|
Lensbaby |
|
|
Nik Software |

Mu-43 members get
15% off Nik Apps
Coupon code: MU-43
Europe info here
|
|
Think Tank Photo |
|
|
Serious Compacts |
|
|
 |
|
|

September 9th, 2010, 08:36 PM
|
|
|
VF-2--yes or no?
is the VF2 really necessary especially at its cost? I am willing to spring if it really makes a difference,i haven't had that much trouble just using the screen, but then most of my shots so far have been indoors .
|

September 9th, 2010, 08:45 PM
|
 |
Administrator Emeritus
|
|
|
|
Welcome,
Which camera and lens setup do you have?
First things first...
Shooter
|

September 9th, 2010, 08:58 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near "Playland" outside of NYC, NY, USA
Posts: 6,357
BBW's Gallery
|
|
He's got the E-PL1 and the answer is YES. However, if you're OK without it, there's no rush. Take some time and perhaps you'll have the opportunity to see one in real life sometime and be able to decide after you've seen what the little jewel offers.
Seriously, I love mine and really would be lost without it. That said I know there are others who are fine without one. Different needs for different people. Here is are a couple of good threads for you: Viewfinder E-VF2 on E-PL1 - Essential Option and Is the Electronic Viewfinder worth it? this second one also gives a hyperlink to a third one. Take a read through and see what you think, Bennett.
|

September 10th, 2010, 01:49 AM
|
|
|
well...
If you plan to use MF lenses then I would say that it is an absolute necessity. If you are using AF lenses then I would say not so much. I just got one and it hasn't come off of my camera since I got it (despite being pretty dorky looking).
Kevin
__________________
E-PM1 - E-P1 and some lenses
|

September 10th, 2010, 04:18 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
|
I lived without the VF-2 for too long (because of it being unavailable). Now that I have one, even for legacy manual focus lenses (which are all I use anyway) I prefer the LCD to the EVF for all tripod-mounted shots.
For handheld -- however -- I would think you'll find the VF-2 a necessity.
|

September 10th, 2010, 07:16 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
|
I've never used my Pen 2 without it. It's invaluable for me as a spectacle wearer.
|

September 10th, 2010, 05:55 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
|
Mine just arrived this afternoon...
and the visual quality is excellent. I'm really glad I bought it. Great for shooting macros outdoors, and for outdoor shooting in general.
One of the biggest beefs I've had with my digicams without viewfinders is the great difficulty of seeing what I want to shoot on the lcds.
The PEN e-PL1 isn't as bad for viewing as some others I've had, but the VF-2 is going to make shooting outside a lot more pleasant.
Isabel
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAKatz
is the VF2 really necessary especially at its cost? I am willing to spring if it really makes a difference,i haven't had that much trouble just using the screen, but then most of my shots so far have been indoors .
|
|

September 10th, 2010, 06:49 PM
|
|
|
I wouldn't have bought my EP-2 without it. I find it essential for stability when using FT lenses and also with the Pany 7-14. Maybe it's just my age!
However, I'd really like the EP-9 large eye-cup for the VF-2, but it doesn't seem to be available in the UK yet!
Andrew
|

September 10th, 2010, 06:53 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
|
Andrew, are you saying that the EP-9 eyecup would fit the VF-2?
Is there any other rubber eyecup that would fit the VF-2?
Isabel
|

September 10th, 2010, 07:15 PM
|
|
|
re:my post
thanks everybody...i guess its more important to learn the camera first, and worry about the viewfinder later. (x-mas)?
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
Lensbaby Tilt Transformer |
|
|
|
|
FTC Disclosure |
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.
|
|