Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Native Lenses

Native Lenses Lenses designed specifically for Micro Four Thirds

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree46Thanks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #21  
Old August 8th, 2012, 06:02 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norcal
Posts: 78
Real Name: Gabe
Reactions's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by newbert View Post
I rented it from LensRentals. Cost will depend on how long you want it and whether you want to include their breakage insurance.
Pricey!

$50 for 4 days plus $25 shipping

I may just order it on amazon with their 30 day return
__________________
Gx-1 evf2 - panny 20mm - oly 45 mm - domke fxb - manfrotto 493
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old August 8th, 2012, 08:17 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Glens Falls, NY
Posts: 219
newbert's Gallery
Default A Few of My First Shots with the 7-14

Here are a few of my first shots with the 7-14. I took a drive up to the new Champlain Bridge that connects Crown Point, NY with Chimney Point, VT. It crosses over a narrow part of Lake Champlain and was re-built in 2009-2011 since the old bridge was deemed unsafe. I thought that a large bridge would be a good subject for a UWA lens.

View from underneath the bridge from the Vermont side.


Walking across the bridge.


View from the New York side.


I also took this shot of the covered bridge in Warren, Vermont


I have about 2 more days with the lens before I have to ship it back, so I'll go out and use it some more. Still not sure about whether I'll actually order one....
Thanked by rstrader.
__________________
-------------------------
Bert
adirondack fotoscapes
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old August 8th, 2012, 08:28 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Just above Antarctica - Hobart, Tasmania
Posts: 79
Real Name: Michael
Firedogg's Gallery
Default

Hi Bert,

I can't see anything "wrong" with your photos, but I guess that's what I like about the UWA.
In fact, I quite like the 3 photos of the concrete bridge, especially the first one, looking up underneath it.

I suppose just keep shooting anything you can with the lens while you've got (seeing as how you've already paid for the rental) and see what comes out at the end. You may be pleasantly surprised with some of the shots.

But, at the end of the day, if you still aren't comfortable with the extra width, you haven't really lost anything, and have certainly learnt a lot more than before the rental.
I hope this helps you in some way.

Good Luck
Thanked by jloden.
__________________
Michael

Gear: E-420, 25, 18-180, E-P1, m14-42, OM-D, m12-50, O60 Macro, PL25 1.4, PL7-14, HLD-6, SEMA-1, MAL-1, AC-3, plus lots of other cool toys

My neck strap massages my neck!

Last edited by Firedogg; August 8th, 2012 at 08:28 PM. Reason: Typo
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old August 8th, 2012, 09:04 PM
jloden's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hunterdon County, NJ
Posts: 1,965
Real Name: Jay
jloden's Gallery
Default

I agree with just leave it on the camera and use it. If you go around looking for good times to use an UWA lens, you're unlikely to see them because you won't "think in wide angle" naturally, if you're like most people. If you still don't find it works for you then no biggie, it's kind of a specialty lens and many people never go that wide with their shots, much like many people don't need a 300mm telephoto.

Second suggestion - go through the example image thread for the 7-14mm and 9-18mm if you haven't already, and see what other people have done with the UWA FOV. I've not even had mine that long and I've got a pretty decent variety of shots with mine, thanks to just slapping it on the camera and walking around with it. Here's a couple I grabbed from Flickr, not necessarily earth-shattering compositions but they illustrate the variety of subjects.

Extra Large


P1110418.jpg


Paneless (Color)


Out of Frame


Foot Long
Thanked by veereshai, MrDoug, rstrader and 2 others.
__________________
500px | flickr

“The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.” -- Dorothea Lange
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old August 8th, 2012, 09:05 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Glens Falls, NY
Posts: 219
newbert's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firedogg View Post
Hi Bert,

I can't see anything "wrong" with your photos, but I guess that's what I like about the UWA.
In fact, I quite like the 3 photos of the concrete bridge, especially the first one, looking up underneath it.

I suppose just keep shooting anything you can with the lens while you've got (seeing as how you've already paid for the rental) and see what comes out at the end. You may be pleasantly surprised with some of the shots.

But, at the end of the day, if you still aren't comfortable with the extra width, you haven't really lost anything, and have certainly learnt a lot more than before the rental.
I hope this helps you in some way.

Good Luck
Thanks, Michael. While I'm happy with these, I guess that I'm finding it a challenge to identify suitable subjects for this lens. For example in #3 - I tried to include a foreground subject close to the lens (the flowers), but that resulted in the real subject (the bridge) appearing small and far away. It's a different perspective for sure, but not one I'm sure I'm willing to pay $900 for.

