Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Accessories

Accessories Bags, cases, flashes, tripods, and other Micro 4/3 accesories

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree5Thanks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #21  
Old May 8th, 2012, 11:09 AM
TDP's Avatar
TDP TDP is offline
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,243
TDP's Gallery
Default

Multi coated is a treatment to the glass...any filter can be multicoated.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old May 8th, 2012, 11:43 AM
Ned's Avatar
Ned Ned is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,086
Ned's Gallery
Send a message via MSN to Ned Send a message via Skype™ to Ned
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willabeast View Post
I'm looking on line and seeing huge price differences. For the 58 mm size the price ranges from $8.85 for a Vivitar brand to $290 for a Heliopan. That's a heck of a range!
My basic guideline is this: Hoya or better. :)

In other words, Hoya is the minimum quality I will use, although there are a few others which are better such as Heliopan, B+W, Singh Ray, etc. The Hoyas are affordable, but offer good enough quality that you shouldn't be able to tell much difference.

You might also see a brand called Kenko Pro-1 (as a side note, Kenko is part of Tokina and they are now part of the Micro Four-Thirds Consortium - yay!). They are not available in all areas, but where they are available they are usually cheaper than Hoya but use the exact same glass and construction as the Hoya PR0-1D series. Great quality to value ratio. :)
Thanked by eno789.
__________________
Olympus E-3 | Olympus E-PL2 PEN | Olympus E-PM1 PEN | Zuiko ED 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 SWD | Zuiko 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 | Vivitar 100mm f/2.8 Macro | Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/2.8 | Konica Hexanon 50mm f/1.4 | Konica Hexanon 85mm f/1.8 | G.Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 | Zuiko 35mm f/3.5 Macro | Zuiko 25mm f/2.8 | KMZ Jupiter-3 50mm f/1.5 | E.Zuiko 200mm f/4 | Zuiko 75-150mm f/4 | Olympus EC-14 teleconverter | VF-2 and VF-3 Viewfinders | EMA-1 Mic Adapter | Olympus FL-36R and FL-50R speedlights

cyclopsphoto.ca
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old May 8th, 2012, 12:10 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 362
The Minimalist's Gallery
Default

Which type is better, linear or circular?
__________________
Darren
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old May 8th, 2012, 12:11 PM
RT_Panther's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,869
RT_Panther's Gallery
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willabeast View Post
based on reading this thread I'm thinking of buying 2 lower cost filters for the lenses
You might want to re-think whether or not you want to get lower cost filters.
--> Best of the photography forums - tutorials: Cheap filters and Bokeh .

This is not to advocate getting the most expensive filters but rather the best filters
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old May 8th, 2012, 12:58 PM
DeeJayK's Avatar
Ignorant Know-It-All
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA
Posts: 1,997
Real Name: Keith
DeeJayK's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Minimalist View Post
Which type is better, linear or circular?
You want a circular polarizer (which is basically a linear polarizer with an additional circular polarizing element). This article does a much more thorough job of explaining why than I could.
Thanked by The Minimalist.
__________________
Sarcasm is my default tone, so please consider that before taking offense to the preceding message.

Criticism (no matter how harsh) is welcomed of ANY and ALL images I post.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old May 8th, 2012, 01:24 PM
rparmar's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Limerick, Ireland
Posts: 286
rparmar's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhazeghi View Post
Here's a brief but informative page on buying polarizing filters.
I followed that link only to find an article I'd forgotten writing!

I will re-iterate that price does not conform to quality in every instance. Heliopan for example are over-priced and perform no better than much cheaper filters. I recommend looking for:
  • "B+W MRC", but not "B+W MRC Slim" (no front ring) or "B+W Kaesemann MRC" (expensive)
  • Marumi DHG or Fujiyama DHG (same manufacturer, but not found in all markets)
  • Hoya Pro1 Digital, but not other variations (and there are many)

I have also found step-up rings to be a PITA. They are often hard to unscrew from a thin-line CP filter, since it turns (naturally).
__________________
Listen to my new album "The Drones" free on BandCamp. Visit my Flickr images, website, or blog. Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old May 8th, 2012, 02:03 PM
NJH NJH is offline
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South West England
Posts: 164
NJH's Gallery
Default

Just a note for UK readers, I recently picked up one of those Marumi DHG polarisers from fotosense on a huge price reduction. It was 30 something pounds.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com