Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Native Lenses

Native Lenses Lenses designed specifically for Micro Four Thirds

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree7Thanks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11  
Old July 15th, 2012, 02:35 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 85
Antonio's Gallery
Default distant birds

These Hyacinth Macaws were VERY high up in a tree in Pantanal, Brazil. This was taken with the Panasonic 100-300mm plus an extended telephoto feature of the Olympus OMD-EM5. The 100-300mm is great.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old July 15th, 2012, 04:47 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 83
RenaudVL's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antonio View Post
These Hyacinth Macaws were VERY high up in a tree in Pantanal, Brazil. This was taken with the Panasonic 100-300mm plus an extended telephoto feature of the Olympus OMD-EM5. The 100-300mm is great.
Nice shot, do you mean Digital Tele-converter in the shooting menu of the OMD-EM5 by extended telephoto feature?

Thanks

Renaud
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old July 15th, 2012, 05:59 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 85
Antonio's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RenaudVL View Post
Nice shot, do you mean Digital Tele-converter in the shooting menu of the OMD-EM5 by extended telephoto feature?

Thanks

Renaud
I am sorry but I just realized that I did not use the Digital Tele-converter for that photo. The photo below was taken with the extended telephoto feature of the OMD-EM5:

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old July 16th, 2012, 12:16 PM
Ihavenewfs's Avatar
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, USA
Posts: 64
Ihavenewfs's Gallery
Default Hand Held?

All of these images are dynamite! Were these shots taken with the camera handheld or on a tripod?

I have an EPL-2 and was wondering if the Pany 100-300 would be like the proverbial odd-couple size-wise
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old July 16th, 2012, 03:05 PM
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Southwest Virginia
Posts: 629
Real Name: Kristi
foxtail1's Gallery
Default

The 100–300 is a good size lens. It definitely looks big compared to my G3, but not crazed like some of those giant lenses.

I don't think I've posted any of my bird shots in this thread — they're in the Nature: Birds thread — but I shoot handheld only.
__________________
Kristi

Panasonic Lumix G5
Panasonic Lumix G3
Lumix 7–14 mm, 14 mm 2.5, 14–45 mm, 100–300 mm
Panasonic Leica 45 mm F2.8 macro

My photos on Flickr
Comments and critiques welcomed!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old July 16th, 2012, 03:41 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 134
Starred's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antonio View Post
I am sorry but I just realized that I did not use the Digital Tele-converter for that photo. The photo below was taken with the extended telephoto feature of the OMD-EM5:

Whats the difference between digital teleconverter and extended telephoto?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old July 16th, 2012, 03:45 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 362
The Minimalist's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ihavenewfs View Post
All of these images are dynamite! Were these shots taken with the camera handheld or on a tripod?

I have an EPL-2 and was wondering if the Pany 100-300 would be like the proverbial odd-couple size-wise
All my shots on page one of this thread are handheld. I have only used a tripod once with this lens and that was to shoot the moon with it.

I use it with a Pana GF1 which is roughly about the same size and shape as your EPL-2.
Thanked by Ihavenewfs.
__________________
Darren
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old July 16th, 2012, 03:53 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 286
strang's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starred View Post
Whats the difference between digital teleconverter and extended telephoto?
Digital tele-converter is a crop. So your image resolution is halved. You can do this on your own with any post processing software. Even MS Paint. All you do is resize the canvas.

The non-digital tele-converter is a physical part. Panasonic calls their Tele-converter lens, DMW-GTC1.



It's a $149 part you can buy. You attach it to the end of your lens to double the magnification, but you don't lose any image resolution. Most people will mean this when they say they used a tele-converter.

However I thought the tele-converter only works on the Panasonic 14-42mm kit lens.

Panasonic also makes macro, wide-angle and fisheye.

Olympus makes macro, wide-angle and fisheye. However no tele-converter.

Last edited by strang; July 16th, 2012 at 03:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old July 16th, 2012, 07:18 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 85
Antonio's Gallery
Default Toucan in Pantanal, Brazil



Olympus OMD-EM5, Panasonic 100-300mm
Thanked by Ihavenewfs.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old July 17th, 2012, 12:31 AM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 134
Starred's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strang View Post
Digital tele-converter is a crop. So your image resolution is halved. You can do this on your own with any post processing software. Even MS Paint. All you do is resize the canvas.

The non-digital tele-converter is a physical part. Panasonic calls their Tele-converter lens, DMW-GTC1.



It's a $149 part you can buy. You attach it to the end of your lens to double the magnification, but you don't lose any image resolution. Most people will mean this when they say they used a tele-converter.

However I thought the tele-converter only works on the Panasonic 14-42mm kit lens.

Panasonic also makes macro, wide-angle and fisheye.

Olympus makes macro, wide-angle and fisheye. However no tele-converter.
Ok, but then I still do not know what he exactly means by writing:
Quote:
I am sorry but I just realized that I did not use the Digital Tele-converter for that photo. The photo below was taken with the extended telephoto feature of the OMD-EM5

What is the extended telephoto feature of the EM5?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com