Micro Four Thirds User Forum http://www.mu-43.com/ en Thu, 23 May 2013 02:09:37 GMT vBulletin 60 http://www.mu-43.com/images/misc/rss.jpg Micro Four Thirds User Forum http://www.mu-43.com/ SLR Magic Noktor 50mm f/0.95 as a portrait lens? http://www.mu-43.com/f38/slr-magic-noktor-50mm-f-0-95-portrait-lens-46633/ Wed, 22 May 2013 22:37:14 GMT Hi I wanted to know has anyone has outstanding results using the NOktor 50mm f0.95?

I'm thinking buying this or the Oly 45mm f.18.

The noktor is super fast but super expensive.

The oly also fast and a lot cheaper.

Haven't seen many images with the noktor 50mm if you have some feel free to post please. ]]> Native Lenses cuervo.taylor http://www.mu-43.com/f38/slr-magic-noktor-50mm-f-0-95-portrait-lens-46633/ Leica R, Contax/Yashica shooters: SpeedBooster MFT adapter is now available http://www.mu-43.com/f40/leica-r-contax-yashica-shooters-speedbooster-mft-adapter-now-available-46632/ Wed, 22 May 2013 22:14:02 GMT Disclaimer: I'm not associated with MetaBones in any way. Not that I wouldn't mind if they're interested...

anyway...

Some of you may have heard of the MetaBones SpeedBooster focal reducer adapter. Short story of the concept, it makes use of the "dead space" in SLR-to-mirrorless lens adapters to add focal reduction optics that lead to a ~0.7x focal length reduction and a ~1-stop speed increase - rather like an inverse teleconverter. In other words, an inexpensive 50/2 suddenly effectively becomes a ~35/1.4. Reviews of these adapters with NEX cameras has been generally positive.

Anyway, at long last, the MFT-Leica R and MFT-C/Y Speedbooster adapters are now available.
Micro 4/3 System : Leica R Lens to Micro Four Thirds Speed Booster

With a nice set of R primes, I'll be ordering one after a few more invoices are received this month. Word is that many other adapters are planned, notably including Nikon, OM, and a fully electronic Canon EF version. ]]> Adapted Lenses McBob http://www.mu-43.com/f40/leica-r-contax-yashica-shooters-speedbooster-mft-adapter-now-available-46632/ focal reducer with hexanon 50mm http://www.mu-43.com/f40/focal-reducer-hexanon-50mm-46614/ Wed, 22 May 2013 11:20:44 GMT Hope to adapt skywatcher 0.85 reducer to my hexanon 50mm f1.4. Should be like 85mm f1.2. Need assistance. Would it be same sharp f2-2.8?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Skywatcher-0...item1e7a6ffd72 ]]> Adapted Lenses andrusho http://www.mu-43.com/f40/focal-reducer-hexanon-50mm-46614/ Can you view pictures in 3D on a normal TV (with 3D glasses) out of the 3D lens? http://www.mu-43.com/f38/can-you-view-pictures-3d-normal-tv-3d-glasses-out-3d-lens-46605/ Wed, 22 May 2013 02:34:48 GMT Hi guys,

So, I'm thinking about picking up the little Panasonic 12.5mm 3D lens as a fun little toy for when I get the OM-D...however...I read somewhere that you can view it with red/blue or whatever glasses on a normal TV...is that true? Or do you ABSOLUTELY have to get a 3D TV?

Also...this'll work just fine on the OM-D, right? (B&H says it only works on certain Panasonics, but I think that's out of date...so I thought I'd ask). ]]> Native Lenses LowriderS10 http://www.mu-43.com/f38/can-you-view-pictures-3d-normal-tv-3d-glasses-out-3d-lens-46605/ Super Tak 135 screwmount: 2.5 or 3.5?? http://www.mu-43.com/f40/super-tak-135-screwmount-2-5-3-5-a-46586/ Tue, 21 May 2013 19:35:51 GMT I am looking at maybe getting a screwmount Super Tak 135, and am trying to decide between the f/2.5 and 3.5. I've had the 3.5. It was fine, especially stopped one click to 4.0. The extra speed on the 2.5 would be nice, and a more standard filter width (58mm) but I don't know much about the optical characteristics of that lens.

Anyone ever compare these two, either on Pentax cameras or especially adapted to m43? ]]> Adapted Lenses WT21 http://www.mu-43.com/f40/super-tak-135-screwmount-2-5-3-5-a-46586/ Good first lens for OMD http://www.mu-43.com/f38/good-first-lens-omd-46571/ Tue, 21 May 2013 14:41:36 GMT hi guys, new to the forum and recently picked up a silver omd em5 with the 14-42mm kit lens. I am a professional photographer and have always used canon, I purchased the OMD as a backup to my main and for timelapse work. However since purchasing I am beginning to become intrigued by this camera as a walk around camera instead of my hefty 1ds3 yet the IQ is pretty dismal and as of yet I cannot tell first hand if it is the lens of the camera. Reviews say the sensor is pretty amazing so I'm curious as to a good piece of glass to start out with. I don't need to build an arsenal of lenses for it for professional work but I wouldnt mind doing it just for fun!

I have no experience with 4/3 or u4/3 so I dont know where to start. For the veterans, if you had your time again what would be your first lens in terms of sheer IQ or joy in using.
Thanks everyone! ]]> Native Lenses oschebell http://www.mu-43.com/f38/good-first-lens-omd-46571/ Why does Oly like retracting/locking lenses? http://www.mu-43.com/f38/why-does-oly-like-retracting-locking-lenses-46562/ Tue, 21 May 2013 10:25:24 GMT I don't particularly like them only because it inserts some additional step (however minor) into the process of getting the camera ready to take a picture. This is obviously more of an issue in an immediate-mode hurry-up-and-take-it photo when the event is not going to last much longer, but that can be the source of some of the best shots. This design characteristic has led me to use only primes from Oly (which can be the fastest solution unless that prime is the wrong length, then it really slows it down).

So... While there is probably a very good reason for it, is it possible that Oly will ever make any non-retractable zooms (and maybe they already do and I just don't know it)? ]]> Native Lenses slothead http://www.mu-43.com/f38/why-does-oly-like-retracting-locking-lenses-46562/ Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN Art Lens Review http://www.mu-43.com/f38/sigma-60mm-f2-8-dn-art-lens-review-46551/ Tue, 21 May 2013 03:52:50 GMT Hi guys. Anyone seen this review (though, with korean text)? Looks like a great lens (again) from Sigma for the mirrorless system.

