November 2nd, 2012, 06:27 PM
|
|
|
to me a 15 typo is not a big deal ?
I can read tech specs would rather get a feel for how the camera works and acts in a photographers hands then a bunch of tech specs and pics of cats and shadow boxes etc..
like the paragraph of describing the shutter button feel compared to other cameras at least gives some a idea if they have used those cameras
sometimes working pros are not always the best at tech things but can surely tell me a lot more about how a camera works and feel in the real world
if a pro race car driver did not know the HP of a test car I would still rather hear his thoughts of how it handles etc.. than reading correct specs from someone who does not make living with the tools being tested ?
to me sadly to many reviews are not like his and are just the same regurgitated specs :)
not knocking the fact you now question his review :) just saying others like myself would rather read those kinda of reviews :)
so sure its kinda a balance thing and lucky we both have sites we can go to for reviews
|
1Thanks
