|
LeicaPlace |
|
|
4Thanks
 |
|
|

June 24th, 2012, 12:00 PM
|
|
Mu-43 Regular
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raleigh North Carolina
Posts: 170
Jorg.S's Gallery
|
|
If you already have a kit lens which are pretty good as is, I would get the Olympus 40-150mm which can be gotten very cheap at around $100 - $150.00 and that'll give you the longer reach for wildlife and also portraits.
If you need something faster you could add the Sigma 19mm 2.8 or any legacy lens which together will cost you the same or less then the 20mm by itself.
So for about $300.00 to $350.00 you can get coverage from 14 to 150 plus a relatively fast 19mm lens.
That is if your on a tight budget if not well then get anything you like
|

June 25th, 2012, 07:58 AM
|
 |
Mu-43 Veteran
|
|
|
|
A lot of contradictory advice here. Before you can make sense of it you need to actually use different focal lengths, for example off your kit lens, paying close attention to what you can get in the frame.
Those saying the 14mm is wide: yes, but not particularly wide. After all, it's equivalent to 28mm FF FOV, which was a pretty standard walk-around lens for some shooters. To get anything wide enough for interiors in Europe, you need the 9mm zoom. But then you have to worry about light. This is one case where a larger format camera has advantages that cannot be overcome.
I find the Panasonic to be a superb general-purpose lens, but I don't really consider it too wide. It is quite limiting for interiors. It's cheap, good, and fast, however.
I almost never use my Panasonic 20mm. It's too in between for me and I never liked the 30-50mm equivalent FOV much. YMMV.
Something like the 45mm would be fantastic and would give you great DOF control compared with your kit zoom. But only if you are particular to portraits and hunting for details.
Otherwise Jorg above has very practical advice.
__________________
Listen to my new album "The Drones" free on BandCamp. Visit my Flickr images, website, or blog. Cheers!
|

June 25th, 2012, 08:00 AM
|
 |
Mu-43 Veteran
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by David A
I live in Australia, in Brisbane which is sub-tropical, and most of my shooting is done outdoors. I assure you that fast lenses are still handy.
|
Of course I was not trying to imply otherwise, else I would not have mentioned the ND filters (the only real purpose of which in this context is to permit use of faster apertures). A fast lens might always be preferable but is not always necessary. And this would tend to be the case in a sunny outdoor environment. If you only get one lens inevitably you must compromise.
Living in Ireland, I can assure you that all my lenses must be fast!
__________________
Listen to my new album "The Drones" free on BandCamp. Visit my Flickr images, website, or blog. Cheers!
|

June 27th, 2012, 05:00 AM
|
|
Mu-43 Regular
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sunny Norfolk, UK
Posts: 183
Real Name: Hexaholic Gyles's Gallery
|
|
I took my GF1 to Cuba and found the P20 and P14-45 to be great.
__________________
Panasonic GF1, Panasonic 20mm f1.7, Panasonic 14-45mm, Hexanon 200mm f3.5, Hexanon 135mm f3.2, Hexanon 50mm f1.7, Hexanon 40mm f1.8, Hexanon 28mm f3.5, Quarry Optics 28mm f2.8 Macro
|

June 27th, 2012, 09:29 PM
|
|
|
Here's what I wanna do... I'm about to order an E-PL1 but I asked the seller to switch the MKII kit lens for Panny 14-45mm kit lens. I can still change that if I want, but I've read that Panny is better... Any advice here? I can also ask the seller to equip my E-PL1 with MKII R version of Olly's kit lens.
Here's a note from Head-to-Head Reviews:
However, when pitted Head-to-Head, the Panasonic lens is the stronger performer, while Olympus’s M.Zuiko lens more effectively realizes the benefits of the compact format.
+ it does have Image Stabilization, so when combined with Olly E-PL1's body stabilization it should give me better results, right?
Last edited by mesmerized; June 27th, 2012 at 09:38 PM.
|

June 27th, 2012, 10:16 PM
|
 |
Mu-43 Top Veteran
|
|
|
|
It's one, or the other, but not both on image stabilization.
|

June 27th, 2012, 10:18 PM
|
|
|
oh... so it won't give me any advantage...
any other reason why I should take the 14-45mm instead of 14-42mm?
|

June 28th, 2012, 04:55 AM
|
|
Mu-43 Regular
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sunny Norfolk, UK
Posts: 183
Real Name: Hexaholic Gyles's Gallery
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mesmerized
oh... so it won't give me any advantage...
any other reason why I should take the 14-45mm instead of 14-42mm?
|
an extra 3mm - size IS everything
Plus look at the results in this thread A Walk Around Bishop Hill
__________________
Panasonic GF1, Panasonic 20mm f1.7, Panasonic 14-45mm, Hexanon 200mm f3.5, Hexanon 135mm f3.2, Hexanon 50mm f1.7, Hexanon 40mm f1.8, Hexanon 28mm f3.5, Quarry Optics 28mm f2.8 Macro
|

June 28th, 2012, 05:11 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gyles
|
haha, I'm not sure if that's not an irony but anyway... I can ask the seller to equip my E-PL1 with either Olly MKII lens, Olly MKII R lens or Panny 14-45 but I want to make sure that I choose the best kit lens and get vivid colors in the pics. Are these kit lenses really much different?
|

June 28th, 2012, 05:35 AM
|
 |
Mu-43 Top Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 907
Real Name: Chris Chrisnmn's Gallery
|
|
Sorry for the double post!
Last edited by Chrisnmn; June 28th, 2012 at 05:42 AM.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
More Discussions |
|
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
|
|
More Member Ads |
|
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
|
|
FTC Disclosure |
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.
|
|