Here's the link: Gear for Image :: Sigma Art 60mm f2.8 DN vs Olympus 60mm f2.8 Macro

Sorry if this was posted already. :smile: ]]> Native Lenses idp69 http://www.mu-43.com/f38/sigma-60mm-f2-8-dn-art-lens-review-46551/ Which 50mm f1.4? http://www.mu-43.com/f40/50mm-f1-4-a-46540/ Tue, 21 May 2013 01:42:01 GMT I'm trying to save some money by buying a legacy lens. Here are my requirements:

1. Around $100
2. Smallish (it will be on my portable PM2)
3. At least f1.8, would pay more for 1.4 or 1.2
4. SHARP!

I've done some reading and have found a few 50mm f1.4s that I like: Olympus, Minolta, & Pentax. Any idea which of these would be sharpest? I've heard the Pentax but the Min & Oly seem easier to find. Any of the focus closer?

Also, for the Pentax I'd use an M42-m4/3s converter. OM-Mount converter for the Olympus. Any links to a high quality converter that isn't going to damage the mount on my beloved PM2 would be appreciated. Thank you! :) ]]> Adapted Lenses tjdean01 http://www.mu-43.com/f40/50mm-f1-4-a-46540/ Zeikos ZE-FL70 http://www.mu-43.com/f67/zeikos-ze-fl70-46536/ Tue, 21 May 2013 01:24:04 GMT Anyone out there using this flash. I'm looking at one right now for a decent price. It tilts, swivels, and the auto focus assist works on m4/3. ]]> Accessories Joltinjess http://www.mu-43.com/f67/zeikos-ze-fl70-46536/ Need advice on cheap Sigma lenses! http://www.mu-43.com/f38/need-advice-cheap-sigma-lenses-46525/ Mon, 20 May 2013 20:33:38 GMT I found cheap second hand Sigma lenses through a retailer. Sigma 19 and 30, both at f2.8 for 85€ piece, second hand. Are they worth anything? Which one should I order if I order? I found cheap second hand Sigma lenses through a retailer.

Sigma 19 and 30, both at f2.8 for 85€ piece, second hand.

Are they worth anything? Which one should I order if I order? ]]> Native Lenses Ramirez http://www.mu-43.com/f38/need-advice-cheap-sigma-lenses-46525/ <![CDATA[Tired of waiting for the "fast Olympus zoom"...]]> http://www.mu-43.com/f40/tired-waiting-fast-olympus-zoom-46520/ Mon, 20 May 2013 19:00:54 GMT ... so I'm now thinking of getting an adapted FT zoom instead.

More specifically the 14-54II.

My thinking is as follows: the only fast midrange zoom for :43: is the Panasonic 12-35. I have no reason to doubt it's a marvelous lens (haven't used it myself) but there are several drawbacks:

1) Cost; best price in Europe is more than 900 euros
2) I'm totally indiferent on OIS since I'll be using it on Olympus bodies; this is a feature I'd paying for and never using
3) Most serious of all: the focal range doesn't suit me very well.

I'd like more of a "walkaround" type of lens, certainly going to 50mm at the long end although I don't mind that much on the short end (14mm is fine). I guess Olympus shall have such a native lens at some point, but this could be by the end of the year and would cost perhaps more than the Panasonic.

So I was thinking. I can get a great used example of the 14-54II for 350-400 euro, including the adaptor. For the shooting I'm planning with it, breakneck AF speed is not critical. OTOH, the 14-54II is perhaps the fastest focusing FT lens available, and, if we believe Olympus' claims, FT lens AF is improved in the E-P5 already; and would improve even more in a future body.

For me getting this lens would allow me to replace both Sigmas (19mm/30mm) and probably make some money against its cost in the process. I know I'll sacrifice some AF speed but, from what I've seen, no IQ loss.

My concerns are twofold:

1) I have forgotten back/front focus issues since I abandoned DSLRs for mirrorless. Is there a chance there are focusing accuracy problems with this lens?
2) On a recent thread (http://www.mu-43.com/f40/olympus-zd-...g-again-46438/), Dara talked about reliability problems with the 12-60 when used with CD-AF cameras. Would this be a serious problem with the 14-54II too?

What do you guys think? ]]> Adapted Lenses With_Eyes_Unclouded http://www.mu-43.com/f40/tired-waiting-fast-olympus-zoom-46520/ Review: Grab Focus Lens Cover for Olympus 12mm f/2.0 http://www.mu-43.com/f38/review-grab-focus-lens-cover-olympus-12mm-f-2-0-a-46493/ Mon, 20 May 2013 14:05:47 GMT A short time back, Bravin Neff posted a thread concerning a product he has produced calls the "Grab Focus Lens Cover" See: http://www.mu-43.com/f38/protect-your-lens-45909/. The product concept is a simple one: The Grab Focus Lens Cover is a cover or skin for various Mu43 prime lenses that is intended to protect the lenses from damage. Nothing more, nothing less. Bravin is producing covers for the Olympus 12mm f/2.0, Olympus 45mm f/1.8, the Olympus 17mm f/1.8, the Panasonic 25mm f/ 1.4 and the Panasonic 20mm f/1.7. This review is for the Olympus 12mm f/2.0.

In the box

For the Olympus 12mm f/2.0, the box contains three (3) items. 1. A cover, 2. a small plastic ring, and 3. Instructions. The instructions are decent, thought installation is pretty intuitive. My suggestion to bravin would be the addition of material clarifying the role of the plastic ring for the Olympus 12mm and 17mm lenses.

Installing the Cover

Installing the cover on the Olympus 12mm f/2.0 (and the 17mm f/1.8) requires putting the lens in auto-focus mode with the focus snap-ring in the forward position. A plastic ring is then placed around the lens behind the snap focus ring in the channel that allows the focus ring to travel back to the MF position. This insures that when the cover is installed from the front, the focus ring is not pushed back into the manual focus mode, disabling autofocus. The camera can still be placed into manual focus mode, but this must be done through the menus as opposed to by snapping the focus ring back.

The cover is then installed easily over the lens by pushing it from front to back over the lens barrel. The cover itself is a plastic material and fits nicely over the lens. It is in most dimensions larger than the lens and has a strip of plush material on the interior which snugs up against the focus ring and holds the cover in place. When fitting the cover, this plush material comes in contact with the focus ring and establishes a very nice snug fit that takes just enough force to be positive without feeling overly tight or forced.



