Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Other Discussions > Other Systems

Other Systems Photography with systems other than Micro 4/3

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree29Thanks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old November 15th, 2011, 09:53 AM
WT21's Avatar
Ninja Gear Churner
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North East
Posts: 4,127
WT21's Gallery
Default Wow! Fuji CSC Leak!

The Reason I don't care about Nikon One Series or NEX CSC. Waiting for something like this:

Fuji mirrorless camera leaked | Photo Rumors

Fuji CSC!

Look at the pic of the camera from top down. Blow it up to get closer look. It has a 1.4 lens mounted on it! Maybe a 35mm 1.4 on an APS-C sensor????????

I'd fall over faint if that is what I'm seeing. If the body was <$2,000 I'd sell my Jeep Wrangler to get it!

If it was full frame, I'd just plain lose my marbles.

Fuji -- I'm waitin' on you! Let's see what you got!
Thanked by eno789, Bhupinder2002 and shnitz.
__________________
EM5; 9-18, PL25, 100-300 and some others.
(also, 6D + RX100)

Last edited by WT21; November 15th, 2011 at 09:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 15th, 2011, 09:56 AM
Linh's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,248
Linh's Gallery
Default

damn, not exactly small, heh. but I just welcome the move to mirrorless.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 15th, 2011, 10:20 AM
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,864
Real Name: Luke
Luke's Gallery
Default

I am also excited to see more, but I don't think you'll be able to call a "C"SC. If it's APS-C or full frame as some expect, it can not be compact....especially if you plan on putting a zoom or tele lens on it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 15th, 2011, 10:32 AM
addieleman's Avatar
Untalented amateur
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,042
Real Name: Ad
addieleman's Gallery
Default

I'd be more than happy to get a camera with a bigger sensor and less noise at base ISO, even if it is larger. In my case lenses and tripod determine the size and weight of the bag; I couldn't care less if the camera is a little larger. For me the Sony route with the NEX-7 is the way to go, I think this dual optical/electronic viewfinder will die out as soon as EVF's become better and better.
__________________
Best regards, Ad.

Pictures | Equipment | Minolta collection | All lenses
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 15th, 2011, 10:43 AM
WT21's Avatar
Ninja Gear Churner
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North East
Posts: 4,127
WT21's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke View Post
I am also excited to see more, but I don't think you'll be able to call a "C"SC. If it's APS-C or full frame as some expect, it can not be compact....especially if you plan on putting a zoom or tele lens on it.
I agree, though for me, I don't think I'd put a tele lens on it. Or a zoom. Just a three prime kit.
__________________
EM5; 9-18, PL25, 100-300 and some others.
(also, 6D + RX100)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 15th, 2011, 10:45 AM
Jonathan F/2's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 2,106
Jonathan F/2's Gallery
Default

From the looks of it, Fuji isn't aiming towards M43 or NEX, they're gunning for Leica. Slap a couple native lenses and a Leica mount adapter and you pretty much have an M9 killer.

As a Nikon guy, if they got some special sensor in there, I wouldn't mind if they release a follow up to their F-mount S5...Fuji S6 Pro in a D700 chassis would be sick!
Thanked by shnitz.
__________________
Jonathan
--
www.jonathanfriolo.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 15th, 2011, 10:52 AM
linkedit's Avatar
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 644
linkedit's Gallery
Default

If they can deliver the goods on this one with the larger sensor, goodbye M43
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 15th, 2011, 10:58 AM
Iansky's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Cotswolds, UK
Posts: 1,516
Iansky's Gallery
Send a message via Skype™ to Iansky
Default Fuji pushing the boat

I suspect that like me, many others thought the X100 was very much a "Test the water" camera to see if people liked the styling and hybrid finder as well as the sensor quality and a fixed lens version was cheaper than changable lenses in case of lack of take up.

It appears the majority of people who own the X100 like it and are more than pleased with the quality of image, the main criticism appears to be based around focus but as I am not an X100 owner / user and have never used one, I cannot comment.

If there is any truth in the rumour it could be the water was warm and Fuji have decided to proceed with a CSC albeit APS-C sensor - the images show what appears to be a fairly large bodied camera with what looks like a rangefinder / X100 style viwefinder window and another shots shows what looks like a lever to swop the frame lines in the same way Leica rangefinders do.

It will be interesting to see how this all manifests itself in a production model and it could be a serious contender to current CSC's as well as Leica providing build quality, reliability and optics are all up to scratch and the price is sensible.

As much as I rate and love Leica's including my M8.2, I like many others have experienced issues with reliability and had the long frustrating absence while waiting for Leica Solms to do their bit - I do also feel I am using it on borrowed time and even more so now that Kodak has gone into demise - does Leica have sufficient spare sensors to cope with known / but not admitted issues?

If the right camera at the right price comes along, I may just be tempted to trade my M8.2 in..............I would miss it though as it is a superb piece of build equipment when working efficiently!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 15th, 2011, 11:04 AM
WT21's Avatar
Ninja Gear Churner
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North East
Posts: 4,127
WT21's Gallery
Default

Two issues with the X100 as I understand it (not owning one myself) -- focusing and some with sticky aperture blades. Certainly sounds like they're trying to be like Leica, complete with quirky issues :)
__________________
EM5; 9-18, PL25, 100-300 and some others.
(also, 6D + RX100)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old November 15th, 2011, 11:13 AM
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,864
Real Name: Luke
Luke's Gallery
Default

Fuji X100 is to Leica X1 as
Fuji LX is to Leica M9

Leica will be in more trouble than m4/3
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com