Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Micro 4/3 Cameras > Panasonic Cameras

Panasonic Cameras Micro 4/3 cameras made by Panasonic

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree1Thanks
  • 1 Post By Ned

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old April 5th, 2012, 12:35 AM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 50
scotttnz's Gallery
Default GF5 officially announced

Preview over at dpreview.

Interestingly "The LUMIX GF5 features a newly developed 12.1-megapixel Live MOS sensor"

Will be interesting to see how it performs!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 5th, 2012, 12:52 AM
Promit's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,438
Promit's Gallery
Default

It performs the same.

Seriously, Panasonic and Olympus could not be bigger, more blatant liars when it comes to sensor performance. I'm sure they made all kinds of changes at an engineering level, and once DXO runs the numbers we'll see a third of a stop on high ISO and maybe vaguely better AF. Yup, all new. Suuuure.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 5th, 2012, 01:00 AM
Armanius's Avatar
Snickering Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,609
Real Name: Muttley
Armanius's Gallery
Default

Priced about a $100 less than the GX1 kits, but GX1 has the 16 mp sensor. Hmmm ...
__________________
OMD
14/2.5 17/1.8 17/2.8 25/1.4 45/1.8 75/1.8 12-50 14-150
My FlickR!

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 5th, 2012, 03:00 AM
jyc860923's Avatar
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Shenyang, China
Posts: 552
Real Name: 贾一川
jyc860923's Gallery
Default

no big change from GF3 except for stereo mic and faster processor.

I'm looking forward to the "new sensor" but I can't expect too much.

still no 1080p video shooting, GF5 does exactly what GF3 does with a G3-like grip which I happen to hate
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jyc860923/
Panasonic DMC-GF3
Olympus PEN E-PL5
Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm f/1.4
Lumix G Vario 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH/MEGA O.I.S.
Lumix G Vario 45-200mm f/4-5.6 MEGA O.I.S.
Lumix G 14mm f/2.5 ASPH
M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 II
mecablitz 44 AF-1 digital
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 5th, 2012, 03:08 AM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Paranaque, Philippines
Posts: 304
Real Name: Russell Olaguer
RussellOlaguer's Gallery
Default

Nice cute little camera.
But I prefer the looks of GX1.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 5th, 2012, 04:22 AM
Ned's Avatar
Ned Ned is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,053
Ned's Gallery
Send a message via MSN to Ned Send a message via Skype™ to Ned
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Promit View Post
It performs the same.

Seriously, Panasonic and Olympus could not be bigger, more blatant liars when it comes to sensor performance. I'm sure they made all kinds of changes at an engineering level, and once DXO runs the numbers we'll see a third of a stop on high ISO and maybe vaguely better AF. Yup, all new. Suuuure.
What are they lying about when they say it's all new? They're not saying it will suddenly make all the known laws of photography obsolete. They're just saying it's all new... maybe the misinterpretation comes from the ones who think that something "new" must be earth shatteringly better? Each new sensor is generally an improvement, and that's what I expect. I don't remember being promised that the earth will move. "Blantant liars" is a strong accusation.

Now, I know I may indulge in a bit of hyperbole myself sometimes. For instance, I may rave about the great improvement in sharpness from an E-3 to an E-5 or an E-P2 to an E-PL2... When you step back and look at the big picture, the difference is really not that profound - but it's enough of a difference that with my strict standards it makes "enough" difference for me to forsake the older models in preference of the new. That doesn't mean that I believe an E-P2 is no longer capable of taking quality photographs, or that all the photos I took back in the day with my E-3 should now be trashed in the garbage because they're so inferior to today's photos. No, technology does not change that much or that fast.

The capabilities and basic laws of photography have only gradually changed over the years. You can easily tell the difference between photos taken in this day and age with photos taken 50 years ago, but you can barely tell the difference in photos taken 10 or 20 years ago. So just what drastic change do you expect to happen between last year and today?
Thanked by Iconindustries.
__________________
Olympus E-3 | Olympus E-PL2 PEN | Olympus E-PM1 PEN | Zuiko ED 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 SWD | Zuiko 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 | Vivitar 100mm f/2.8 Macro | Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/2.8 | Konica Hexanon 50mm f/1.4 | Konica Hexanon 85mm f/1.8 | G.Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 | Zuiko 35mm f/3.5 Macro | Zuiko 25mm f/2.8 | KMZ Jupiter-3 50mm f/1.5 | E.Zuiko 200mm f/4 | Zuiko 75-150mm f/4 | Olympus EC-14 teleconverter | VF-2 and VF-3 Viewfinders | EMA-1 Mic Adapter | Olympus FL-36R and FL-50R speedlights

cyclopsphoto.ca

Last edited by Ned; April 5th, 2012 at 04:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com