Cover installed with 46mm filter (Panasonic G5 with P14-45mm)

Fit and Finish

The fit overall is very precise and the cover does not in any way wobble or have play. Thanks to the precise fit and a very fine focus ring mechanism on the Olympus 12mm f/2.0, focusing with the cover on is very smooth and unhindered. The fit at the front of the cover is also quite precise, and it stops perfectly at the edge of the lens allowing filters to be attached normally. The fit at the back of the lens is also quite precise, leaving just about one millimeter of clearance from the base, which I assume helps with insuring that it does not foul the body.

The build quality is quite nice. The cover is significantly more rigid than I thought it would be. It appears to be quite durable. The color is black and the finish in normal use appears to be a semi-gloss; the color and finish are a nice complement to the black OMD EM-5 with which I use the 12mm f/2.0. The photographs in this article tends to show it as being a bit more shiny that it looks in practice, and this mostly attributable to the use of flash.

In Practice

I do not like pouches. While pouches are all very nice if you do not use your lenses much, I need ready access. I tend to shoot in some difficult and even dirty locations. I usually never put my bag or equipment on the ground. Messing around with pouches represents another potential point of failure for me. Dropping my lenses or anything else because I am trying to get a lens out of a pouch is not something I relish. I also tend towards minimalistic bags and pouches simply defeat this in too many ways. The idea of an integral cover that will protect my lens in the bag and on the camera body is therefore compelling.

With the 12mm it is possible to grip the lens firmly enough to remove the lens with the cover on. On the other hand, I have not been able to put the lens on with the cover in a positive enough manner to trust that I've really sent the mechanism home. It can be done, but may represent a risk. This is a small thing, and sliding the lens cover forward half and inch for both removal and installation is an easy, quick and intuitive operation and insures that the lens is properly seated/unseated and that one has a good grasp of the lens.

It should be noted that the cover has a small index mark that allows the orange dot on top of the lens at the rear to be seen. It is helpful for lining up the lens for installation, etc., but is really not required if one opts to install the lens while the cover is off or pushed a half an inch forward..

It should also be noted that with the Olympus 12mm f/2.0, the cover extends to the end of the lens barrel. While the fit is such that you can install filters, the OEM hood will not fit over the lens cover.

There are three possible solutions: 1. Trim the hood to the appropriate distance so that the hood can be installed; I ran this by Bravin and it seems this would not compromise the integrity of the product. I believe he is considering offering a model that allows for installation of the OEM hood; 2. Put a wider 46mm filter on the end that will allow the OEM hood to gain purchase. I don't recommend this, nor have I tested the idea. Frankly, I'd hate to find that it vignettes, and it would mean tracking down wide filters in an era where the thin filters are the easiest to find.

The third possible solution is one that fits with how I already use the lens. I use a 46mm to 52mm step-up ring. To that I affix 52mm filter. I then use a "Perfect" Hood for the Sigma Super Wide II 24mm f/2.8 lens See: Sigma Perfect Hood for Super Wide II 24mm f/2.8 lens on eBay!

This hood is made for a FF 24mm lens. When properly installed on the 12mm f/2.0 it does not vignette in any aspect ratio. For me then, this is a perfect setup to use this cover, and a lot less expensive. Since the hood removes very easily, it makes removal of the lens by partially removing the cover quite simple, and really not all that different than how I would do things normally.



Camera with 46-52mm step-up, 52mm filter and Sigma Perfect hood (Panasonic G5 with P14-45mm)

Discussion

I did take the cover on a shoot in an abandoned factory. I do not have the material from that outing processed yet, but this is shot in the same location.


While the idea of a hood protector may not be useful to some, I find it a relatively compelling proposition, especially in the conditions depicted above. I routinely shoot photos in difficult conditions like this - dirty at best and even a little toxic at worst. I sometimes get into tight places where there is a lot of rusty, twisted metal over which I have to climb or through which I must navigate. I also shoot landscapes and at least a couple of times per year I do some moderately difficult hiking to get to locations that are not exactly roadside attractions. I like to use my equipment and at times I am much less focused on the equipment and a little more focused on getting the shot. A little protection is really nice to have, especially where it does not get in the way and is simple and straightforward to use.

The 12mm is a favorite lens. Having a little extra protection for this lens is great. The cover does seem to seal the lens a little from foreign matter and while not weather sealing, it is better than nothing. The cover's tactile feel is slightly warmer to the touch and a little larger in terms of diameter than the 12mm's focus ring. To me it feels similar to the focus ring on the Sigma 19mm and 30mm, though a little wider - perfectly acceptable though not perhaps as satisfying (in theory) as the feel of cool metal. Yet this is the kind of thing I really do not notice in the field. When I am focusing the camera in pursuit of an image, the tactile feel of the lens simply does not tend to permeate the experience much - unless it somehow gets in the way. Like I said, I did take the cover shooting, and it did not register really at all other than that i was glad I had it.

What did register was that at the end of the shoot there was a fine dust on the camera and cover. I removed the lens, put a body cap on and wiped the body. For the lens I removed the cover and rinsed and dried it. I did not detect any dust on the lens beyond the front element (filter).

Another reason I like the cover is that compared to the silver 12mm, this makes the camera and lens a little less obtrusive. I routinely walk around in a city that is considered the sixth most dangerous in the country. Low profile is better. I will say that I consider it a benefit that it is black, and if I could have afforded the limited lens I'd have bought it. But if you are looking at this cover solely to turn you lens black, just buy a black lens. Other than the 12mm, Olympus and Panasonic sells them that way.

But if you want something that can provided a modicum of protection both from dings as well as foreign matter, and which has a nice tactile feel, this is a good product that is well thought out, fits well, and simply gets the job done.

Pros

1. Provides good protection from dings
2. May add a level of dust resistance
3. Removeable/washable
4. Nice build quality, nice feel
5. Matte black finish matches black EM-5 nicely

Cons

1. No provision for OEM hood in this version (this does not affect me in the least)
2. Best to remove it or push it forward when installing/removing lens (for me this is well worth the trip)
3. Manual Snap Focus is compromised, though MF remains available through menus.

I personally feel this is a great product. Overall it represents a simple concept that is nicely executed - it fills a need for some of us very well and too much should not be read into it. I do not worship my gear. But I do want to keep it nice without having necessarily to "baby" it.

Perhaps it is most similar to the idea of an LCD protector. If someone was selling a lens and stated that it had one of Bravin's covers on it "from day one," I'd almost certainly feel this was a bonus.

