
April 20th, 2010, 03:51 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackSP
I know that but RAW is not always convenient. Thats why I said 'for JPEG shooters'. Since I like shooting lots of pics I don't want to work on each and every one of them.
|
Not to be argumentative, but I shoot everything in RAW and I work on very very few of them. When I first got the trial version of the processing software (Aperture 3 in this case), I shot a bunch of RAW+JPEGs. The program already had an E-P2 preset (I have an E-PL1, but the jpegs are very similar) and I found that by backing off the exposure by the smallest increment on the RAW preset, I couldn't tell any difference between the jpegs and the raw files after they were processed automatically on import. So I work as I would with raw+jpeg, but without all of those extra files hanging around that I'd have to manage. 90+ percent of my shots are automatically processed on import and I never touch 'em again - I basically have my jpegs without ever touching them. The handful of good ones that I'd LIKE to work on, I work on and have the benefit of all of the raw data to work with. Or sometimes if I have a series of shots taken of the same basic subject matter in the same place with the same lighting, I may work on one of them, get it right, and then apply those changes to all of the others in the series. It takes two extra mouse clicks.
I'm new to this and assumed that working with RAW would be a hassle, but I've found that its anything but a hassle.
-Ray
Last edited by Ray Sachs; April 20th, 2010 at 03:53 PM.
|