Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Accessories

Accessories Bags, cases, flashes, tripods, and other Micro 4/3 accesories

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old July 16th, 2012, 04:43 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 286
strang's Gallery
Default Filters

So I bought a bunch of new filters.

A circular polarizer.

A variable neutral density.

A 2-stop graduated neutral density.

All are 77mm in size. I would always keep a 35mm kit. Been keeping in touch with Nikon D600 rumours. Sorry no Canon for me. Nikon CLS is just magical.

Then I looked at step up rings.

Ouch. I'm going to need a 52-77mm, a 58-77mm. For sure.

But how do you guys feel about step ups from 37mm and 46mm? Should I get them to step up to 52mm, or 58mm? Cause 37-77mm and 46-77mm doesn't exist.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 16th, 2012, 05:11 PM
mister_roboto's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 417
Real Name: Dennis
mister_roboto's Gallery
Default

I used step up for my Panasonic pancakes. They work fine, the only problem was that they look weird small lens with over sized filter on it. I think I was using a 58mm to 46mm. eventually I just got the 46mm ones, but I don't use as many filters are you (pretty much just ND + SPL only, and nice that the 2 pancakes I own are the same size)- so it wasn't too bad.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 16th, 2012, 05:21 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 308
EP1-GF1's Gallery
Default

I think, apart from looking a bit funny, all that weight on the 20mm's focus mechanism might be a bad idea in the long run. I have no evidence for saying that of course :) but I felt I might be pushing it with a 52mm. I wouldn't be so concerned if it was the 14mm lens as that's got any moving parts externally, likewise with the 45mm.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 16th, 2012, 05:39 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 286
strang's Gallery
Default

I'm rarely going to leave a filter on for a long time.

The ND is only used when I want to use longer shutter times in daylight, or use a lens wide open.

The polarizer is only used when I want certain effects from the sky and vegetation.

The grad is used the least. Landscapes where the highlight will be blown.

The choice of stepping to 52mm vs. stepping to 58mm boils down to which zooms I would keep I guess. Good thing step up rings are cheap. Most of them are $2 including shipping.

Kind of leaning toward 52mm.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old July 16th, 2012, 05:58 PM
mister_roboto's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 417
Real Name: Dennis
mister_roboto's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EP1-GF1 View Post
I think, apart from looking a bit funny, all that weight on the 20mm's focus mechanism might be a bad idea in the long run. I have no evidence for saying that of course :) but I felt I might be pushing it with a 52mm. I wouldn't be so concerned if it was the 14mm lens as that's got any moving parts externally, likewise with the 45mm.
Yeah- that 20mm focusing. I stuck a thick diopter on there once, the motor whirred to a stop.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com