Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Micro 4/3 News, Rumors, and Featured Forum Posts > Front Page News and Rumors

Front Page News and Rumors News and rumors posted by our staff to the site front page

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree20Thanks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old September 24th, 2012, 12:12 PM
Amin Sabet's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA (United States)
Posts: 6,862
Real Name: Amin
Amin Sabet's Gallery
Default DxOmark Finally Tests the Olympus OM-D E-M5

In perhaps the most anticipated and overdue sensor test of all time, DxOmark has finally tested the Olympus OM-D E-M5 sensor. We may never know why it took this long, but I'm thankful they decided to publish it after all this time.

Link: DxOMark - Olympus OM-D E-M5: The best of the micro 4:3 cameras

Those of us who have been using the OM-D E-M5 for a while won't be surprised by the DxOmark test results. Keep in mind that DxOmark reports have some limitations. Most importantly, they don't give you a sense of how the numbers and charts translate into real life results. For example, they tell you that the E-M5 has 1.7EV more dynamic range than a Panasonic G3 or GX1 (at base ISO), but you need additional experience or examples to show you how a 1.7EV difference affects pictures.

Another thing I'd like to clarify is that when DxOmark talks about "manufacturer ISO" (aka nominal ISO) vs "measured ISO", people often think DxOmark's measured ISO is the "real" ISO while any deviation from this by the manufacturer is "overrating" (manufacturer ISO > measured) or "underrated" (manufacturer ISO < measured). Sometimes people go as far as to accuse manufacturers of "cheating", ie purposely misrating their ISO values to do better in tests. All of this is misunderstanding.

To simplify things, manufacturers all specify an ISO based on the brightness that a JPEG will display for a given exposure (determined by shutter speed, aperture, and lighting conditions). RAW processors like Adobe Lightroom will automatically apply a similar tone curve to the in-camera processor in order to get the default conversion to the same overall brightness level as the in-camera JPEG. So for a given lighting condition, a Panasonic picture at f/2.8, 1/100s, ISO 400 will look as bright as an Olympus picture taken at f/2.8, 1/100s, ISO 400.

Olympus tends to want more highlight headroom in the files at the expense of shadow latitude, so what they call ISO 400 usually corresponds to a lower level of analog gain (sensitivity) than what Panasonic calls ISO 400. This is why DxOmark says that Olympus ISO 400 is measured ISO 214. In order to give you the same final brightness, the Olympus file gets "pushed" by the in-camera tone curve (or Lightroom, etc) more than the Panasonic file gets "pushed" by its tone curve. In other words, an Olympus camera will choose a faster shutter speed in order to preserve the highlights, push the file enough to get the same overall brightness (as a Panasonic file with a longer exposure), and as a result the Olympus RAW file will have noisier shadows and more more highlight detail than a Panasonic using the same sensor.

Depending on the testing methods used, this may result in the Olympus camera being disadvantaged during noise testing, exactly the opposite of what people usually say when they accuse Olympus of "cheating" by "overrating" their ISO. It may also result in a false advantage for highlight testing, and will certainly result in a false advantage for most DR measurements based on in-camera JPEG testing (most review outfits).

DxOmark uses an arbitrary definition of ISO which relates the camera sensitivity to the amount of highlight headroom for that given sensitivity. It's a great way for them to standardize results when testing many different cameras from different manufacturers. However, DxOmark's definition of ISO (measured ISO) is non-standard and actually technically less correct than the definition which the manufacturers use (which corresponds to one of the standard definitions of ISO.

So what can we take away from the DxOmark results?

First, Micro 4/3 as a system has closed the dynamic range gap with APS-C cameras. The latest Sony NEX cameras maintain a slim margin advantage in this aspect (less than half a stop for the NEX-5N), while the E-M5 (and by extension the E-PL5, E-PM2, and probably GH3) sensor's DR now exceeds that of any previously measured APS-C sensor from a Canon or Samsung camera.

Second, the Micro 4/3 system is now punching above its weight in terms of low light high ISO performance. The E-M5 sensor tested only 0.3 stops worse than the NEX cameras in this category, whereas one would expect a 0.7 stop disadvantage based on format size. In other words, it would take a stabilized 33mm f/1.6 lens on a Sony NEX body to match the low light capability of the Panasonic Leica 25mm f/1.4 lens on a current Olympus body, or a stabilized f/3.2 zoom to match the low light capability of the Panasonic 12-35mm zoom on the GH3 (assuming that camera uses the same sensor).

These are small differences. The bottom line is that the E-M5 sensor is a step forward for the system. Whether these sensor advances help us make substantially better photos is an entirely separate discussion. I'd argue that for most people under most circumstances, the answer is no.
__________________
Amin
Mu-43.com Webmaster (Site FAQ | Help Forum | My Disclosures | My Flickriver | My G+ Profile)

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates. We get a small referral fee when you buy after clicking our link. Your price is unaffected.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 24th, 2012, 12:34 PM
jloden's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hunterdon County, NJ
Posts: 1,965
Real Name: Jay
jloden's Gallery
Default

Glad to see the test results, even if just to give an approximate placing for the OM-D EM-5 up against APS-C sensors since it helps people understand about where our format sits in the scheme of things.

Things I'm interested in most going forward (I'm assuming the GH3 tests about the same):

1) What the next crop of APS-C sensor results looks like. Sony and Nikon have taken some pretty big jumps into MF territory when it comes to dynamic range on the latest FF sensors. I'm curious to see how that trickles down to the APS-C lines.

