Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Native Lenses

Native Lenses Lenses designed specifically for Micro Four Thirds

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree22Thanks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old March 17th, 2011, 09:50 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 33
alipapa70's Gallery
Default Pana/Leica 45mm - It can do portrait!!!

Just a portrait of me.

The Pana/Leica DG 45mm Macro is capable to do some portrait work, if you don't need the dOf so much.
Attached Images
 
Thanked by walt_tbay and jalex.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 17th, 2011, 09:50 PM
Mu-43 Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 16
MicroShutter's Gallery
Default

DOF is a good thing!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 17th, 2011, 10:02 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 33
alipapa70's Gallery
Default I'm always a fan of shallow dof.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroShutter View Post
DOF is a good thing!
I know. But there have been so many negative comments about the Pana/Leica not being able to do portrait work. I just think it is very well able to do so with its restrictions regarding the aperture. It is very sharp though if you're out there for head shots only! Maybe a tack too sharp!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 17th, 2011, 10:19 PM
Rich M's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 303
Rich M's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alipapa70 View Post
I know. But there have been so many negative comments about the Pana/Leica not being able to do portrait work.
The people that say that either have never used one or don't know how to use one.

R
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old March 20th, 2011, 01:02 PM
zuzullo's Avatar
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Europe - Norway - Tromsø
Posts: 137
zuzullo's Gallery
Send a message via Skype™ to zuzullo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alipapa70 View Post
Just a portrait of me.

The Pana/Leica DG 45mm Macro is capable to do some portrait work, if you don't need the dOf so much.
An apprentice here:
Why not buying the Zuiko 50mm f2,0 instead?
Its brighter, cheaper and has a bigger DOF, right?

thanks in advance
Z
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old March 20th, 2011, 01:27 PM
Rich M's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 303
Rich M's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zuzullo View Post
An apprentice here:
Why not buying the Zuiko 50mm f2,0 instead?
Its brighter, cheaper and has a bigger DOF, right?

thanks in advance
Z
Much much bigger.....AF is quite slow (compared to PL45).......hunts on macro is you want to use AF (racks in and out).

Don't get me wrong.....I had one .......sold it.......and just bought another. However, for a light, well balanced, relatively fast focusing 90mm equivalent lens, you can't beat the PL45 for quality and versatility.

(And it's quite beautiful too....)

R
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old April 11th, 2011, 06:54 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington State, USA
Posts: 252
Tom Swaman's Gallery
Default

Just a comment which I hope will be taken in a positive vein. A portrait photographer needs a widely variable light source if DOF is to be effectively controlled with any one lens. If you are shooting candid portraite/available light portraits, you can change lenses when you need more aperture or increase your ISO. In a portrait studio with good lighting, you normally do not need to change ISO because good lighting is easily varied by four or more f-stops. The bottom line is that the PL 45mm DG is a good lens for portraiture if your available light falls within an optimum intensity range for this lens to work the way you want it to work. Because post-1870 designed lenses typically eliminate barrel distortion, it is no longer necessary to take portraits with lenses falling in the focal length range of 84mm to 150mm. Frankly, I often used the newer Nikon 24-70mm zoom lens for portraiture and achieved suberb results. Finally, some folks care and do not want a photographer in their face when their portrait is being taken. With these folks, a 40mm to 60 mm lens(35mm equivalent) is bound to rattle the subject whereas an 85mm or longer lens may not. Then again, one has to have sufficient room to use a longer focal length and space can be a problem these days. It all comes down to personal preference, in my opinion.

Regards,
Tom
Thanked by Armanius.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old April 11th, 2011, 07:15 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 71
fastcar888's Gallery
Default

I just took, among the best portraits ever with this 45mm Panny/Leica 2.8 lens yesterday in light that was not optimal. In fact, I was blown away with the results. I hope you take this in a positive light, but this is an exceptional portrait lens (in my judgement). The eighty five Nikons or Canons, 90mm Leica and 105 Nikon's are classics portraits lenses. In the past I have owned Leica 50mm, 75mm and 90mm and sold them when digital came in. Before then had various Nikons, including the stellar 105mm.

Currently, I have newer 24-70 Nikon. I was considering putting it on Ebay after looking at my shots yesterday, but I decided to keep it around. (I don't know why). Micro Four Thirds camera are not really for Full Frame studio work. But I don't believe an APS-C camera is either.

So, I just don't agree with you assessment unless you are a pro in a studio. That is about it. They way I see it is that I just bought a ticket on the train of photographic modernization.
Thanked by Armanius.
__________________
Olympus E PL2 /VF 2 Viewfinder
45mm Panasonic/Leica 2.8
20mm 1.7 Panasonic
Olympus 14mm-42mm
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old April 11th, 2011, 07:38 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington State, USA
Posts: 252
Tom Swaman's Gallery
Default

Fastcar,

Please reread what I wrote. I believe that most of what I wrote states the same as you wrote with respect to portraiture and to lenses. I did have a full portraiture studio with very large relative light sources which I just sold. I also had a near perfect copy of the Nikon 24-70 mm. I only used the latter lens in the studio and I did achieve excellent results. I do own the PL 45 DG lens and it is superb. So, overall we agree and do not disagree. Perhaps I did not write clearly.

Regards,
Tom
Thanked by Armanius and fastcar888.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old April 11th, 2011, 07:52 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 71
fastcar888's Gallery
Smile

Got it. We are on the same page. I am so extraordinarily enthusiastic about MTF equipment because of the small size and quality. Take care...
Thanked by Armanius.
__________________
Olympus E PL2 /VF 2 Viewfinder
45mm Panasonic/Leica 2.8
20mm 1.7 Panasonic
Olympus 14mm-42mm
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com