Micro Four Thirds User Forum Lensbaby Tilt Transformer

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Lenses and Accessories > Native Lenses

Lensbaby
Amazon
B&H Photo
Nik Software


Mu-43 members get
15% off Nik Apps
Coupon code: MU-43
Europe info here
Think Tank Photo
Introducing the New Retrospective®5 Camera Bag
Serious Compacts
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old September 7th, 2010, 05:01 PM
x2h x2h is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
x2h's Gallery
Question 28/2?

Hi everyone, my working view is equivalent to 28 mm. Looks like there's no native MFT 28 mm yet. What would be my choice if I want a 28/2 or even 28/1.4? Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 7th, 2010, 05:16 PM
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 645
Brian S's Gallery
Default

Nikon has made a 28/2, available since ~1970. A lot are around. It is not a small lens, about the same size as an 85mm telephoto. Mine was $100, "good user" meaning cosmetically ugly. Konica made a 28/1.8 that is terrific, but uncommon and more expensive. 28/1.4's are around, and run a good bit, ~$500 or up.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 7th, 2010, 05:19 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 60
shawngibson's Gallery
Default

Only lens I can think of is Oly 14-35/2.0. Nothing else will give you close to those specs, and certainly not a prime. Unfortunately, it's very expensive, but has a lot of positive reviews...though it is far from small.

How narrow are you willing to go? And how much willing to lose in aperture?

edit: sorry are you saying you want the equivalent to 28mm in a 35mm system, or 28 uFT?

Shawn
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 7th, 2010, 05:22 PM
pdh pdh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 609
Blog Entries: 435
pdh's Gallery
Default

but does the OP mean 28mm on m4/3 or 35mm ? if the latter then he's looking for a 14mm f/1.4 which might be expensive ...

EDIT: oops too late ...
__________________
My photostream at Flickr.com is here

"To think like someone else, you have to remember that they don't think they're wrong"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 7th, 2010, 05:45 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 68
Spanjaart's Gallery
Default

Either way a good 1.4 28mm would set you back a good part of your life's savings or even all of it in the worst case even if you owned a well kept mansion.
__________________
Loads of Nikon stuff and an Oly E-PM1 and 14, 45 lenses
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 7th, 2010, 07:55 PM
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 645
Brian S's Gallery
Default

For a fast, wide-angle, cheap price- I'm using a C-Mount lens. It vignettes at the corners. I've read threads on GETDPI.COM where two members disassembled the C-Mount lens and moved the front section in closer to the rear module to reduce vignetting. I have not done that, might take a look at the Kowa 12.5mm F1.4 lens that I have.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 7th, 2010, 10:36 PM
e.besana's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tarrytown, NY
Posts: 63
e.besana's Gallery
Default

@ x2h: I have a vivitar 28mm f2. I picked it up on ebay for $25. It is prone to flare so for outdoors a hood is a must. It is also not very sharp at f2 but definitely usable. f4 and up yield some very nice images. IMO nice bokeh. good for the price. -eb

there's a front view image of it in my gallery
__________________
Oly E-P2, Zuiko 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6, Panny 20mm f/1.7

Last edited by e.besana; September 7th, 2010 at 10:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old September 7th, 2010, 11:32 PM
OzRay's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 804
OzRay's Gallery
Default

Voigtlander make a very good and small 28mm f2 in M mount.



Cheers

Ray
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old September 8th, 2010, 11:26 PM
x2h x2h is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
x2h's Gallery
Default

thanks for all the enthusiastic replies in such a short period of time! makes me feel like home right away. sorry i was a little vague, but i meant 28 mm equivalent to 135, which means 14 mm on MFT. I know there are 28 mm lens under 135 but they are too big for the purpose of using my GF1. i am wondering if there's a 14mm/2 lens for MFT. thanks for any input!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old September 17th, 2010, 01:09 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Beautiful BC, Canada
Posts: 10
neilvan's Gallery
Default

There is always the OM 28mm f2, it ain't cheap, but it's pretty!
__________________
Neil
http://thewarmland.com/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Lensbaby Tilt Transformer
Lensbaby Tilt Transformer
B&H Photo
Recent Discussions
Go to first new post [Ebay] EP-2 17mm kit
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Template-Modifications by TMS