Micro Four Thirds User Forum Lensbaby Tilt Transformer

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Native Lenses

Lensbaby
Amazon
B&H Photo
Nik Software


Mu-43 members get
15% off Nik Apps
Coupon code: MU-43
Europe info here
Think Tank Photo
Introducing the New Retrospective®5 Camera Bag
Serious Compacts
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old September 4th, 2010, 08:28 AM
Djarum's Avatar
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 1,870
Djarum's Gallery
Default Reality check on aperture, DOF, and Telephoto lenses

So, over on the other forum there is complaint that the new 40-150 should be faster, say starting at f2.8 or something like that. Looking at the specs, the lens seems really small for what it is. At any rate, the complaint was associated with DOF and the slow aperture. For a telephoto lens, I would agree that we could all use more light, but shallower DOF?

Some numbers with subject 10 feet away:

150mm @ f5.6 gives me .22 feet of acceptable focus on
25mm at @ f2.0 gives me 2.9 feet on

150mm @ f2.8 gives me 1.32 inches on .

APSC
200mm at f5.6 is .15 feet
FF at
300mm at f5.6 is less than an inch.

At less than an inch with a subject, like a bird, 10ft away, would be difficult to shoot, IMHO. Do we really need shallower DOF when using a telephoto lens?

Last edited by Streetshooter; September 4th, 2010 at 02:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 4th, 2010, 12:31 PM
grebeman's Avatar
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Near Kingsbridge in south Devon (UK)
Posts: 1,109
grebeman's Gallery
Default

This puts some of the arguments in perspective, perhaps it's time to show some sense of realism with people's expectations.

Barrie
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 4th, 2010, 12:40 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 551
photoSmart42's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Djarum View Post
At less than an inch with a subject, like a bird, 10ft away, would be difficult to shoot, IMHO. Do we really need shallower DOF when using a telephoto lens?
Who's going to shoot a bird at 10 ft away with a long tele anyway? The larger apertures are very useful when shooting objects far away which is what most tele lenses are used for anyway, in which case your DOF is pretty much irrelevant because it's very deep. So a larger aperture in that situation helps with low-light/fast action situations where you want a higher shutter speed without having to crank up the ISO too much into the noise.

Having faster tele lenses is a valid point.
__________________
-Dragos
Panasonic GH1 + various lenses
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 4th, 2010, 06:14 PM
Djarum's Avatar
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 1,870
Djarum's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photoSmart42 View Post
Who's going to shoot a bird at 10 ft away with a long tele anyway? The larger apertures are very useful when shooting objects far away which is what most tele lenses are used for anyway, in which case your DOF is pretty much irrelevant because it's very deep. So a larger aperture in that situation helps with low-light/fast action situations where you want a higher shutter speed without having to crank up the ISO too much into the noise.

Having faster tele lenses is a valid point.
Not saying it isn't, but I wouldn't consider the DOF decrease in the case of m4/3 an issue.

And I shoot birds at 10 - 15 ft away all the time with my 40-150. Someone in the apartment complex put up bird feeders last year.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 4th, 2010, 06:57 PM
JoepLX3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Japan
Posts: 510
Blog Entries: 4
JoepLX3's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Djarum View Post
Someone in the apartment complex put up bird feeders last year.
With a new mouse every hour?

My application of fast tele lenses would still be people, but a little further away than in case of a 20 mm F1.7...
__________________
Joep

PS: Try to catch a laugh every day
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 4th, 2010, 08:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 551
photoSmart42's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Djarum View Post
Not saying it isn't, but I wouldn't consider the DOF decrease in the case of m4/3 an issue.
Was the complaint regarding the lack of fast tele lenses about DOF, or about available light? I don't see DOF as a big issue for MFT cameras either.
__________________
-Dragos
Panasonic GH1 + various lenses
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DOF Preview daanh Olympus Cameras 6 August 8th, 2010 02:07 AM
Nikon G AF lenses, (and other non aperture ring lenses) BillN Adapted Lenses 4 June 22nd, 2010 04:15 PM
Woohoo! Check out the deal that I got! CalebPhotographer Adapted Lenses 3 May 31st, 2010 02:55 PM
Four third lenses aperture blades on E-P2 hellowin Olympus Cameras 3 May 4th, 2010 09:37 AM
gf1 aperture priority mode with adapted lenses floppymoose Adapted Lenses 3 February 22nd, 2010 11:53 PM

Lensbaby Tilt Transformer
Lensbaby Tilt Transformer
B&H Photo
Recent Discussions
[FS] Toys!!!!
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Template-Modifications by TMS