Micro Four Thirds User Forum

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Native Lenses
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Serious Compacts
» Notice
Registered members enjoy an uncluttered thread view without left column ads and in-text link ads. Register now!
Reply
 
LinkBack (12) Thread Tools
  #31  
Old July 26th, 2010, 06:09 AM
Amin Sabet's Avatar
Founder
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA (United States)
Posts: 2,409
Amin Sabet's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Mosley View Post
No distortion correction applied to either raw file, CA correction applied to the mZD 9-18, clicked on Auto levels on both, adjusted sharpening to bring more detail out of the mZD 9-18.

My point is that if you're interested enough in pixel level detail, using the right tools - the difference between the two lenses can be much less than it seems over there.
Distortion correction has been automatically applied to both RAW files, and like Lightroom, C1 doesn't give you the option of disabling that distortion correction, which I think is a shame.

If you are going to selectively give the Olympus image more sharpening, might as well not even show the Panasonic crops. It invalidates the comparison. Using selective processing, one can make just about any two decent lenses look like similar performers.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old July 26th, 2010, 06:19 AM
Brian Mosley's Avatar
Administrator


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,957
Blog Entries: 131
Brian Mosley's Gallery
Default

Amin, Capture One 5 PRO has a Distortion Correction slider with enable/disable option... I had this option disabled for both raw files.

Why would you do a pixel level comparison without CA correction, when it's easily available?

Cheers

Brian
__________________
Founder, Olympus Photo Safari Group
http://www.ukphotosafari.org
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old July 26th, 2010, 07:57 AM
Amin Sabet's Avatar
Founder
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA (United States)
Posts: 2,409
Amin Sabet's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Mosley View Post
Amin, Capture One 5 PRO has a Distortion Correction slider with enable/disable option.
Lightroom 3 has the same thing, and it is equally nonfunctional. With the LX3, Panasonic made Adobe disable the ability to turn off distortion correction in ACR/LR (1,2). I suspect a similar thing is going on here. The disable option is nonfunctional. If you process the same RAW files using dcraw or Raw Developer, you'll see the actual distortion, which is marked. I showed this in the review at S.C.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Mosley View Post
Why would you do a pixel level comparison without CA correction, when it's easily available?
The same reason I show RAW conversions and not in-camera JPEGs. At S.C., the main emphasis has always been on the raw potential of the files coming off the sensor. There are many sites doing the opposite, focusing on the corrected files. I assume that people coming to S.C. for the tests know how to address CA in their own workflow. For some, this is not done in the RAW conversion but afterwards, and those folks may want to know that the CA is there needing that extra step.

The day will come soon when these CA and barrel distortion corrections are baked irreversibly into the RAW files. At that time, this discussion will be irrelevant. Until then, I think that those looking to get the most out of their gear will want to know exactly what is getting captured.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Mosley
My point is that if you're interested enough in pixel level detail, using the right tools - the difference between the two lenses can be much less than it seems over there.
If the goal is to show that image quality is good enough with the Olympus - and I believe that it is and said so in my review - no comparison crops are needed are needed. However, if you are trying to give insight into the difference between the two lenses, why sharpen one of their files more than the other? Why omit the two corners which show the greatest difference?

Using the right tools, I can show that a lens is much different than itself. Sharpening makes all the difference.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old July 26th, 2010, 09:28 AM
Djarum's Avatar
Senior Member


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 668
Djarum's Gallery
Default

Since this this discussion is more developed here, maybe I'll ask this. Distortion correction aside, looking at the original RAW files, I notice a few things. First is lateral CA with the Olympus. Now I understand that in camera jpeg Panny cameras will fix purple fringing, but this is different than latteral CA. Does panny fix lateral CA too in camera? Secondly, I also notice that there is a slight exposure difference even though that the shutter and aperature are the same. Is this due to processing or contrast differences in the actual lens?

