Micro Four Thirds User Forum DSPTCH SeriousCompacts.com - Quality Photography Using Smaller Cameras Mu-43.com - Micro 4/3 User Group TalkNEX.com - Sony NEX User Group FujiXspot.com - Fuji X Photographers LeicaPlace.com - Leica Photography User Group

Go Back   Micro Four Thirds User Forum > Tests and Reviews > Featured Tests and Reviews

Ads by Google
LeicaPlace
B&H Photo
Thank Tree36Thanks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old November 4th, 2012, 10:45 AM
Amin Sabet's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA (United States)
Posts: 6,864
Real Name: Amin
Amin Sabet's Gallery
Default Olympus E-PM2 Image Stabilization Test with Comparison to E-M5

I set out to test the effectiveness of the E-PM2 image stabilization against that of the E-M5 using the Olympus 75mm f/1.8 lens at a variety of shutter speeds with or without in-body image stabilization (IBIS, mode 1) engaged.

For each setting I took 10 handheld images without burst mode, refocusing for each shot. 100% center crops are shown below for each series. All samples are presented below without commentary.







__________________
Amin
Mu-43.com Webmaster (Site FAQ | Help Forum | My Disclosures | My Flickriver | My G+ Profile)

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates. We get a small referral fee when you buy after clicking our link. Your price is unaffected.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 4th, 2012, 10:55 AM
Amin Sabet's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA (United States)
Posts: 6,864
Real Name: Amin
Amin Sabet's Gallery
Default

Main findings:

-E-M5 IBIS is more effective than E-PM2 IBIS, especially at low shutter speeds.

-At all shutter speeds with both cameras, IBIS gave more consistent results than no IBIS.

-At 1/100s, the sharpest results from both cameras came with IBIS off. This was particularly noticeable with the E-PM2, where none of the shots with IBIS on were critically sharp.


UPDATE:

Kyle and Art made me aware of the role for the anti-shock setting. I set it to 1/8s as they suggested and got the following results with the E-M5:



Seems to me that this setting completely addresses the issue with IBIS at 1/100s, albeit at the expense of a slight increase in shutter lag and viewfinder blackout time.. Preliminary results are that even with this setting the E-PM2 results were not ideal at 1/100s. I'm continuing to look at this and will update with any new findings.
__________________
Amin
Mu-43.com Webmaster (Site FAQ | Help Forum | My Disclosures | My Flickriver | My G+ Profile)

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates. We get a small referral fee when you buy after clicking our link. Your price is unaffected.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 4th, 2012, 11:35 AM
Jonathan F/2's Avatar
Mu-43 Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 2,109
Jonathan F/2's Gallery
Default

Looks like the E-M5's IBIS is slightly better at lower shutter speeds. The 5-axis IBIS looks to be showing it's advantage here. Thanks for the test Amin!
__________________
Jonathan
--
www.jonathanfriolo.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 4th, 2012, 11:43 AM
Robstar1963's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Isle of Wight England UK
Posts: 372
Real Name: Robert
Robstar1963's Gallery
Default

Thanks Amin
Very interesting and clearly demonstrates the advantages of and differences between the IBIS systems
I would love to see a similar comparison between the two Olympus systems and the Panasonic OIS system ?
Regards
Rob
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 4th, 2012, 12:25 PM
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 260
b_rubenstein's Gallery
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amin Sabet View Post
-At 1/100s, the sharpest results from both cameras came with IBIS off. This was particularly noticeable with the E-PM2, where none of the shots with IBIS on were critically sharp.
I found a similar difference between E-M5 and E-PL2 in the same shutter speed range. My experience with Nikon in lens IS was that such anomalies didn't exist for a given camera lens combination. However, some lens' IS worked much better on one body (D200) than another (D7000).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 4th, 2012, 12:31 PM
Mu-43 Top Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 917
Real Name: Larry
Lawrence A.'s Gallery
Default

Guess I'll turn off the IBIS except when I need it. I've known I should, but this demonstrates that at higher shutter speeds there may be a distinct disadvantage to using it. Thanks for challenging my lazy habits. (Strange, too, I never especially miss stabilization when I'm shooting my primitive film cameras, but I do take more care at speeds below the reciprocal of the focal length.)
__________________
Du noir s'en vient
Le clair qu'il a.

Guillevic
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 4th, 2012, 12:43 PM
BAXTING's Avatar
Mu-43 Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 346
BAXTING's Gallery
Default

thanks for doing that!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 4th, 2012, 12:50 PM
Mu-43 Regular
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: EU
Posts: 87
micz87's Gallery
Default

Whoa! thanks for patience in preparing so many comparsion shots :) Ability to make 50% sharp shots on 150mm eqiv. on 1/25 is great result for OM-D
__________________
MFourThirds my mu43 blog on facebook, like it

G3, P20, O45, O9-18, P14-42, P45-200
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 4th, 2012, 12:52 PM
Ulfric M Douglas's Avatar
Mu-43 All-Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 1,085
Ulfric M Douglas's Gallery
Default

Good method, and tedious to show so thanks for doing the drudgery.

Now would it even be possible to persuade Olympus to insert a shutterspeed-dependant IBIS switch?
__________________
Oly e-P1&17mmF2.8 e-600, e-410&40-150MkI, E-1&14-54MkI, Tokyo-Koki 300mm
Lumix G1&Yashinon45F1.7, e-pL1&CZJ135F3.5, e-P2&45mm. e-pL2&30mmF2.8
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old November 4th, 2012, 12:54 PM
Amin Sabet's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA (United States)
Posts: 6,864
Real Name: Amin
Amin Sabet's Gallery
Default

I leave on IBIS all the time unless using a tripod. I don't think it has any negative consequences at very fast shutter speeds. At middle of the road shutter speeds, it seems there is a trade-off of max sharpness and consistency.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Mu-43 App
__________________
Amin
Mu-43.com Webmaster (Site FAQ | Help Forum | My Disclosures | My Flickriver | My G+ Profile)

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates. We get a small referral fee when you buy after clicking our link. Your price is unaffected.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Useful thread?
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


B&H Photo
Find Us on the Web
Latest Discussions
More Discussions
Click the "101 Active Discussions" tab at the top of the page.
Latest Member Ads
More Member Ads
Click the "Buy and Sell" tab at the top of the page.
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyright © 2000-2012 Mu-43.com