Thanks for reading

woof! ]]> Native Lenses woof http://www.mu-43.com/f38/review-grab-focus-lens-cover-olympus-12mm-f-2-0-a-46493/ An L-Bracket for the Olympus Grip http://www.mu-43.com/f67/l-bracket-olympus-grip-46487/ Mon, 20 May 2013 10:41:40 GMT Does anyone know of a grip designed to fit the HLD-6 Olympus grip?

I've been studying the RRS L-bracket contribution, but it can't be used with the HLD-6 (which obviously provides more battery-supported life).I have seen a couple L-brackets that will fit somewhat, but in both cases the "L" side does not come up high enough on the side of the camera to center the camera's optical centerline over the tripod centerline.

There are probably methods to accommodate this by using an assortment of fixtures but that is just not as handy as a one-piece solution. ]]> Accessories slothead http://www.mu-43.com/f67/l-bracket-olympus-grip-46487/ Any experience with Samyang 500mm f/6.3 reflex lens? http://www.mu-43.com/f40/any-experience-samyang-500mm-f-6-3-reflex-lens-46486/ Mon, 20 May 2013 10:21:58 GMT Hello,

Anyone have already used the Samyang 50mm f/6.3 (or the f/8 version) on a micro 4/3 body?

Here's a link to the specs:

http://www.samyang-lens.co.uk/samyan...rror-lens.html

I believe it would not be best optics than most native micro 4/3, but is it acceptable for bird photography.
I own a Panasonic 100-300mm lens but sometimes I need more than that to get closer to some species. ]]> Adapted Lenses jrsilva http://www.mu-43.com/f40/any-experience-samyang-500mm-f-6-3-reflex-lens-46486/ Super Telephoto for M4/3 (OMD-EM5) http://www.mu-43.com/f40/super-telephoto-m4-3-omd-em5-46484/ Mon, 20 May 2013 08:15:38 GMT Just wondering what options (old or new) are there for Super Telephoto lenses?
Preferably, full-frame (adaptable), prime and non-SLR (as I'm hoping for something small) ]]> Adapted Lenses hithere http://www.mu-43.com/f40/super-telephoto-m4-3-omd-em5-46484/ PL25 1.4 with extension tubes? http://www.mu-43.com/f38/pl25-1-4-extension-tubes-46472/ Mon, 20 May 2013 02:06:56 GMT I currently don't have any macro capabilities, but I do have a PL25 1.4. Has anyone tried it out with extension tubes? Any shots you,can post here? ]]> Native Lenses scottz http://www.mu-43.com/f38/pl25-1-4-extension-tubes-46472/ M. Zuiko Digital ED 75-300 ƒ4.8-6.7 II Image Thread http://www.mu-43.com/f38/m-zuiko-digital-ed-75-300-4-8-6-7-ii-image-thread-46465/ Mon, 20 May 2013 00:30:19 GMT Disclaimer: I'm not and audubon/birder, or what not & I make no claims to be.

But it was fun trying! :smile:


Egret by RedTail_Panther, on Flickr ]]> Native Lenses RT_Panther http://www.mu-43.com/f38/m-zuiko-digital-ed-75-300-4-8-6-7-ii-image-thread-46465/ Owners of the Oly 9-18...how do you like your lens? http://www.mu-43.com/f38/owners-oly-9-18-how-do-you-like-your-lens-46462/ Sun, 19 May 2013 23:31:04 GMT Hi guys,

For the past year I've been trying to decide on a lightweight travel alternative to my bulky DSLR setup. My main go-to lenses have been UWA zooms for years and years. First the Sigma 10-20 then the Tokina 11-16 on crop DSLRs, then the Canon 17-40L and currently the 16-35L II on full frame.

I'm not interested in the Pany 7-14 because it's too big and it doesn't allow screw-in filters.

That leaves me with the Sony NEX-6 + 10-18 or an OM-D + 9-18. At first I was hesitant about the 9-18 because it's slow at the long end (I've been shooting f2.8s for years, going down an f4 constant was going to be bad enough, but 4-5.6 was a hard sell) and because it's not wide enough. But...I'm more and more convinced that 9mm is wide enough and I can deal with the slow long end because the IBIS in the OM-D is so damn good. Plus, I like the body and the 45 1.8 (the only other lens I'll be getting), so OVERALL I think it'd be a great package.

Still...I'd like to get your feedback...how do you like your 9-18? Specifically when it comes to sharpness, easily correctable distortion and CA?

Thanks! ]]> Native Lenses LowriderS10 http://www.mu-43.com/f38/owners-oly-9-18-how-do-you-like-your-lens-46462/ Will you get a focus peaking camera? http://www.mu-43.com/f40/will-you-get-focus-peaking-camera-46457/ Sun, 19 May 2013 22:06:36 GMT The Olympus E-P5 and Panasonic G6 are the first two camera's in the MFT world to have real focus peaking. I'm curious as to the level of interest for fans of adapted lenses.

]]> Adapted Lenses RnR http://www.mu-43.com/f40/will-you-get-focus-peaking-camera-46457/ Anyone using Domke F-5XB ruggedwear version? http://www.mu-43.com/f67/anyone-using-domke-f-5xb-ruggedwear-version-46456/ Sun, 19 May 2013 21:50:24 GMT I am interested in buying one of these. I am looking at one on Amazon but the dimensions given are different to another 5-XB. I just wondered whether anyone who has one of the ruggedwear versions could kindly confirm the size for me.
The dimensions given are
Product Dimensions: 17.8 x 33 x 25.4 cm (ruggedwear version)
Domke F-5XB Shoulder and Belt RuggedWear Bag: Amazon.co.uk: Camera & Photo

another versions dimensions are
Product Dimensions: 26.7 x 11.4 x 16.5 cm
Domke F-5XB Shoulder Belt Bag - Brown: Amazon.co.uk: Camera & Photo

It just seems a bit odd to me, maybe a mistake. I would just like to make sure before I go ahead and order one.
Thanks ]]> Accessories DaveyA http://www.mu-43.com/f67/anyone-using-domke-f-5xb-ruggedwear-version-46456/ <![CDATA[Any comparisons with the Sigma 19mm 2.8 DN against the 17mm 1.8 & 20mm 1.7?]]> http://www.mu-43.com/f38/any-comparisons-sigma-19mm-2-8-dn-against-17mm-1-8-20mm-1-7-a-46454/ Sun, 19 May 2013 21:06:47 GMT I'm just wondering how the Sigma 19mm stacks up against the 17mm 1.8 and 20mm 1.7? Does anyone who owns the 19mm and either of the other lenses done any comparisons? Thanks for any feedback! ]]> Native Lenses Jonathan F/2 http://www.mu-43.com/f38/any-comparisons-sigma-19mm-2-8-dn-against-17mm-1-8-20mm-1-7-a-46454/ Panasonic 14/2.5 + GWC1 wide-angle converter? http://www.mu-43.com/f38/panasonic-14-2-5-gwc1-wide-angle-converter-46440/ Sun, 19 May 2013 18:31:20 GMT I've seen a few people with the Panasonic 14/2.5 and the DMW-GWC1 wide-angle converter.

