I just realized the Chevy has ghost flames. Very cool car!

So near the Manzanos....I do miss living in NM sometimes and the east mountains are nice.

damn you kill the ZL1

__________________
QmüngousPhoto.com

Very nice, I like it .

__________________
Amin
Mu-43.com Webmaster (Site FAQ | Help Forum | My Disclosures | My Flickriver | My G+ Profile)

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates. We get a small referral fee when you buy after clicking our link. Your price is unaffected.

Hmmm, I'm not having an issue finding that 3-D rendering. These were taken with the E-620, which is essentially the same sensor found in the Pens, but with a stronger AA filter.






How about the E-410 (10 MP)?





I guess a solution would be to just shoot a panorama.

I did this little guy over three years ago, with an Olympus E-410 (10 MP) and the firecracker of the Zuiko Digital 35mm f/3.5 Macro (@ f/11). 7 shots, with the overlap makes about a 24 MP shot.

__________________
E-M5 -- E-PL1 -- PL-25 -- m.12-50 -- m.17 -- m.45 f/1.8 -- m.14-42 (non-MSC) -- m.40-150

I don't see it. One thing is that stopping f/11 on a Micro 4/3 camera is going to introduce some softening due to diffraction, which will in turn limit the "pop" of the image. Other than that, I don't know what you could be referring to. Samples of what you're seeing would help.

__________________
Amin
Mu-43.com Webmaster (Site FAQ | Help Forum | My Disclosures | My Flickriver | My G+ Profile)

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates. We get a small referral fee when you buy after clicking our link. Your price is unaffected.

There's nothing I can add until fransglans can post some examples. The Canon 50D is a nice camera but there's nothing magical about it.

__________________
Nic
E-M5, GH1
Flickr Photostream
>> Insert quote here <<

I remember being very nervous, as if this didn't come off good, I would have to live with it...

Chantilly getting prepped:










and me looking at Chantilly, all sad, as my girl didn't have her makeup on:





Then, it all started to happen.....






btw, sorry for the thread jack..........

I haven't red all replies but I try to explain my point of view.
I think you mean for flatten image the lack of tridimensionality in a picture. Tridimensionality is different from depth of field, is not a physical and measurable element.
Even we could have a tridimensionality image all in focus.
I think tridimensionality is prerogative of some lenses, sensor size has nothing to do with it!
Try zd12 f2 or panaleica 25 and you will find more tridimensional images!

__________________
E-M5, E-P2 /12f2, sigma 19f2.8, zd 14-54II , 45f1.8 35f3.5 macro, 45-175 X, 100-300, sammy 7.5 fisheye
fl-36R, YN560II

I like my m4/3 just fine, thank you. You won't get as much of a 3D effect as you would with a D700 at f/1.8 on a 50mm lens, but my photos don't look flat to me. I guess part of it is one's decisions on post processing.

All from my E-M5 :-)















OKAY....maybe this last one looks a little flat, but then....most everything is the same distance from the camera :-)



Finally, here's a Nikon D700 shot at 5mm f/1.8 for comparison. It is what it is.

__________________
Photo Blog: http://openbloom.blogspot.com/
Web Site: http://www.openbloom.com/galleries