Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Accessories

Accessories Bags, cases, flashes, tripods, and other Micro 4/3 accesories

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree1Thanks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old September 13th, 2010, 02:34 AM
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 749
jambaj0e's Gallery
Default Any thoughts on the National Geographic Explorer NG 2343 Small Shoulder Bag?

Now that the Tamrac Express 5,6 and 7 are out of the question for my Olympus E-PL1, I'm looking at the National Geographic NG 2343 Earth Explorer Small Shoulder Bag. Thing that I'm kinda worried about this is that it's a little thick. Any comments/experience on it? I really like this bag BECAUSE it doesn't look like a camera bag

National Geographic NG 2343 Earth Explorer Small NG 2343 - B&H



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 13th, 2010, 02:35 AM
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 749
jambaj0e's Gallery
Default



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 13th, 2010, 04:43 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 42
Carol Stee's Gallery
Default

The NG Explorer 2343 is appealing because it looks like a safari bag and not a camera bag, and it's made of cotton-hemp and not a synthetic. But it's 22cm/8.6" high, which is too deep for the Olympus E-PL1 with its small body and lenses, unless you have a long zoom lens that needs the space. And since it is only 16cm/6" wide it's too narrow to put the E-PL1 with a lens attached and another lens side by side. Instead the equipment has to be stacked, which means you'll have to take things out of the top to get to the bottom.

Consider the Domke F-5XB. It's similar to the NG bag because it's made of cotton and it doesn't look like a camera bag. It's 25cm/10" wide, 18cm/7.25" high, and 11cm/4.5" deep, long enough to put the E-PL1 with a zoom lens attached, a lens under the camera, and an extra lens beside it. It's a great take everywhere bag because it has space for extra lenses but it's not big enough to be a burden to carry for long periods of time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 13th, 2010, 05:46 PM
greyelm's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 341
Real Name: Malcolm
greyelm's Gallery
Default

I have the NG2345 (Medium) and I think it's great. The removeable padded insert can be adjusted and the camera can be put in left side down (from the back) which makes it easy to grab & remove. Lots of pockets for odds and ends.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 14th, 2010, 09:14 AM
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 749
jambaj0e's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greyelm View Post
I have the NG2345 (Medium) and I think it's great. The removeable padded insert can be adjusted and the camera can be put in left side down (from the back) which makes it easy to grab & remove. Lots of pockets for odds and ends.
Can you take pictures of the bag next to the gears you carry, and several pictures with you or someone else wearing it? That way I can see how big it is relative to the gear and person. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 14th, 2010, 01:55 PM
greyelm's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 341
Real Name: Malcolm
greyelm's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jambaj0e View Post
Can you take pictures of the bag next to the gears you carry, and several pictures with you or someone else wearing it? That way I can see how big it is relative to the gear and person. Thanks!
I won't be able to do much for a few days but in the meantime there is a video review on this Amazon review page. By the way I should have said 'Midi' , medium is the next one up.


Amazon.co.uk: Customer Reviews: National Geographic Midi Shoulder Bag

This is on the shoulder


Last edited by greyelm; September 14th, 2010 at 02:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 15th, 2010, 02:23 AM
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 749
jambaj0e's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carol Stee View Post
The NG Explorer 2343 is appealing because it looks like a safari bag and not a camera bag, and it's made of cotton-hemp and not a synthetic. But it's 22cm/8.6" high, which is too deep for the Olympus E-PL1 with its small body and lenses, unless you have a long zoom lens that needs the space. And since it is only 16cm/6" wide it's too narrow to put the E-PL1 with a lens attached and another lens side by side. Instead the equipment has to be stacked, which means you'll have to take things out of the top to get to the bottom.
Are you sure that the big would be too small to put the E-PL1 in one pocket and a lens in the other side? Here's a pic from Amazon. I want to stay light with space for a E-PL1 w/ kit lens (laid on its side with the lens facing to the back of the bag) and one other zoom lens/prime lens



Here's a Flickr photo with two lens in it:


Thanked by Carol Stee.

Last edited by jambaj0e; September 15th, 2010 at 02:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old September 15th, 2010, 03:09 AM
Jamus's Avatar
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 128
Jamus's Gallery
Default

It looks great. Personally, I hate having shoulderbags, as that shoulder begins to weigh on me after a while. Backpacks support the weight a lot better, and make it easier to trek (no bump...bump...bump as the bag hits your side while you go up some hill or another).

So for normal walking, and short trips it should be fine. However for a day-long trip... I'd go find a good backpack camera bag.

Just my two cents. :]
__________________
Nikon: D300s, D5000(for sale), SB-600, 35mmf1.8, 60mmf2.8 Micro, 18-200f3.5-5.6, 24-70mmf2.8, 58mm Voightlander f1.4 (for sale)
Panasonic: GF1 w/ 20mmf1.7
flickr
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old September 15th, 2010, 04:12 AM
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 749
jambaj0e's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamus View Post
It looks great. Personally, I hate having shoulderbags, as that shoulder begins to weigh on me after a while. Backpacks support the weight a lot better, and make it easier to trek (no bump...bump...bump as the bag hits your side while you go up some hill or another).

So for normal walking, and short trips it should be fine. However for a day-long trip... I'd go find a good backpack camera bag.

Just my two cents. :]
Good thing National Geographic does carry a backpack in the same style, too! I'd probably grab that sooner or later for hiking
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old September 15th, 2010, 04:31 AM
noodlehaus's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 201
noodlehaus's Gallery
Default

I bought the same bag for my wife a few months back. She/I don't use it much though, as I found it to be too inconvenient to use for its size (we found it to be too thick/wide). It was a bit too much for us because we always go out with just one body + one lens.

We found the crumpler 4mil home bag to be sized better, though still a bit thick/wide. Now i'm just looking for a nice satchel.
__________________
flickr & blog
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com