I'm wondering if anybody has had a chance to compare it to either the Olympus 12/2 or the Panasonic 12-35/2.8 at the wide end.

Yes, I know it's just a conversion lens, but neither of the other 2 options are exceptional at that focal length for landscapes (smeary corners), so if the 14/2.5 + GWC1 combo is reasonably close, I'd be interested in giving it a try. I'd also be curious to know how much the AoV shrinks once you correct for the additional barrel distortion from the GWC1. Now that my goto 12mm lens (ZD 12-60) has failed again, I'm trying to gauge the alternatives.

Thanks! ]]> Native Lenses dhazeghi http://www.mu-43.com/f38/panasonic-14-2-5-gwc1-wide-angle-converter-46440/ Olympus ZD 12-60 AF motor failing... again http://www.mu-43.com/f40/olympus-zd-12-60-af-motor-failing-again-46438/ Sun, 19 May 2013 18:19:08 GMT I was off hiking yesterday with my E-M5 and trusty ZD 12-60 (the 4/3 lens). At one point, I noticed the lens was having an extremely hard time achieving focus, sometimes failing entirely. In those cases, the motor would chatter away for 8-10 seconds before giving up. I tried it again this morning and it now entirely fails to achieve focus, and when it gives up, it makes a whining noise for several seconds.

I had the AF motor on this same lens repaired about 18 months ago after it failed entirely. I wasn't thrilled then, but it was a 3.5 year old lens that I'd used quite heavily, so I figured it was just bad luck on my part. This time, the lens hasn't even been used all that much. It could be that I have really bad luck, but I'm beginning to think that the constant adjusting required by the CDAF algorithm has something to do with the AF motor's premature failure.

Either way, a $900 lens requiring 2 $300 repairs within 18 months of each other is not making me very happy. ]]> Adapted Lenses dhazeghi http://www.mu-43.com/f40/olympus-zd-12-60-af-motor-failing-again-46438/ Focal length confusion? http://www.mu-43.com/f40/focal-length-confusion-46436/ Sun, 19 May 2013 16:41:20 GMT For my first post on the forum I'm having a blond moment, so forgive me.

Having had some very good success with adapted lenses on my Fuji X-E1 I'm thinking about getting an adapter to try my Minolta MD lenses on my EPM1. Lets say I'm mounting my 50mm f1.8; am I effectively putting a 100mm lens on in 35mm terms, given MFT has an effect crop factor of 2? ]]> Adapted Lenses chalkie http://www.mu-43.com/f40/focal-length-confusion-46436/ Review: Polymer Works Grab Focus Lens Cover (45/1.8) http://www.mu-43.com/f67/review-polymer-works-grab-focus-lens-cover-45-1-8-a-46427/ Sun, 19 May 2013 02:20:00 GMT During the past week, I've been trying out the Grab Focus lens cover for the Oly 45/1.8 lens. It arrived with a professional-looking, illustrated instruction sheet that includes simple instructions for installing and removing the cover, along with a few tips for mounting and dismounting the lens with Grab Focus attached.

My first reaction upon holding the cover in my hand, was "Wow, this is really nice!" Even nicer than it looks in the detailed photos Bravin posted in his "Protect Your Lens" thread:

http://www.mu-43.com/f38/protect-you...09/#post447707

The Grab Focus is lightweight and nicely made with a strip of very low-pile, adhesive-backed faux velvet on the inside to assist with grasping the focus ring. The cover slipped easily onto my lens, and I think it looks quite nice on my silver E-PM2 with or without my black hood.





First test, manual focusing: with just a tiny bit of pressure on the focus ring (the ribbed area of the cover), manual focus feels and works fine. On my first attempt, I used more pressure than necessary, so manual focus was a little jerky. But within a second or two, I knew just how little pressure to apply, and manual focus worked very smoothly.

Next up, mounting and dismounting the lens with Grab Focus attached. This test worried me a bit, as my naked 45/1.8 is particularly difficult to mount and dismount. And sadly, despite Bravin's excellent instructions, I've yet to master either task.

When mounting the lens (cover installed), the lens sticks about half-way (as it does when naked), at which point I stop, get a better grip on the lens/cover and try to complete the mount. Unfortunately, the cover turns while the lens does not. When dismounting the lens (cover installed), each time I feel like the lens will disengage at any moment. I do manage to move the lens just enough that the camera can't identify the aperture, etc., but the cover continues to turn without the lens.

The good news is that I've found I don't have to completely remove the cover to mount or dismount the lens. If I pull the cover forward enough that I can grasp the bare lens base, I can mount and dismount the lens with the Grab Focus on the lens. Further, I don't change lenses much, so even if I had to completely remove the Grab Focus to mount/dismount the lens, it wouldn't be a deal breaker for me. :smile:

Even though the faux velvet strip inside the Grab Focus is very low-pile, it does inevitably pick up a little dust. The velvet is so smooth that a quick wipe around the inside of the cover with my index finger easily takes care of it.

I really like the Grab Focus. I left it on my lens all week, only removing it for various tests, and I feel my 45/1.8 is well protected from dings and scrapes. My rating: I'll be keeping it on my lens! 4 stars out of 5. ]]> Accessories twokatmew http://www.mu-43.com/f67/review-polymer-works-grab-focus-lens-cover-45-1-8-a-46427/ Padded Lens Holders from the Bargain Bin http://www.mu-43.com/f67/padded-lens-holders-bargain-bin-46417/ Sat, 18 May 2013 22:15:27 GMT I needed something to hold and pad my PL45mm and Zuiko 9-18mm inside my camera backpack, so that they'd be protected and not try to fall out.

