|
LeicaPlace |
|
|
12Thanks
 |
|
|

April 6th, 2012, 11:27 PM
|
|
|
Olympus 45mm f/1.8, Panasonic 20mm f/1.7, or Panasonic 14mm f/2.5 on E-PM1
Hello all,
To accompany my E-PM1 that I got today, I've decided to look around for a nice prime lens. I'm more of a night person, so a lot of my shots will be taken in low-lighting...without a tripod. For example, if I go to the fair at night, concerts, parties, and just casual indoor shooting, which lens would be better? The only concern I have with the Oly 45 is that it's not wide enough. I feel like it's easier for me to move closer to my target, than to move away from it.
I know these are two different beasts, but I can only afford one at the moment. The Oly 45 is almost double the price of the P14, but I know people love it.
At first, I was set on buying the P20, but after reading some reviews about low-light shooting and especially with the E-PM1, I've decided to look for other lenses... but I am still open to any suggestions.
Thanks for reading, and hopefully I'll be able to make my decision soon!
Last edited by Kelton; April 7th, 2012 at 01:47 AM.
|

April 6th, 2012, 11:55 PM
|
 |
Mu-43 All-Pro
|
|
|
|
I've spent a lot of time shooting with all three lenses on the PM1. I read some similar disparaging things about the 20 on the E-PM1, but I eventually bought it and it's worked out very, very well. It is a little on the slow side to focus and in some situations it will fail to focus lock entirely. This failure is very rare and has only come up in a tiny subset of situations. I held out on buying the 20 for months, but I wish I'd bought it instead of the 14 upfront. It really is good, including on the PM1.
The 14 is, at the end of the day, only a stop and change better than the kit zoom. A stop is better than nothing, but it's just not very compelling. Combined with the fact that is'a very wide angle view, I just didn't think it was a good payoff. But the lens is optically excellent, focuses very quickly, is tiny, and is generally fun to use.
Then there's the 45. The 45 is perfection. But it is long, long enough to make it very difficult for indoor use, parties, group situations, etc. It makes a wonderful outdoor street lens at night, a fantastic portrait lens, etc. But I almost never get decent use of this lens indoors.
My personal opinion is that the ideal PM1 kit is: kit zoom, 20mm, Oly 45mm. The kit zoom fills in as your versatile lens for decent light, and your 20 and 45 comprise short and long FLs for low light use. I feel that the 14 falls in an awkward halfway point between the 20's speed and the zoom's versatility.
If I had to pick just one of the 20 or 45...hmm. That would primarily be a choice between indoor and outdoor. I'd take the 45, but only just. The 20mm has also become very difficult to find lately.
Last edited by Promit; April 6th, 2012 at 11:58 PM.
|

April 6th, 2012, 11:58 PM
|
|
|
depends what you shoot,
if funds permit just get the 12mm :) its a beauty !!
otherwise the 20mm is pretty good as a walk around low light, so is the 25mm f1.4
it really depends what you like shooting.
my next lens will be the 25mm, the 45mm is a beautiful lens, so is the 12mm, but im missing something in between. the 45mm is a little long for hanging out with friends inside, unless you only want to shoot head shots.
__________________
website | 500px | GF2 | EM5 (pre order) | 12mm f2.0 | 45mm f1.8 | PL 25mm f1.4 wanted! |
|

