Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Native Lenses

Native Lenses Lenses designed specifically for Micro Four Thirds

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old October 19th, 2010, 05:31 AM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 139
Rider's Gallery
Default What is your favorite lens for E-PL1?

So far I've only tried the 14-42 kit lens, which is fine except for the obvious issues (rotating front element, jerky AF during video, slow aperture).

I was wondering what m-43 lenses out there shine.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 19th, 2010, 06:46 AM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herten, NL
Posts: 45
andy_jansen's Gallery
Default

I really enjoying shooting pictures with my Panasonic 20mm Pancake.

No experience with shooting video (should you a camcorder for that IMHO).
I also own the oly 14-42 kit lens, but I'm not really happy with pictures in low light.

Big advantage of the panasonic 20mm pancake is that the camera becomes pretty compact.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 19th, 2010, 07:02 AM
Kosta's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 435
Kosta's Gallery
Default

i think i've really enjoyed using the 9-18 wide lens a lot, but have also loved using the manual konica hexanon 40mm! even though it's an 80mm focal length in 35mm terms, it is nice and sharp and gets some nice colours.

i've tried using an old nikon lens but it was very sharp and seemed to have a lot of CA wide open...plus it operates the opposite way to the other manual lenses i've used (focus is other direction)
__________________
Kosta

Flickr Gallery

IMA-IMMER
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 19th, 2010, 07:09 AM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 139
Rider's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosta View Post
i've tried using an old nikon lens but it was very sharp and seemed to have a lot of CA wide open...plus it operates the opposite way to the other manual lenses i've used (focus is other direction)
Which Nikon lens was that?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 19th, 2010, 09:03 AM
bilzmale's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,695
bilzmale's Gallery
Default

From my sig you will see I have all Panny lenses - they hold the top end of the market in imho. I would not like to pick between them as I like variety so ask yourself which photographic need is not being met by the kit lens and buy accordingly. The good news is there are no bad lenses.
__________________
Bill Shinnick
GH2; X100; RX100; G5(IR).


Flickr.

Last edited by bilzmale; October 19th, 2010 at 09:05 AM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old October 28th, 2010, 06:24 AM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 139
Rider's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bilzmale View Post
From my sig you will see I have all Panny lenses - they hold the top end of the market in imho. I would not like to pick between them as I like variety so ask yourself which photographic need is not being met by the kit lens and buy accordingly. The good news is there are no bad lenses.
I tried the Panny 14-140 in a shop. Mounted on GH1, it focuses amazingly fast. How does it do on the E-PL1?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old October 28th, 2010, 07:22 AM
bilzmale's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,695
bilzmale's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rider View Post
I tried the Panny 14-140 in a shop. Mounted on GH1, it focuses amazingly fast. How does it do on the E-PL1?
OK it's after 8PM here so test was in my office. The E-PL1 was slower to focus than the GH1. In good light I would expect them to be much closer. The Oly 14-150 may be worth trying.
__________________
Bill Shinnick
GH2; X100; RX100; G5(IR).


Flickr.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old October 28th, 2010, 07:26 AM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 139
Rider's Gallery
Default

Thank you. I'm really looking for a companion to my Oly 14-42. I love the fact that it collapses, but need faster less abrupt focusing. Faster aperture would be great too.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old October 28th, 2010, 09:09 AM
Mu-43 Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 11
PowderDave's Gallery
Default

I love the panasonic 20mm for general, but use the Olympus 17mm where i need extra width indoors or landscapes. I find the speed and brightness makes it more useable.
__________________
Olympus EP-1, 17 f2.8, OM50 f1.4, Panasonic 20 f1.7, 45-200, G1, 100-300,
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old October 28th, 2010, 12:46 PM
dixeyk's Avatar
Super Mod Emeritus
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 3,095
dixeyk's Gallery
Default

The 17/2.8...its fast enough, sharp and tiny...and did I mention pretty cheap as well?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com