I'm not sure what made me think of it, but on checking online and doing some measuring, I found that these things are just the right diameter (only for the barrel of the 9-18):



And, if doesn't work out, I can always use them to hold beer cans. :drinks:

Next step is to make some sort of removable attachment for holding them in the backpack. ]]> Accessories scott http://www.mu-43.com/f67/padded-lens-holders-bargain-bin-46417/ Lowepro Flipside Sport 10L AW http://www.mu-43.com/f67/lowepro-flipside-sport-10l-aw-46415/ Sat, 18 May 2013 21:22:12 GMT This is my hiking bag setup.

What's in it:
  • Olympus OMD w/ Black Rapid strap
  • Panasonic 12-35 f/2.8 (mounted)
  • Panasonic 35-100 f/2.8
  • Olympus 9-18 f/4-5.6
  • MeFoto Backpacker tripod
  • Camelback hydration bladder

There's room for plenty more, but this is what I'm willing to carry. :)





]]> Accessories Heavy Doody http://www.mu-43.com/f67/lowepro-flipside-sport-10l-aw-46415/ Ona Union Street http://www.mu-43.com/f67/ona-union-street-46414/ Sat, 18 May 2013 20:58:36 GMT This is my daily bag that I take to and from work everyday. Probably not a bag I'd use for a photo walk.

What's in there:
  • Olympus OMD w/ Black Rapid strap
  • Panasonic 12-35 f/2.8 (mounted)
  • Panasonic 35-100 f/2.8
  • Olympus 45 f/1.8
  • Variable ND filter
  • iPad Mini
  • Moleskine Evernote notebook





]]> Accessories Heavy Doody http://www.mu-43.com/f67/ona-union-street-46414/ Oly 12-50 vs Oly 14-150 http://www.mu-43.com/f38/oly-12-50-vs-oly-14-150-a-46412/ Sat, 18 May 2013 19:47:07 GMT Hi all,

I own an E-pl5 and have the 14-42 and 14-150; I'm wondering if I could buy the 12-50 and use it as an all rounder and the difference in IQ, if any, between the 12-50 and 14-150 which I find a good lens. ]]> Native Lenses elandel http://www.mu-43.com/f38/oly-12-50-vs-oly-14-150-a-46412/ Novoflex MiniConnect mounts ??? http://www.mu-43.com/f67/novoflex-miniconnect-mounts-46400/ Sat, 18 May 2013 09:08:23 GMT Has anybody ever tried the MiniConnect mounts from Novoflex? Novoflex - MiniConnect (http://www.novoflex.com/en/products/camera-support-systems/quick-release-systems/miniconnect/) Novoflex - MiniConnect MR (http://www.novoflex.com/en/products/camera-support-systems/quick-release-systems/miniconnect-mr/) I am currently looking for a smaller/lighter quick release system for my m4/3 bodies. These look good but too expensive to just experiment. If you have used them or even seen them in person please let me know what you think. Thanks! Has anybody ever tried the MiniConnect mounts from Novoflex?

Novoflex - MiniConnect

Novoflex - MiniConnect MR

I am currently looking for a smaller/lighter quick release system for my m4/3 bodies. These look good but too expensive to just experiment. If you have used them or even seen them in person please let me know what you think. Thanks! ]]> Accessories speedandstyle http://www.mu-43.com/f67/novoflex-miniconnect-mounts-46400/ Quick look at Gariz Half-case for the OM-D http://www.mu-43.com/f67/quick-look-gariz-half-case-om-d-46396/ Sat, 18 May 2013 04:12:18 GMT Hi all,

This is my first time doing anything like this, but I thought I'd give it a go. Not really a full-fledged review - just a look, and maybe a minor rant :biggrin:


Any thoughts or comments are appreciated!

Daros ]]> Accessories darosk http://www.mu-43.com/f67/quick-look-gariz-half-case-om-d-46396/ Dirty brush - how to clean? http://www.mu-43.com/f67/dirty-brush-how-clean-46387/ Fri, 17 May 2013 23:39:24 GMT I have managed to make my lens cleaning brush dirty somehow - whenever I try to brush a lens with it, it leaves an unfortunate film which has to be removed with a lens cleaning cloth. It must, I think, have come about either by my touching the head of the brush when removing it from my pocket or by blowing on it to try to get dust out of it. Either way, is it possible to clean it? If so, how? I have managed to make my lens cleaning brush dirty somehow - whenever I try to brush a lens with it, it leaves an unfortunate film which has to be removed with a lens cleaning cloth. It must, I think, have come about either by my touching the head of the brush when removing it from my pocket or by blowing on it to try to get dust out of it. Either way, is it possible to clean it? If so, how? ]]> Accessories jamespetts http://www.mu-43.com/f67/dirty-brush-how-clean-46387/ Focusing problem with Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II http://www.mu-43.com/f38/focusing-problem-olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-75-300mm-f4-8-6-7-ii-46386/ Fri, 17 May 2013 23:30:05 GMT I bought this lens recently. I just noticed that in manual focus mode no matter which way I turn the focus ring, the focus moves in the same direction. I think the lens is defective, but I just wanted to check whether there was any camera/firmware issue which would cause this. I am using the lens with EPL1. Thanks Ninad I bought this lens recently. I just noticed that in manual focus mode no matter which way I turn the focus ring, the focus moves in the same direction. I think the lens is defective, but I just wanted to check whether there was any camera/firmware issue which would cause this. I am using the lens with EPL1.

Thanks
Ninad ]]> Native Lenses ninad http://www.mu-43.com/f38/focusing-problem-olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-75-300mm-f4-8-6-7-ii-46386/ <![CDATA[purchasing a wifi card for "tethered" shooting.]]> http://www.mu-43.com/f67/purchasing-wifi-card-tethered-shooting-46361/ Fri, 17 May 2013 11:16:44 GMT I'm using an g5 and i'm looking for an wifi card to trransfer mi pics directly to mi ipad as use for (semi) thetered shooting. I'm doubting between card and wether to purchase one. eye-fi and transcend (in europe sandisk eye-fi), only transfer jpg. But i mostly only shoot in RAW to be able to tweek it better later on. Can i shoot example: Raw + JPG (low) and transfer the jpg to the ipad?

And what card do you reccommend. eyfi 4g is about 30 euro and 8g about€ 55 both only in class 4 available)

Trancend 16G (class 10) ca. 50 euro an 32g about € 75.

p.s. does anyone know if the lumix link wil work with G5 and eye-fi / wifi card?

