Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Micro 4/3 Cameras > Panasonic Cameras

Panasonic Cameras Micro 4/3 cameras made by Panasonic

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
View Poll Results: What do you think of m43 noise
Looks awesome 6 26.09%
Looks like crap 2 8.70%
Grain is for film 0 0%
Okay but not mind-numbingly spectacular 6 26.09%
Acceptable 9 39.13%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Thank Tree3Thanks
  • 1 Post By Uwharrie
  • 1 Post By Amin Sabet
  • 1 Post By fredlong

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old August 11th, 2012, 12:42 AM
KVG's Avatar
KVG KVG is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: yyc(Calgary, AB)
Posts: 1,749


Real Name: Kelly
KVG's Gallery
Default POLL. M43 high iso noise for b&w.

I know people say m43 noise is very digital compared to ff noise, but what do you think of m43 high iso noise for b&w?

iso 3200



iso 1250

Last edited by KVG; August 11th, 2012 at 12:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 11th, 2012, 12:51 AM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 239
Real Name: Lynne Ezzell
Uwharrie's Gallery
Default

You need an acceptable option
Thanked by KVG.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 11th, 2012, 12:58 AM
KVG's Avatar
KVG KVG is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: yyc(Calgary, AB)
Posts: 1,749


Real Name: Kelly
KVG's Gallery
Default

agreed, but I don't know how to edit the poll. Mods can you help a brother out?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 11th, 2012, 08:19 AM
Amin Sabet's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA (United States)
Posts: 6,864
Real Name: Amin
Amin Sabet's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KVG View Post
agreed, but I don't know how to edit the poll. Mods can you help a brother out?
All set.

Incidentally, there still isn't an option that suits me. I think all Bayer sensor noise pretty much looks the same if you shoot RAW. The character (quality) of shot noise from a 1st gen MFT camera looks no different than the noise from a current 35mm format digital camera to me. The difference is in the ISO value at which it occurs.

The idea that certain cameras have more "grain like" noise has no basis in reality to anyone who shoots RAW. If anyone disagrees, please post crops processed from RAW without noise removal.
Thanked by Lawrence A..
__________________
Amin
Mu-43.com Webmaster (Site FAQ | Help Forum | My Disclosures | My Flickriver | My G+ Profile)

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates. We get a small referral fee when you buy after clicking our link. Your price is unaffected.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 11th, 2012, 08:24 AM
fredlong's Avatar
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 926
Real Name: Fred
fredlong's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KVG View Post
I know people say m43 noise is very digital compared to ff noise, but what do you think of m43 high iso noise for b&w?
I've never heard anyone say that.

What the residual noise looks like varies depending on how the image is converted. In camera, Panny or Oly look different. Software raw converters all produce a different look to the noise. I don't think it's possible to make a blanket statement that the the noise looks good or doesn't look good across all u4/3 cameras with all conversion options.

My own experience is with a Panasonic G2. The noise produced by the in camera jpeg conversion doesn't look so good. The noise from raw converted in Aperture looks good, kind of film-like. With my older 4/3 Olympus E600, the in camera jpeg and Aperture produced pretty similar looking noise.

Fred
Thanked by Amin Sabet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 11th, 2012, 10:25 AM
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,531
Hikari's Gallery
Default

Why do you think a subjective poll on a subjective image quality is anymore valuable than simply showing people have differing opinions? What do YOU think?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 11th, 2012, 07:50 PM
RevBob's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NorthWestern PA
Posts: 3,520
Real Name: Bob
RevBob's Gallery
Default

I prefer adding grain in Lightroom or Silver efex, it just looks better to me.
__________________
Love mercy, do justice, walk humbly - Micah 6:8
"A true photograph need not be explained, nor can it be contained in words." Ansel Adams
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 11th, 2012, 09:19 PM
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 924
Real Name: Larry
Lawrence A.'s Gallery
Default

Here's a shot, taken in very, very dim light at iso 3200 with the E-M5 and a 90mm Leitz Elmar form 1946. I don't find the B&W noise objectionable on m4/3. Chroma noise in color shots is much more objectionable to me.

__________________
Du noir s'en vient
Le clair qu'il a.

Guillevic
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com