The covered bridge looks distorted, not because of the lens so much - The openings at both ends of the bridge are actually at an odd angle, which this lens accentuates, making it look odder still.

The 7-14 definitely presents a challenge in composition. Maybe it's just the price that's holding me back... I see it as a specialty lens and I'm not sure whether I'm willing to spend the $$$ for a lens that I'd probably only use now and then. (I keep going back and forth on this....Tomorrow, I may be singing a different tune....That's why I decided to rent before buying. )

Thanks for your thoughts!

I'll keep at it over the next couple of days. Maybe a light will go off to help me decide one way or another.
__________________
-------------------------
Bert
adirondack fotoscapes
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old August 8th, 2012, 09:09 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Glens Falls, NY
Posts: 219
newbert's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jloden View Post
I agree with just leave it on the camera and use it. If you go around looking for good times to use an UWA lens, you're unlikely to see them because you won't "think in wide angle" naturally, if you're like most people. If you still don't find it works for you then no biggie, it's kind of a specialty lens and many people never go that wide with their shots, much like many people don't need a 300mm telephoto.

Second suggestion - go through the example image thread for the 7-14mm and 9-18mm if you haven't already, and see what other people have done with the UWA FOV. I've not even had mine that long and I've got a pretty decent variety of shots with mine, thanks to just slapping it on the camera and walking around with it. Here's a couple I grabbed from Flickr, not necessarily earth-shattering compositions but they illustrate the variety of subjects.
Great shots! Thanks for the inspiration!!!
Thanked by jloden.
__________________
-------------------------
Bert
adirondack fotoscapes
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old August 8th, 2012, 09:17 PM
jloden's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hunterdon County, NJ
Posts: 1,965
Real Name: Jay
jloden's Gallery
Default

There's a few other threads I'd recommend checking out, besides the sample image archive. Landshark posted a great images thread from the Guggenheim Bilboa with the 7-14mm that makes great use of the UWA. Also Don (DHart) has some great images with the 9-18 and 7-14 - I blame him all the time for selling me on a 7-14mm, haha. Check out his Singing the Praises thread for the 9-18 and Another Singing the Praises thread for the 7-14mm.
__________________
500px | flickr

“The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.” -- Dorothea Lange
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old August 9th, 2012, 06:54 AM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Glens Falls, NY
Posts: 219
newbert's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jloden View Post
There's a few other threads I'd recommend checking out, besides the sample image archive. Landshark posted a great images thread from the Guggenheim Bilboa with the 7-14mm that makes great use of the UWA. Also Don (DHart) has some great images with the 9-18 and 7-14 - I blame him all the time for selling me on a 7-14mm, haha. Check out his Singing the Praises thread for the 9-18 and Another Singing the Praises thread for the 7-14mm.
OMG! Thanks so much for those links! I'm hoping to make a similar trip as Don (but only for 2 months or so) next year (I'm also retired), and his images are truly inspiring. They really show what these lenses can do in a variety of situations.

Thanks again!
Thanked by jloden.
__________________
-------------------------
Bert
adirondack fotoscapes
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old August 9th, 2012, 08:14 AM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 480
Just Jim's Gallery
Default

I use a spirit level mounted to hot shoe, and a tripod with this lens when I'm looking to reduce distortion.

eg
20120706-_1200351-Edit.jpg

Using a spirit level here on a mini tripod, I didn't have to go into cs6 to use the PC crop tool. PC crop is another great tool, that's almost needed when you use this lens when you want to maintain your lines. I could go into cs6 and give it a slight correction on the right side, and lose very little of the image to the crop, because of the level. However, if I hand held this and just guessed at the level, I'd lose quite a bit of the field of view to the PC crop.

And for a slight rant... why don't we have tilt and swing on the sensors yet? Seems like something that would be so easy to design, it's not like there's roll film in the back that will twist... just sayin.
Thanked by htc, fin azvandi, veereshai and 3 others.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old August 9th, 2012, 08:51 AM
jloden's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hunterdon County, NJ
Posts: 1,965
Real Name: Jay
jloden's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Jim View Post
And for a slight rant... why don't we have tilt and swing on the sensors yet? Seems like something that would be so easy to design, it's not like there's roll film in the back that will twist... just sayin.
The GX1 has a tilt and level indicator option on the display that I really appreciate. Basically just two sets of lines that turns green when you've got the camera pointed level. I miss that a lot when I go back and forth to the G3!

The X100 also has a level indicator too, which was the first camera I'd used with one. It was a nice surprise to find that feature on the GX1 for sure. Hopefully it becomes a standard feature going forward.
__________________
500px | flickr

“The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.” -- Dorothea Lange
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com