2) What the Fuji X-Pro1 / X-E1 sensor results look like. The X100 rating is about even with the OM-D results, but I'd be very interested to see where the X-Pro1 sensor rates comparatively.
__________________
500px | flickr

“The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.” -- Dorothea Lange
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 24th, 2012, 12:49 PM
Djarum's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 2,518
Real Name: Jason
Djarum's Gallery
Default

I can't wait until the E-PL5 comes out. With this sensor, I think Olympus will have an excllent entry and mid-level products with really good IQ.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 24th, 2012, 12:50 PM
krugorg's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Minnesota USA
Posts: 2,164
krugorg's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jloden View Post

2) What the Fuji X-Pro1 / X-E1 sensor results look like. The X100 rating is about even with the OM-D results, but I'd be very interested to see where the X-Pro1 sensor rates comparatively.
I am guessing this would be somewhere in the range of the NEX-5N to Pentax K-01, since it is the same sensor (apart from the Fuji color filter implementation, etc.)?
__________________
Kyle / E-M5 and E-PM2
Flickr Photostream
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 24th, 2012, 12:53 PM
RT_Panther's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,865
RT_Panther's Gallery
Arrow

Hopefully now, there won't as much negativity towards Sony as there used to be & instead, Olympus users can enjoy the same symbiotic relationship that Sony/Pentax/Nikon users enjoy (since the OMD has a Sony fab'd sensor)
__________________
Olympus E-PL5
M. Zuiko 17mm ƒ1.8 | M. Zuiko 17mm ƒ2.8 | M. Zuiko 14-42 II | M. Zuiko 14-150 ED | M. Zuiko 45mm ƒ1.8 ED | M. Zuiko 75mm ƒ1.8 ED | M. Zuiko 75-300 ED II | Leica DG Summilux 25mm ƒ1.4 ASPH | Lumix G Vario 45-200 |
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 24th, 2012, 01:02 PM
Jonathan F/2's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 2,108
Jonathan F/2's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RT_Panther View Post
Hopefully now, there won't as much negativity towards Sony as there used to be & instead, Olympus users can enjoy the same symbiotic relationship that Sony/Pentax/Nikon users enjoy (since the OMD has a Sony fab'd sensor)
I'm not sure I like Sony being the only game in town. I'm surprised Canon hasn't leveraged their sensor development to other manufacturers. Who knows, maybe Panasonic's FF aspirations may involve Canon in order to combat Sony's stills and video dominance!
__________________
Jonathan
--
www.jonathanfriolo.com

Last edited by Jonathan F/2; September 24th, 2012 at 01:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 24th, 2012, 01:08 PM
RT_Panther's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,865
RT_Panther's Gallery
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan F/2 View Post
I'm surprised Canon hasn't leveraged their sensor development to other manufacturers.
Perhaps Canon didn't want to - in much the same way that Panasonic gave Olympus the shaft (IMHO)......

Panasonic left Olympus little choice.....
Thanked by goldenlight.
__________________
Olympus E-PL5
M. Zuiko 17mm ƒ1.8 | M. Zuiko 17mm ƒ2.8 | M. Zuiko 14-42 II | M. Zuiko 14-150 ED | M. Zuiko 45mm ƒ1.8 ED | M. Zuiko 75mm ƒ1.8 ED | M. Zuiko 75-300 ED II | Leica DG Summilux 25mm ƒ1.4 ASPH | Lumix G Vario 45-200 |
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old September 24th, 2012, 01:09 PM
RT_Panther's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,865
RT_Panther's Gallery
Arrow

Addendum:
And it wouldn't surprise me at all if part of the reason why Fuji went APS-C instead of Micro Four Thirds is because Panasonic gave Fuji the shaft too in the sensor department....
Thanked by Bokeaji.
__________________
Olympus E-PL5
M. Zuiko 17mm ƒ1.8 | M. Zuiko 17mm ƒ2.8 | M. Zuiko 14-42 II | M. Zuiko 14-150 ED | M. Zuiko 45mm ƒ1.8 ED | M. Zuiko 75mm ƒ1.8 ED | M. Zuiko 75-300 ED II | Leica DG Summilux 25mm ƒ1.4 ASPH | Lumix G Vario 45-200 |
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old September 24th, 2012, 01:10 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 77
phl0wtography's Gallery
Default

Unfortunately they haven't tested any of the nice mFT primes (12,14,17,20,25,45) on the OM-D's sensor. Now THAT's what I'd be interested in, how those lenses perform on the 16mp Sony sensor.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old September 24th, 2012, 01:10 PM
krugorg's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Minnesota USA
Posts: 2,164
krugorg's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan F/2 View Post
I'm not sure I like Sony being the only game in town. I'm surprised Canon hasn't leveraged their sensor development to other manufacturers. Who knows, maybe Panasonic's FF aspirations may involve Canon, in order to combat Sony's stills and video dominance!
+1 ... good to have some competition with sensors, just like with the camera systems. Hope Panasonic continues pushing, Canon steps it up, and we see new stuff from the smaller guys (Aptina, CMOSIS).

Aptina new 1" sensor with 1080p/120fps
__________________
Kyle / E-M5 and E-PM2
Flickr Photostream
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
The moon ( 1 2 3)
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com