|
LeicaPlace |
|
|
18Thanks
 |
|
|

January 29th, 2013, 06:32 AM
|
|
|
Really looking forward to the reviews and tests. I have the Leica 14-150mm which is superb, if a little slow AF on the E-M5 ,so I have something for a direct comparison. Will they eventually make it for other formats?
David
__________________
Pbase Galleries:-
http://www.pbase.com/davidmorisonimages
E-M5, Leica 14-150mm, ED 7-14mm, ED 75-300mm, EC14, EX25, Lensbaby Scout, FL50R, Metz MS1.
Canon 7D, Canon EF 400mm f5.6 L, Canon 40mm f2.8 STM, Tokina 12-24mm f4, Tokina 100mm f2.8 Macro, Pentax SMC 500mm f4.5
National Geographic Expedition Carbon, Lensmaster RH1 Gimbal head.
"It is better to light a single candle than curse the darkness" - Confucius (551–479 BC)
|

January 29th, 2013, 06:53 AM
|
 |
Snickering Hall of Fame
|
|
|
|
No comparison pics, but from the look of it, it is smaller than the super zoom for the NEX. I already have the Oly 14-150 so I won't be looking to buy this Tamron. But it's exciting to see another third party making native AF lenses for m4/3.
__________________
OMD
14/2.5 17/1.8 17/2.8 25/1.4 45/1.8 75/1.8 12-50 14-150
My FlickR!
|

January 29th, 2013, 07:17 AM
|
|
|
Interesting. If the price is right (and the performance is OK) I might be tempted to get one as a 'do everything' lens. I find the current options a little too expensive for what I get quality wise.
__________________
EOS: 5DII, 30DIR, 24-105L, 35L, 135L, 15/2.8 FE, Σ 50/1.4, Σ 105/2.8 macro
Mu43: GF2, E-M5, P14/2.5, P20/1.7, O45/1.8, P7-14, O12-50, P12-35, P100-300
Legacy: Contax Zeiss 50/1.4, 35/2.8, Leica R 50/2.0, 28/2.8, Pentax 50/1.7
|

January 29th, 2013, 07:57 AM
|
 |
Mu-43 All-Pro
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Some call it the arm pit of NYC.
Posts: 1,497
usayit's Gallery
|
|
GREAT!
Tamron is well known and makes big bucks for their super zoom lenses. Dealers are probably happy as its often easier to make a larger profit packaging Tamron superzooms with body as a custom kit than it is with a direct kit. Usually targeting family amateur shooters...
Of course, I don't know how well Pan. and Oly. treat their dealers.. just a guess.
Judging from the pics, it looks like a lens specifically designed for the micro 4/3 system.... that's good news too from Tamron.
__________________
Reminder to Myself: Aggressively Apply Smilies
|

January 29th, 2013, 08:39 AM
|
 |
Mu-43 Regular
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sherbrooke, Canada
Posts: 178
Real Name: Eric Cote Talanis's Gallery
|
|
Interesting but can you really get good image quality from those 10x zooms?
|

January 29th, 2013, 08:46 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talanis
Interesting but can you really get good image quality from those 10x zooms?
|
Depends on your definition of "good".
|

January 29th, 2013, 08:50 AM
|
 |
Mu-43 Regular
|
|
|
|
At the very least, we can expect it to be priced better than the Panasonic and Olympus superzooms. Should be a nice family-friendly lens for newcomers or for putting on a second body for a spouse/kid.
__________________
Oly OMD EM5 | P14mm f2.5 | Σ19mm f2.8 | PL25mm f1.4 | O45mm f1.8 | P14-42 | P45-200
Minolta XG-M | Rokkor-X 35mm f2.8
Canon AE-1 P | 28mm f2.8 S.C. | 50mm f1.8 | Sears 135mm f2.8 | Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f3.5 Macro
|

January 29th, 2013, 08:59 AM
|
|
|
Interesting, but doesn't really offer anything for an Olympus camera owner unless the price is crazy low and it's sharper than the Olympus version. Panasonic camera owners would need this to beat the Lumix 14-140 but I've never tested it.
Bravo to Tamron for making this lens, I hope it sells well, but I'm not as impressed as I would like to be.
__________________
OM-D E-M5 || O12-50 | P45-175 | P100-300 | PL25 | O45
Adapted: Minolta MD 28/2.8 Celtic, MD 35/1.8, MD 50/1.4, MD 85/2.0, MD 200/2.8, Nikon 100/2.8 E
Wish List: GH3, 12/2.0, 17/1.8, 75/1.8, Oly ZD FT SHG 300/2.8
Pentax K-5, K-01 || 18-135 WR | Sigma 30/1.4
|

January 29th, 2013, 09:23 AM
|
|
Mu-43 Top Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 802
Real Name: Dean demiro's Gallery
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevwilfoto
Interesting, but doesn't really offer anything for an Olympus camera owner unless the price is crazy low and it's sharper than the Olympus version. Panasonic camera owners would need this to beat the Lumix 14-140 but I've never tested it.
Bravo to Tamron for making this lens, I hope it sells well, but I'm not as impressed as I would like to be.
|
That sums up my reaction as well. Coming from Canon-land, Tamron is known for making a very capable 17-50/2.8 that is very high value, and a 28-75/2.8 that is also in that same category. I was hoping (am hoping) we see something along those lines for  . There is a standard fast zoom gap in this format, unless you want to shell out four figures for the Panny 12-35. No such gap in the 14-150 range.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
More Discussions |
|
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
|
|
More Member Ads |
|
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
|
|
FTC Disclosure |
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.
|
|