I think review sites in general are going to have to go to two different approaches on judging lenses. The first is judging the standard jpeg, since many shooters shoot jpeg, and all they care about is jpeg out put. Then I think they are going to have to go to a raw conversion that does not apply any sort of corrections what so ever. Its a shame that certain raw converters are forced to apply correction settings by the manufacturer to convert the raw files. Why can't there be a universal standard for converting these files?(one reason I don't do RAW normally). Geesh, and here I thought the professional video industry had issues with SMPTE.

On edit, I do have a question. Does the lateral CA go away in the Olympus standard jpeg output?

Last edited by Djarum; July 26th, 2010 at 09:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old July 26th, 2010, 10:44 AM
Amin Sabet's Avatar
Founder
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA (United States)
Posts: 2,409
Amin Sabet's Gallery
Default

Dj, I virtually never shoot JPEG and so don't know the answer to your questions about in-camera correction of color fringing. I believe (but am not sure) that the Panasonic cameras fix lateral CA on in-camera JPEGs.

The differences in apparent exposure may be due to: 1) less light falloff with the Olympus lens, a nice characteristic of this lens; 2) changing light conditions (modestly changing cloud cover). If you look at the EXIF on the RAW files, the exposures were not totally constant. Some f/8 images were 1/160s, others 1/200s.

The reason I didn't compare sharpness on crops without distortion correction is that few people will use these lenses without distortion correction. I can process the files in Raw Developer without distortion correction, and the level of detail goes up, but as soon as you correct the distortion, there is a price to pay in resolution. I still think it's a shame that Lightroom, C1, and others don't let you shut off the distortion correction, because sometimes one wants that little bit of extra wide angle effect and maximum resolution.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old July 26th, 2010, 11:50 AM
Djarum's Avatar
Senior Member


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 668
Djarum's Gallery
Default

Thanks Amin for the candid response.

I'm not a wideangle person mainly due to the distortion issues with wideangle lenses. I was suprised to see the level of lateral CA though in the Olympus lens.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old July 29th, 2010, 04:20 PM
Brian Mosley's Avatar
Administrator


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,957
Blog Entries: 131
Brian Mosley's Gallery
Default

Taken this evening, scouting for our upcoming Safari Group event on the 21st August...

Giant ferris wheel, Sheffield city centre.

E-P2 + mZD 9-18mm f4-5.6
1/800s f/4.5 at 9.0mm iso200


Cheers

Brian
__________________
Founder, Olympus Photo Safari Group
http://www.ukphotosafari.org
Reply With Quote
The following 2 members thank Brian Mosley for this post:
  #38  
Old July 29th, 2010, 04:52 PM
Amin Sabet's Avatar
Founder
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA (United States)
Posts: 2,409
Amin Sabet's Gallery
Default

Very nice. Makes me a little dizzy like a Ferris wheel should.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old July 29th, 2010, 09:40 PM
PeterB666's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 436
PeterB666's Gallery
Default

I have no problems with image quality from the 9-18mm lens. It certainly is a compact and convenient lens.

I have struggled to get anywhere near the detail out of MFT compared to the Nikon cropped sensor cameras and full-frame Canon cameras that most of the people I shoot with manage. Part of that is my processing of images. I have gone part way there by changing to PhotoShop as my main editor and being more careful about destructive processing. Ultimately, the MFT and FT sensor is smaller than your average dSLR and Olympus and Panasonic need to do more work to bridge the gap.

Then again, it is all about compromise and I do appreciate the small size.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old July 30th, 2010, 10:42 AM
Djarum's Avatar
Senior Member


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 668
Djarum's Gallery
Default

Maybe in a different topic, but I'm not sure how detail is related to the actual size of sensor. Detail relates to the lens and number of pixels in the sensor.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old July 30th, 2010, 10:57 AM
Brian Mosley's Avatar
Administrator


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,957
Blog Entries: 131
Brian Mosley's Gallery
Default

Possibly also to dynamic range and noise performance... which can be influenced by sensor size - although there's really not much in it afaik between the 4/3rds sensor and APS-C.