Other options for. semi thetered shooting are welcome! ]]> Accessories kleinekeep http://www.mu-43.com/f67/purchasing-wifi-card-tethered-shooting-46361/ Using ND filters on primes http://www.mu-43.com/f38/using-nd-filters-primes-46357/ Fri, 17 May 2013 09:00:40 GMT Hi All, Trying to learn - I have an OMD and the following native primes ( 25,45,60,75) which I really like. When using the 75 in bright sunlight I tend to max out or get very close to 4000 shutter speed - when using a variable ND filter will the camera automatically compensate to how much I vary the filter? If I put a 10 stop presumably I can get long exposures....? sorry novice with ND but I think I need them on these primes allowing shallow DOF in bright sunlight. - thanks for your help Hi All,

Trying to learn - I have an OMD and the following native primes ( 25,45,60,75) which I really like. When using the 75 in bright sunlight I tend to max out or get very close to 4000 shutter speed - when using a variable ND filter will the camera automatically compensate to how much I vary the filter?

If I put a 10 stop presumably I can get long exposures....?

sorry novice with ND but I think I need them on these primes allowing shallow DOF in bright sunlight. - thanks for your help ]]> Native Lenses Petrus61 http://www.mu-43.com/f38/using-nd-filters-primes-46357/ How easy is it to repair OM bayonet mount? http://www.mu-43.com/f40/how-easy-repair-om-bayonet-mount-46356/ Fri, 17 May 2013 08:12:52 GMT Problem: Bargain lens [Sigma 135mm f2.8-64mm "Pantel" in OM mount] has one of its little levers [there are two on the outside of the lens barrel] for lens mounting non-functional — no spring action [lever just flops around in the slot] and I am loath to mount it on my OM-m43 adaptor to test out the rest of its functioning. I have a 3x Vivitar tele-extender in OM mount which I am prepared to sacrifice for parts if a repair is relatively easy for my friendly local lens mechanic/techie. I can only see him on Monday. Just wonder if anyone else has had similar problems and what the prognosis is. Thanks in anticipation. ]]> Adapted Lenses iGonzoid http://www.mu-43.com/f40/how-easy-repair-om-bayonet-mount-46356/ Wide angle lens for travel http://www.mu-43.com/f38/wide-angle-lens-travel-46343/ Fri, 17 May 2013 01:25:10 GMT Hi all.. Sorry to start another lens suggestion thread. But I am really confused and would like your opinion.

Planning to visit SFO, Lake Tahoe & Muir Woods later this month and possibly NY city later.

I don't have a wide angle for the Mu-43 kit and like to hear from you on what you will choose from below for OM-D E-M5

Option 1 :
Panasonic 7-14

Option 2 :
Panasonic 14 and Samyang/Rokinon 7.5 fish eye (or just 14 is enough? , I like the 7.5 fish defished shots a lot)

Not interested in Oly 9-18

Current kit
E-M5
Pana 20
Oly 45
Oly 75

Thanks for checking and like to hear from you :smile:

EDIT:
Things changed and we (read wife :smile:) changed the plan and now decided to go to Key West, FL. We are leaving this Wednesday (May 22nd).

Now the question is, Is a weather sealed lens required for the weather in FL ?:confused:
If not, I will just get the 9-18 and of course, will have to pay the non-discounted price with extra price for next day delivery :mad: ]]> Native Lenses bipinsnair http://www.mu-43.com/f38/wide-angle-lens-travel-46343/ First test with Olymus 45mm whent crazy! http://www.mu-43.com/f38/first-test-olymus-45mm-whent-crazy-46331/ Thu, 16 May 2013 21:52:57 GMT So I was going to take some sample shoots for the first time with my Oly45mm and maybe do a little unbox and demo video when a beaver decided to join me and the dog. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBGcCSNTcPo A funny side note was that another dude was there trying to take stills of the beaver. He stood on the other side of the river with his HUGE Canon L lens and was probably weeping because the beaver choose the side I was standing on :) So I was going to take some sample shoots for the first time with my Oly45mm and maybe do a little unbox and demo video when a beaver decided to join me and the dog.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBGcCSNTcPo

A funny side note was that another dude was there trying to take stills of the beaver. He stood on the other side of the river with his HUGE Canon L lens and was probably weeping because the beaver choose the side I was standing on :) ]]> Native Lenses Lobbamobba http://www.mu-43.com/f38/first-test-olymus-45mm-whent-crazy-46331/ Best Wildlife lens options? http://www.mu-43.com/f38/best-wildlife-lens-options-46330/ Thu, 16 May 2013 21:40:58 GMT What lens(es) might you recommend for good wildlife/nature shooting with a E-PL2. Being new to m4/3rds, I'm not yet familiar with available lenses for this purpose. I currently have a 14-42 II and a 40-150mm lens. Thanks. ]]> Native Lenses RobertS http://www.mu-43.com/f38/best-wildlife-lens-options-46330/ <![CDATA[Olympus "body jacket" for E-PL5/E-PL6]]> http://www.mu-43.com/f67/olympus-body-jacket-e-pl5-e-pl6-46328/ Thu, 16 May 2013 21:30:09 GMT In case you're not the creative type or you're just low on inspiration, Olympus has helpfully provided some great examples of what can be done with this: While it's possible that (like the E-PL6) this new accessory will be released only in Japan, I'm sure that won't slow anyone down from getting their hands on one. I look forward to bookmarking the "Show: Decorated Body Jacket" thread that is sure to pop up soon. :biggrin:]]> Lost in all the hype around the recent introduction of the E-P5 and the E-PL6 I somehow missed the announcement of a new white "body jacket" for the E-PL6 (and E-PL5/E-PM2). The new jacket "covers the camera's grip and can be used to paint over or to attach stickers and other decorations." This is your blank slate to bedazzle your camera.



In case you're not the creative type or you're just low on inspiration, Olympus has helpfully provided some great examples of what can be done with this:



While it's possible that (like the E-PL6) this new accessory will be released only in Japan, I'm sure that won't slow anyone down from getting their hands on one. I look forward to bookmarking the "Show: Decorated Body Jacket" thread that is sure to pop up soon. :biggrin: ]]> Accessories DeeJayK http://www.mu-43.com/f67/olympus-body-jacket-e-pl5-e-pl6-46328/ PL 25mm and 45mm 1.8 a great combo http://www.mu-43.com/f38/pl-25mm-45mm-1-8-great-combo-46322/ Thu, 16 May 2013 19:58:51 GMT Long story short, I got a G5 on Amazon last week during lightning which I'm now returning because it irks me for only one reason. Setting AF point is 2 steps and not really intuitive without the LCD and with the lcd on my nose keeps hitting it. Otherwise it's a great camera Fast to Focus and superb IQ

I have been out of M4/3 for a while since the E-P2 and gave up on it due to shadow noise in high ISO which is so much better now. Have an OM-D & 17mm 1.8 coming tomorrow so can't wait to get to it...

