix 20mm f/1.7


  10. #7


    Default

    I'd go with the Fuji because of the sensor. It really is that good!

    I'm also not sure why RAW decoding would be "finicky". I only shoot RAW, and shooting with my Fuji and then converting the RAWs is no more finicky than with any other camera that shoots RAW. In fact, it's not finicky at all - Lightroom takes are of everything, including keeping my archive organized.


  11. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    7,006
    Real Name
    Nic


    Default

    The E-M5 has too many useful features for me to give it up in a one-or-the-other decision between it or the X-E1, and I don't really have any great affection towards the old school looks and controls of the Fuji. The basic hardware of the Fuji looks fantastic, however. It remains to be seen of course, but I have a feeling that the Fuji zoom lens will be a good bit better than the Olympus zoom. Scary thought: the X-E1 would probably make a nice companion to the E-M5.
    Nic
    E-M1, E-M5, GH1
    Flickr Photostream

    "Don't tell me that you're a good photographer.
    Don't tell me that you have an amazing camera.
    Show me."

  12. The following member thanks Luckypenguin for this post:



  13. #9


    Default

    I was waiting for this thread to pop up but I didn't want to make it!

    Anyhow, for now I'm going to sit on my E-M5. I love the IBIS, quick operation, and small size with the 20/1.7. However, I'd love a brick shaped body with RF controls.

    We can talk about the trade offs until we die but it'll really be a balance on what matters most to oneself.

    Talking about camera bodies reminds me of guy ramblings about deciding which woman is better - anyone recall the crazy/hot scale?

    To me, it feels like the X-E1 is the hotter one with a crazier personality. Can you live with it? ;)

    2x E-M5+HLD-6 | Lumix G X Vario 12-35mm f/2.8 | Lumix G X Vario 35-100mm f/2.8

    Flickr

  14. The following 4 members thank drewbot for this post:



  15. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    7,006
    Real Name
    Nic


    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rudi View Post
    I'd go with the Fuji because of the sensor. It really is that good!

    I'm also not sure why RAW decoding would be "finicky". I only shoot RAW, and shooting with my Fuji and then converting the RAWs is no more finicky than with any other camera that shoots RAW. In fact, it's not finicky at all - Lightroom takes are of everything, including keeping my archive organized.
    The non-standard colour matrix of the X-Pro1 (different to that in the X100) still apparently causes problems for third-party raw convertors.
    Nic
    E-M1, E-M5, GH1
    Flickr Photostream

    "Don't tell me that you're a good photographer.
    Don't tell me that you have an amazing camera.
    Show me."



Page 1 of 34 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Links on this page may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

Latest Discussions

[Showcase] Olympus 45mm f/1.8 ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
GX-7 EVF ( 1 2 3)

Inspired Eye

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.3.0