Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Micro 4/3 Cameras > Olympus Cameras

Olympus Cameras Micro 4/3 cameras made by Olympus

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree4Thanks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old April 20th, 2010, 03:25 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 54
blackSP's Gallery
Default The EP2 perfect setup. Is There Such a Thing?

I'm wondering if there's a magical sweet spot for JPEG shooters, where all tweaks over and above the factory default gives you the perfect setup.

What is it, if it exists? Less saturation, less noise reduction, gradation on normal?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 20th, 2010, 03:33 PM
Streetshooter's Avatar
Administrator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Phila, Pa USA
Posts: 5,129
Streetshooter's Gallery
Send a message via Skype™ to Streetshooter
Default

shhhhhhh, don't tell anyone about this....
there is a magical sweet spot.......

it's called RAW.......
seriously, try RAW files, the Pen cameras make great files....you can make jpgs from them that you won't get out of camera.....
shooter
__________________
~ Shooter's Flickr photostream

Blog http://streetshooter.net
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 20th, 2010, 03:42 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 54
blackSP's Gallery
Default

I know that but RAW is not always convenient. Thats why I said 'for JPEG shooters'. Since I like shooting lots of pics I don't want to work on each and every one of them.

Personally I always have sat -1, noise reduction on low, basically applying the 'Less is more' principle.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 20th, 2010, 03:44 PM
Brian Mosley's Avatar
Administrator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,018


Brian Mosley's Gallery
Default

Well, you could shoot raw + jpeg, and develop further jpegs 'in-camera' by adjusting your current settings (including selecting an Art Filter) and using the 'edit' function.

Another tip, use natural colour, contrast +1, saturation +1 to simulate the E-1 look.

Sharpening can be a bit aggressive... so set this to 0 maximum (I tend to shoot with sharpening -2 and sharpen if necessary after scaling for web)

Cheers

Brian
__________________
Founder, Olympus Photo Safari Group
http://www.ukphotosafari.org
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 20th, 2010, 03:51 PM
Ray Sachs's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Near Philadephila
Posts: 2,439
Ray Sachs's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackSP View Post
I know that but RAW is not always convenient. Thats why I said 'for JPEG shooters'. Since I like shooting lots of pics I don't want to work on each and every one of them.
Not to be argumentative, but I shoot everything in RAW and I work on very very few of them. When I first got the trial version of the processing software (Aperture 3 in this case), I shot a bunch of RAW+JPEGs. The program already had an E-P2 preset (I have an E-PL1, but the jpegs are very similar) and I found that by backing off the exposure by the smallest increment on the RAW preset, I couldn't tell any difference between the jpegs and the raw files after they were processed automatically on import. So I work as I would with raw+jpeg, but without all of those extra files hanging around that I'd have to manage. 90+ percent of my shots are automatically processed on import and I never touch 'em again - I basically have my jpegs without ever touching them. The handful of good ones that I'd LIKE to work on, I work on and have the benefit of all of the raw data to work with. Or sometimes if I have a series of shots taken of the same basic subject matter in the same place with the same lighting, I may work on one of them, get it right, and then apply those changes to all of the others in the series. It takes two extra mouse clicks.

I'm new to this and assumed that working with RAW would be a hassle, but I've found that its anything but a hassle.

-Ray
Thanked by BBW.

Last edited by Ray Sachs; April 20th, 2010 at 03:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 20th, 2010, 04:31 PM
Streetshooter's Avatar
Administrator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Phila, Pa USA
Posts: 5,129
Streetshooter's Gallery
Send a message via Skype™ to Streetshooter
Default

Ray,
Thank ya sir!
__________________
~ Shooter's Flickr photostream

Blog http://streetshooter.net
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old April 20th, 2010, 07:23 PM
Rich M's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 303
Rich M's Gallery
Default

I'm withya Ray....my workflow is to open LR....stick in my SD card and let her rip..

If there is a tweak that I need to make you have the power of the RAW file to work with.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old April 21st, 2010, 12:20 AM
Brian Mosley's Avatar
Administrator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,018


Brian Mosley's Gallery
Default

I've been shooting raw for years, but you have to be ready to deal with that extra level of software to convert from raw to jpeg... for the OP, learn how to use the in-camera edit function (i.e. try some test shots in raw and convert to jpeg in camera) and play with the jpeg shooting parameters to get the look you want.

Cheers

Brian
__________________
Founder, Olympus Photo Safari Group
http://www.ukphotosafari.org
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old April 21st, 2010, 12:33 AM
Rich M's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 303
Rich M's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Mosley View Post
I've been shooting raw for years, but you have to be ready to deal with that extra level of software to convert from raw to jpeg... for the OP, learn how to use the in-camera edit function (i.e. try some test shots in raw and convert to jpeg in camera) and play with the jpeg shooting parameters to get the look you want.

Cheers

Brian
Sound advice Brian......I wish that darn LCD on the E-P2 had better resolution.

How is the LCD on the E-PL1......any better?

R
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old April 21st, 2010, 01:39 AM
OzRay's Avatar
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mirboo North, Australia
Posts: 795
OzRay's Gallery
Default

I agree, just shot RAW. I shoot nothing but RAW for all of my sports photography and it doesn't slow my workflow one bit. I just upload everything into Lightroom and 1000s of photos from a day of sport can be selected and processed in a matter of hours or less.

The thing about shooting RAW is that RAW developers just keep improving all the time and you can go back to shots taken years ago and suddenly find that you have so much more available in a shot that you thought was good at the time. I've done this and keep being surprised. JPGs are merely a finished product baked to some engineers recipe.

Cheers

Ray
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com