Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Native Lenses

Native Lenses Lenses designed specifically for Micro Four Thirds

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree16Thanks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old August 12th, 2011, 05:55 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington State, USA
Posts: 252
Tom Swaman's Gallery
Default The Magic 14mm.....

I am looking for a comparison of results, i.e. image quality and gear handling of shooting the Panny 7-14mm, 14mm, 14-42mm and the 14-140mm at a focal length of 14mm. How do the results compare when these different lenses are shot at 14mm. Which lens produces the best overall results and what are the drawbacks of the other Panasonic lenses. Oh yes, i do realize that Panasonic makes other lenses that can be shot at 14mm and also that my list includes both 4/3rds and micro 4/3rds lenses.

Thanks for sharing your experiences and knowledge.

Best regards,
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 12th, 2011, 06:29 PM
Ray Sachs's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Near Philadephila
Posts: 2,439
Ray Sachs's Gallery
Default

I have the 14, have had the 14-140, and have shot with the 14-45 (not the 14-42). I haven't used the 7-14, but own and use the Olympus kit lens (well, I don't actually use this much), the 9-18, and the 14-150, so I've had 14mm pretty well covered. I've seen various people contend that the 14-42 is visually as sharp as the 14mm prime - I don't know that I've heard anyone claim quite the same for the longer or wider zooms. I'm not a big enough pixel peeper to really be able to tell you, but they're all decent optically and the 14mm is at least as good as any. In terms of handling, focus speed, and low light, the 14mm pancake is a fairly easy call. F2.5 is a good bit faster than any of the zooms, the lens is VERY fast and VERY quiet to AF, and it takes up only slightly more room than a body cap would.

If I was looking for a zoom, I wouldn't hesitate to buy a zoom - they don't suck by a long shot. But if you want to spend the bulk of your time in 14mm and if you like shooting with primes, go for the prime.

Not sure if this is the kind of input you're looking for, but its all I've got.

-Ray
Thanked by Alanroseman.
__________________
Olympus OMD EM5 with several lenses, Fuji X-Pro with three lenses, Ricoh GXR with one lens/sensor unit, Panasonic LX7...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 12th, 2011, 06:33 PM
DHart's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Great Pacific NorthWest
Posts: 2,067
DHart's Gallery
Default

There are some good points raised here:

The Panasonic 14mm 2.5 Micro 4/3 Lens Review by Steve Huff | STEVE HUFF PHOTOS
__________________
Don
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 12th, 2011, 09:20 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington State, USA
Posts: 252
Tom Swaman's Gallery
Default

Thanks all. What about the 7-14mm 4/3rds zoom at 14mm and the 14-140mm at 13mm compared with the 14mm pancacke?

Best regards,
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 12th, 2011, 10:22 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 478
drizek's Gallery
Default

dpreview can compare the 7-14 m4/3 to the 14-140

dpreview.com - Lens Review - Fullscreen

The 14-140 is surprisingly sharp at 14mm.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 12th, 2011, 10:30 PM
DHart's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Great Pacific NorthWest
Posts: 2,067
DHart's Gallery
Default

The 14-140 is a stellar lens. It's the one zoom lens I would definitely want to have along with a trio of primes (12, 25, 45). The 14-45 is fantastic and so compact, but the 14-140 is much more versatile with that nice long reach! Much bigger and heavier, though. The OIS system in the 14-140 is stunningly effective. I have repeatedly shot hand held, at 1/15th sec. the 14-140 at 140mm (280mm equivalent) with very crisp images resulting from the OIS. It works amazingly well.
__________________
Don
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 12th, 2011, 11:14 PM
RT_Panther's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,888
RT_Panther's Gallery
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Swaman View Post
Ithe Panny 7-14mm,
Best regards,
Tom
If you can afford it,
I'd choose this over the Olympus 9-18.....Just my personal preference...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 12th, 2011, 11:15 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 478
drizek's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DHART
The 14-140 is a stellar lens. It's the one zoom lens I would definitely want to have along with a trio of primes (12, 25, 45). The 14-45 is fantastic and so compact, but the 14-140 is much more versatile with that nice long reach! Much bigger and heavier, though. The OIS system in the 14-140 is stunningly effective. I have repeatedly shot hand held, at 1/15th sec. the 14-140 at 140mm (280mm equivalent) with very crisp images resulting from the OIS. It works amazingly well.
I just started playing with that slider and at 25mm it is incredible. That's one of the sharpest lenses I've seen. It's slow, but at around f5 or so it doesn't seem any different than the 20mm prime at 18mm. At the tele end it doesn't do so hot, but it is still pretty impressive on the wider angles. It's sharper and faster than the 14-45.

Just going off of the MFT chart, this looks like it could make for a pretty nice lens.

Edit: $800. Ah, there's the rub :)

Last edited by drizek; August 12th, 2011 at 11:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 12th, 2011, 11:22 PM
DHart's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Great Pacific NorthWest
Posts: 2,067
DHart's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drizek View Post
$800. Ah, there's the rub :)
Yes... the 14-140 is most economically acquired when you are buying your GH2!
__________________
Don
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 13th, 2011, 02:56 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington State, USA
Posts: 252
Tom Swaman's Gallery
Default

I agree, the 14-140mm is the best high zoom ratio lens I have seen. Also, I am amazed at both its AF speed and its low noise level. Overall, this is a totally acceptably sharp and acceptably contrasty lens for 90% of my shooting. "Heavy," you say. Prior to my GH2 I shot Nikon D 300 and used the 24-70mm and the 70-200mm most of the time. Both were excellent lenses and great in relatively low light at f/2.8. However, weight-wise, these are like a semi-truck compared to the lightweight 14-140mm. Suffice it to say, I love my 14-130mm.

What I am trying to find out is which Panny Leica lens is their sharpest and most uniform at 14mm? Also, specifically, how does the 14mm compare with the 7-14mm at 14mm?

Best regards,
Tom
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com