YES! I very badly want to see a 300mm or 400mm f/4 prime. I wouldn't turn down something like a 70-200 f/2.8, either (or even f/4).

Right now, all the telephoto options are slow, variable aperture consumer zooms. I want a true, pro level wildlife lens

I vote for native teleconverters, with all the electrical contacts working. Beyond that, then next OMD model is rumoured to *somehow* support those FourThirds format lenses, so I seriously doubt they'll spend resources converting the less mainstream ones to MicroFourThirds format.

The 50-200 is almost a no-brainer. But, yes, (fast, expensive and high quality) primes also would be an absolute godsend to wildlife shooters. We are talking 1/3 the total weight of an equivalent DSLR setup. And, with Olympus bodies, IS would go a long way into convincing wildlife shooters into .

For the rest of us, the 50-200 or similar would be the perfect all-around long telephoto.

__________________
http://500px.com/Eyes_Unclouded_Photography
http://eyesunclouded-photography.blogspot.gr/
http://www.facebook.com/eyesunclouded

I'd also like to see some more options at the telephoto end, a 300mm F4 + teleconverters or a zoom until around 400mm F/5.6 would be very nice on this system.
Wildlife or any kind of long distance shooting is an obvious choice for this system IMHO, so why not more choices?

__________________
www.fernandobatista.smugmug.com

Most definitely. At present with the native zooms you're restricted to around F/5.6 or slower once you get to around 300 mm. Even an F/4 150 mm would make a difference when it comes to shooting things like birds in areas of shadow or in low light at either end of the day.

I second the motion: 100mm is too short for a telephoto. I know the Panny 12-35mm is an ideal fast short zoom but a 12-60/2.8-4 port would be more useful for me as a walkaround street lens.

50-200/2.8-3.5 is an OM-D user's wet dream. Heck, it's my wet dream. I love my Oly 75-300 but I'll ditch it in a heartbeat as soon as an MFT adaptation of that lens is announced.

Here's to praying for a holy trinity of zooms: 7-14/4 (thanks to Panny), 12-60/2.8-4 and 50-200/2.8-3.5. Any other takers?!

E-M5, O75, PL25, O12, O75-300

__________________
Pediatric oncologist, photo enthusiast, and proud Pinoy!

E-M5, mZD 12/2, mZD 17/1.8, mZD 60/2.8, mZD 75/1.8, mZD 75-300/4.8-6.7 II (and they all fit albeit snugly in my Billingham Hadley small)

www.pixoto.com/omdem5

I've been using my Tamron 90mm (+2x teleconverter) a lot but I'd prefer a longer 150/200mm macro that is REALLY sharp. That would be ideal for my kind of nature shooting (macro & birds).

__________________
my equipment:
- Olympus E-PL1 | Olympus E-PM1 | Olympus E-M5
- Lumix G: 14mm f/2.5 | 20mm f/1.7 | 100-300mm f/4-5.6
- Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED: 14-150mm f/4-5.6 | 45mm f/1.8 | 60mm f/2.8
- Konica Hexanon: 50mm f/1.7 | 135mm f/3.5
- Tamron: 70-210mm f/3.8-4.0 | 90mm f/2.5 (52BB) | 500mm f/8 mirror
- VF-2

Some Dropbox-albums of mine: Landscape | Macro | Misc | Doggies | Singapore+Australia 2012 | All public albums

I'd love to see an F4 tele, 200mm would be fine, as well as a native 1.4x telecon. A 50-200 constant F4 (or 2.8-3.5) wouldn't be a bad idea either. Although I think they would be best served by improved PDAF and tracking AF bodies which don't quite exist yet.

I mean, the 100-300 is a nice lens, but it can't touch my 100-400L for EOS. And I don't even rate that lens ridiculously highly.

__________________
EOS: 5DII, 30DIR, 24-105L, 35L, 135L, 15/2.8 FE, Σ 50/1.4, Σ 105/2.8 macro
Mu43: GF2, E-M5, P14/2.5, P20/1.7, O45/1.8, P7-14, O12-50, P12-35, P100-300
Legacy: Contax Zeiss 50/1.4, 35/2.8, Leica R 50/2.0, 28/2.8, Pentax 50/1.7