April 7th, 2012, 01:39 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Promit
I've spent a lot of time shooting with all three lenses on the PM1. I read some similar disparaging things about the 20 on the E-PM1, but I eventually bought it and it's worked out very, very well. It is a little on the slow side to focus and in some situations it will fail to focus lock entirely. This failure is very rare and has only come up in a tiny subset of situations. I held out on buying the 20 for months, but I wish I'd bought it instead of the 14 upfront. It really is good, including on the PM1.
The 14 is, at the end of the day, only a stop and change better than the kit zoom. A stop is better than nothing, but it's just not very compelling. Combined with the fact that is'a very wide angle view, I just didn't think it was a good payoff. But the lens is optically excellent, focuses very quickly, is tiny, and is generally fun to use.
Then there's the 45. The 45 is perfection. But it is long, long enough to make it very difficult for indoor use, parties, group situations, etc. It makes a wonderful outdoor street lens at night, a fantastic portrait lens, etc. But I almost never get decent use of this lens indoors.
My personal opinion is that the ideal PM1 kit is: kit zoom, 20mm, Oly 45mm. The kit zoom fills in as your versatile lens for decent light, and your 20 and 45 comprise short and long FLs for low light use. I feel that the 14 falls in an awkward halfway point between the 20's speed and the zoom's versatility.
If I had to pick just one of the 20 or 45...hmm. That would primarily be a choice between indoor and outdoor. I'd take the 45, but only just. The 20mm has also become very difficult to find lately.
|
Thanks so much this review helped a lot. I'm still skeptical about the 20mm though... I don't want to miss an excellent shot due to some shortcomings with the 20mm and E-PM1...and like you said the Oly 45 is perfection, but it is such a long lens for the situations I'm trying to use it in. I heard the PL25 is a really great lens too, but it's quite expensive :/. I've seen the 20mm for sale in the forums for $300. I guess what I could do is buy the lens and try it out. If I don't like it, I can just sell it for almost what I pay for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bedojo
depends what you shoot,
if funds permit just get the 12mm :) its a beauty !!
otherwise the 20mm is pretty good as a walk around low light, so is the 25mm f1.4
it really depends what you like shooting.
my next lens will be the 25mm, the 45mm is a beautiful lens, so is the 12mm, but im missing something in between. the 45mm is a little long for hanging out with friends inside, unless you only want to shoot head shots.
|
Well in my OP, I wrote about what I shoot haha. The 12mm is something I would like, but too expensive for me to purchase right now...I believe that the 25mm is a good trade off between the two, but it's expensive as well at around 500$.
Last edited by Kelton; April 7th, 2012 at 01:43 AM.
|

April 7th, 2012, 01:45 AM
|
 |
Super Mod Emeritus
|
|
|
|
I've had the 20 for ages (it's probably one of the few lenses I wouldn't consider selling) and I've had it on everything form an E-P1 to an E-P3 and it's not so slow as to make it less useable and the IQ more than makes up for it.
|

April 7th, 2012, 01:54 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixeyk
I've had the 20 for ages (it's probably one of the few lenses I wouldn't consider selling) and I've had it on everything form an E-P1 to an E-P3 and it's not so slow as to make it less useable and the IQ more than makes up for it.
|
I'm strongly considering it at this point haha. I tried taking indoor shots with the kit lens that came with my E-PM1 earlier tonight, but they all came out pretty terribly. I really NEED a lens that will work very well in low-light situations... which is almost always for me :P.
|

April 7th, 2012, 01:59 AM
|
 |
Mu-43 Top Veteran
|
|
|
|
I'd go with the 20. Its my social and party low-light lens.
Its also far more pocketable (or palmable) on an E-PM1.
Before I got the 20 and 45 I used the manual focus Pen F 38 and 40 which were 45(ish) equivalents - they took lovely shots but I found I had to either take a step back in order to fit in the things I wanted to fit in.
Next party or social event I'll definitely be taking both the 20 and 45 to see which one I end up using the most (the 20 feels more natural but the 45 focuses a bit faster).
Decisions, decisions ;-)
|

April 7th, 2012, 02:02 AM
|
 |
Mu-43 Regular
|
|
|
|
The 20 was the first lens I bought to go with my e-pl1 2 years ago. It's a great little lens, and sees a lot o use both indoors and out. It's perfect for group shots inside, and makes an awesome walkaround lens. That said, there have always been times when I wished I didn't have to get so close to get the shot I wanted. I had been using an adapted 50/1.4 to fill this gap, but I recently picked up the oly 45. It's another great lens, and highly recommended. They're both great at different things. Why not get both? Or, if price is a concern, get the 20 or versatility and a legacy 50 for reach. if you find yourself using the 50 a lot, you can always pick up the 45 down the road.
|

April 7th, 2012, 03:24 AM
|
 |
Mu-43 All-Pro
|
|
|
|
the 45mm will be great for concerts. the 12mm and 25mm for indoor parties/ casual activities.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kelton
I feel like it's easier for me to move closer to my target, than to move away from it.
|
12mm; albeit pricey.
__________________
Thanks for viewing.
Regards,
Jimmy
µ43rd rocks!!
|

April 7th, 2012, 09:51 AM
|
 |
Super Mod Emeritus
|
|
|
|
The P20 and the Olympus 45 are really amazing lenses. The 14 is also quite good but not in the same league as the other two. It really boils down to what you need it for. If you want low light and general purpose the 20's FOV and speed are really going to be more useful for you. Last night I shot pictures of our Passover Seder with my E-P3 and the 20 (lit by a dim overhead light and candles). Here are a few wide open (hence the very shallow DOF). They're not great shots but you can see what the lens can do wide open. Mind you these were just things I snapped quickly.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
More Discussions |
|
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
|
|
More Member Ads |
|
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
|
|
FTC Disclosure |
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.
|
|