Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Micro 4/3 Cameras > Panasonic Cameras

Panasonic Cameras Micro 4/3 cameras made by Panasonic

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree4Thanks
  • 4 Post By John M Flores

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old August 9th, 2011, 05:38 PM
John M Flores's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Somerville, NJ
Posts: 1,215


John M Flores's Gallery
Default GH2 on Safari (Luminous Landscape)

A GH2 and a Leica S2 walk into a bar...

Oh wait, this isn't a joke, one of the Luminous Landscape contributors Mark Dubovoy recently wrote about taking the GH2 on an African Safari.

On Safari

Included are samples taken with the 100-300
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 9th, 2011, 06:14 PM
Luckypenguin's Avatar
Mu-43 Retiree
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,642
Real Name: Nic
Luckypenguin's Gallery
Default

Sorry, I had to do a quick google to find out what a Leica S2 was.

Interesting article, although the author appears to have some very strong opinions on various topics. The expose-to-the-right theory is obviously still a big thing over there. I like the way he mentions trying something different by taking some slightly broader environmental shots rather than just snapping away with the longest lens possible.

Thanks for posting.
__________________
Nic
E-M5, GH1
Flickr Photostream
>> Insert quote here <<
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 9th, 2011, 06:53 PM
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,019
digitalandfilm's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckypenguin View Post
The expose-to-the-right theory is obviously still a big thing over there. Thanks for posting.
I tried to follow that as well.. the histogram (at least in Olympus Camera's) seems to give better IQ when shifted over to the center, I haven't messed with the G2 yet.

If anything, I do the complete opposite of what he says.. histogram in the center, than move the slider the other way.

I guess it's 6 of one, a half dozen of the other.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 10th, 2011, 05:20 AM
prone to distraction
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,304


nickthetasmaniac's Gallery
Default

I think the thing that people have to understand with the 'expose to the right' approach is that it only makes sense if you're going to post-process every image - it will not make for attractive out-of-camera shots...

Anyway, as with most LL articles I really enjoyed it - very experienced and talented photographers talking about using cameras.

A self-declared medium format pro deciding to take a GH2 along with his $25K Leica definitely makes me feel a bit smug when I shoot alongside my friends D700/5D's
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 11th, 2011, 04:18 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA area
Posts: 25
ajm80031's Gallery
Default

In a nutshell, Expose To The Right (ETTR) applies to shots where you don't need the full dynamic range of the sensor AND you're shooting RAW AND you're going to post-process. The specifics can be found in several articles on the Luminous Landscape site, which explains the differences between how the human eye registers light vs. a sensor. I'll provide a quick and dirty description below. If you really want to understand it, read up on it on LL.

In a nutshell, if a camera sensor can cover 10 stops of brightness, there's a LOT more information recorded by the sensor at the higher stops than at the lower ones (read the LL articles to understand why). Therefore, to capture the most detail, you should use the highest exposure you can without clipping the highlights. Images shot this way can look horrible if they're not post-processed, appearing overexposed and flat.

However, taking a shot exposed in this manner and then adjusting it "back down" in your photo processing software, will restore the proper overall brightness level. So then what's the point? The resulting image will contain a lot more fine detail in the darker portions than if you'd shot it "normally exposed" in the first place.

Michael Reichman has suggested that makers of cameras that use the sensor itself as the light meter (e.g. micro 4/3rds cameras) should have the camera automatically ETTR and then set a compensation value that will shift the image back to "normal" once the data has been read off the sensor. That would allow all users to get the benefit of this technique without having to override the camera's auto-metering and applying adjustments manually in post-processing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 13th, 2011, 02:57 AM
prone to distraction
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,304


nickthetasmaniac's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajm80031 View Post
In a nutshell, Expose To The Right (ETTR) applies to shots where you don't need the full dynamic range of the sensor AND you're shooting RAW AND you're going to post-process.
You could probably add to that '...and you're going to print BIG'
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 13th, 2011, 07:51 AM
zpierce's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 566
Real Name: Zach
zpierce's Gallery
Default

I enjoyed the article, but is it just me or were the photos posted with it fairly dull? They left me flat and seemed often poorly lit (shot in the shade, etc). It seemed like they suffered from the lack of tonality he was arguing against :) I'm certainly no expert, but my gut reaction was meh. I wouldn't have sent them on to someone as examples to say "hey look what our cameras can do on safari"
__________________
Zach Pierce
Photos
OMD, GH2, G1
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 20th, 2011, 07:12 PM
John M Flores's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Somerville, NJ
Posts: 1,215


John M Flores's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zpierce
I enjoyed the article, but is it just me or were the photos posted with it fairly dull? They left me flat and seemed often poorly lit (shot in the shade, etc). It seemed like they suffered from the lack of tonality he was arguing against :) I'm certainly no expert, but my gut reaction was meh. I wouldn't have sent them on to someone as examples to say "hey look what our cameras can do on safari"
Agreed.

don't blame me, my iPhone sent this
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 20th, 2011, 08:34 PM
New to Mu-43
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5
alemmo's Gallery
Default

hmm am I the only one who is not that impressed with those images? I have seen much better with the 100-300mm. Maybe those aren't his best shots and he is keeping the rest under wraps.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com