Cheers

Brian
__________________
Founder, Olympus Photo Safari Group
http://www.ukphotosafari.org
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old July 31st, 2010, 10:25 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5
revzoom's Gallery
Default

From my own experience - and looking at the pic just above - I don't know how much more detail you can want or get. I had a Canon 5D with L glass and the EPL1 is a match for detail - especially with Leica lenses.
Reply With Quote
The following member thanks revzoom for this post:
  #43  
Old August 2nd, 2010, 08:20 AM
pictor's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 97
pictor's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterB666 View Post
I have struggled to get anywhere near the detail out of MFT compared to the Nikon cropped sensor cameras and full-frame Canon cameras that most of the people I shoot with manage.
The pixel density of the sensor of MFT is higher and needs carful work while taking photos. I can see significant better sharpness if I use a monopod than without . This helps me more than the IS to see as many details in my photos as possible.
__________________
"I continually see photographers walking around with huge camera bags on their shoulders and I just wonder how can you stop and smell the roses and observe life when you have a 20-pound bag hanging off your shoulder. It just mystifies me." (Steve McCurry)
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old August 2nd, 2010, 08:27 AM
pictor's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 97
pictor's Gallery
Default

I really love this lens, it is very sharp and has a nice bokeh:


Olympus E-PL1, 9mm @ f/4.0, 1/60, ISO 200
__________________
"I continually see photographers walking around with huge camera bags on their shoulders and I just wonder how can you stop and smell the roses and observe life when you have a 20-pound bag hanging off your shoulder. It just mystifies me." (Steve McCurry)
Reply With Quote
The following 2 members thank pictor for this post:
  #45  
Old August 5th, 2010, 04:09 AM
pictor's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 97
pictor's Gallery
Default

Is your copy of the 9-18mm completely smooth between 11mm and 14mm? I can feel an extremely slight jolt there. It is most noticeable if the camera is turned off while zooming out. I have not found any impact on functionality or image quality until now and hope, that it's just a lens element changing its direction while zooming at that position. Is this jolt normal?
__________________
"I continually see photographers walking around with huge camera bags on their shoulders and I just wonder how can you stop and smell the roses and observe life when you have a 20-pound bag hanging off your shoulder. It just mystifies me." (Steve McCurry)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
mzd 9-18mm, olympus 9-18mm

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.mu-43.com/f38/olympus-mzd-9-18mm-f4-5-6-experience-diary-3685/
Posted By For Type Date
Tests objectifs micro 4/3 Olympus M.Zuiko 14-150mm et 9-18mm - hybridcams.fr This thread Refback August 19th, 2010 09:57 AM
Olympus Photo Safari Group - Announcements This thread Refback July 28th, 2010 01:56 PM
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6 Lens Review This thread Refback July 25th, 2010 06:15 PM
Tests objectifs micro 4/3 Olympus M.Zuiko 14-150mm et 9-18mm | hybridcams.fr This thread Pingback June 18th, 2010 05:03 PM
Olympus Photo Safari Group - Announcements - Experience Diaries... mZD 9-18 and mZD14-150 This thread Refback June 18th, 2010 03:47 PM
Olympus M-Zuiko 14-150mm and 9-18mm Experience Diaries at mu-43.com - 1001 Noisy Cameras This thread Refback June 18th, 2010 02:57 PM
Olympus M-Zuiko 14-150mm and 9-18mm Experience Diaries at mu-43.com - 1001 Noisy Cameras This thread Refback June 18th, 2010 01:18 PM
Olympus M-Zuiko 14-150mm and 9-18mm Experience Diaries at mu-43.com - 1001 Noisy Cameras This thread Refback June 18th, 2010 01:12 PM
Olympus M-Zuiko 14-150mm and 9-18mm Experience Diaries at mu-43.com - 1001 Noisy Cameras This thread Refback June 18th, 2010 01:07 PM
1001 Noisy Cameras This thread Refback June 18th, 2010 01:06 PM
Fun with 4/3rds cameras/ Image Thread - Page 65 - The GetDPI Photography Forums This thread Refback June 17th, 2010 05:08 PM
Fun with 4/3rds cameras/ Image Thread - Page 65 - The GetDPI Photography Forums This thread Refback June 17th, 2010 03:14 PM

» Recent Discussions
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Template-Modifications by TMS