July 14th, 2012, 04:37 PM
|
 |
Mu-43 Top Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 903
Real Name: Chris Chrisnmn's Gallery
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kwalsh
By all accounts the Nikon 14-24 is about the best UWA zoom in existence, and the D800 the best FF body in existence. So, relevant to this thread would be this pretty neat comparison of the D800/14-24 vs the E-M5/7-14 over on DPR. Obviously the D800/14-24 is better. What is interesting is just how well the E-M5/7-14 does in comparison.
This link:
Re: Nicely done! Request for those working the RAWs:: Micro Four Thirds Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review
Provides 50MP upsampled images from each combination. RAW files from the OP are available in the thread as well.
FWIW, I've got the 7-14. It is the lens that made me both enter and stick with m43 coming from Canon land. It is one of the better UWA lenses in any system. On Olympus bodies there is residual CA. Shoot RAW, remove CA in LR or ACR and it isn't a problem at all. You can even setup an automatic import preset to do it for you.
Ken |
Thats a pretty awesome review thanks for pointing it out! That was exactly what i was looking for. Eventhough the pana looks like an spectacular lens across platforms, and being the OMD one of the best "small" cameras out there now, it does shows its limitations in situations like this when compared to a FF camera. But already said before, this are twp different formats with different usage and for me they complement each other.
|
5Thanks