These are first couple of shots with both lenses... Just got the 25mm yesterday and WOW.. Fast to focus and the build is amazing.





Manually Focused
45mm


45mm


45mm


45mm
]]> Native Lenses ahuyevshi http://www.mu-43.com/f38/pl-25mm-45mm-1-8-great-combo-46322/ Adapter for Adaptall2 lens? http://www.mu-43.com/f40/adapter-adaptall2-lens-46313/ Thu, 16 May 2013 17:26:06 GMT Who makes a m43 adapter to mount an Adaptall2 lens on the cam? Who makes a m43 adapter to mount an Adaptall2 lens on the cam? ]]> Adapted Lenses lovemyoly http://www.mu-43.com/f40/adapter-adaptall2-lens-46313/ <![CDATA[Think Tank Mirrorless Mover 10 - Mini Review & Images]]> http://www.mu-43.com/f67/think-tank-mirrorless-mover-10-mini-review-images-46307/ Thu, 16 May 2013 16:04:26 GMT My MM10 just arrived, and when I saw how small it is, I immediately thought I'd have to send it back. But ... the bag is nicely made of quality materials and clearly well designed, so I decided to see what gear I could fit inside and how accessible it would be. As it turns out, I can fit a lot in this tiny bag! So ... I just cut the tags off. :2thumbs:

I moved the divider so I could just fit my E-M5 with 17/1.8 mounted sideways and my Samsung GS3 & case in the phone pocket. That leaves a narrow space for a few small accessories. Just guessing, I could probably fit the FL-300R with the kit flash in that space. The top of the case still closes easily with the lens cap from my 14/2.5 in the pocket inside the lid. Note that my E-M5 is wearing the RRS BOEM5 plate. In this orientation, there might even be room for the matching grip and L-plate.


If I remove my GS3 (too tall) and insert the camera lens down, there's still room for the 45/1.8 beneath the mounted 17/1.8 ... or the camera with 40-150R mounted and bayonet hood reversed.


With the 40-150R & reversed hood mounted, the 14/2.5 fits sideways in the bottom of the space to the right of the pocket, leaving more space on top.


And finally, here's the case next to the E-M5 with RRS plate & 40-150R/hood mounted, along with my GS3 in its case.


In addition to the main compartments, there are two side pockets on the outside of the bag. The right side pocket is stretchy, while the left side pocket is gusseted. Inside the front zip pocket, there's yet another pocket that contains a detachable rain shield. With or without the shield stowed inside, there's room for a few small accessories.

The MM20 (next size up) is quite close in size to my Domke F-5XB, so I'm glad I managed to fit so much into this tiny little bag. This is my first Think Tank bag, and so far, I'm very, very impressed ... even moreso considering the bag currently sells for ~$45. :biggrin: :2thumbs: ]]> Accessories twokatmew http://www.mu-43.com/f67/think-tank-mirrorless-mover-10-mini-review-images-46307/ Panny 25 1.4 price increase? Now $549 ? http://www.mu-43.com/f38/panny-25-1-4-price-increase-now-549-a-46306/ Thu, 16 May 2013 16:00:22 GMT Just noticed it went from $499 to $549. When did this happen? Anyone know if this is temporary? Just noticed it went from $499 to $549.

When did this happen? Anyone know if this is temporary? ]]> Native Lenses broncophil http://www.mu-43.com/f38/panny-25-1-4-price-increase-now-549-a-46306/ Looking for a 28mm on OMD http://www.mu-43.com/f40/looking-28mm-omd-46304/ Thu, 16 May 2013 15:08:19 GMT By a quick search, the olympus 28mm 2.8/3.5 seems to be a good choice, also the minolta md rokkor 28mm 2.8. Now I have
the 45mm 1.8 and need something a bit wider, and as close to the 50mm equivalent as possible, so 56mm should be OK.

I'm just looking for a cheap getaway drug until I can buy the panasonic 25mm 1.4

Those who have the olympus 2.8 or 3.5, are you happy with it?, is it sharp enough at 2.8/3.5 ]]> Adapted Lenses Hingo http://www.mu-43.com/f40/looking-28mm-omd-46304/ Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Sony in Spreadsheet ... http://www.mu-43.com/f40/canon-nikon-pentax-sony-spreadsheet-46301/ Thu, 16 May 2013 14:27:05 GMT ... was asked of me to be published for easy comparison in terms of size, weight and price (relative to recent prices since I don't update my info every day or week). So here they are, all prices are taken from the Italian Online Market or converted to euro from the USA market where not specified the price in euro (ex: $).

Canon & Nikon mounts (including Third Party Manufacturers) that are Full Frame compatible only:



Addendum: the lenses written in black bold and italic have some sort of weather proofing (official info).

Pentax lenses:



Sony lenses:



Addendum: the lenses written in bold are compatible with Full Frame mount and the one written in italic are APS-C only lenses.

Please note that some information may not be complete or even correct about the availability and price in the European, and specifically Italy, market.

I hope this helps in some way people who need or want to make a choices or comparisons.

Respect Ovidiu. ]]> Adapted Lenses RaZZ3R http://www.mu-43.com/f40/canon-nikon-pentax-sony-spreadsheet-46301/ Oly 75/1.8 for wildlife? http://www.mu-43.com/f38/oly-75-1-8-wildlife-46295/ Thu, 16 May 2013 11:29:40 GMT Hey,

I know, another "is that lens right for me thread". :-)

But there is a specific question some of you might know an answer to. So here it goes: In August I am lucky enough to go on a RV and hiking trip through Alaska. Of course I am going to bring my camera with me for some nice landscape and wildlife pictures. The question is, would the 75 (which I do not have right now) be ok for wildlife shots? Of course, a longer lens would be even preferable but the 75 is the longest native lens (while still having a wide aperture) as one can get right now.

I do have the 75-300 but am afraid that quite often it will be to dark for the lens. That's why I am leaning towards the 75. The plan would be to sap pictures and crop in post.

As for the significant price of the lens: I would of course use the lens later on for other opportunities but those would probably not justify the investment.

So, any thoughts on the 75 for wildlife (e.g., moos, grizzlies, ...) as well as the occasional landscape and portrait shot (mind you, I also have the 60mm). ]]> Native Lenses quatchi http://www.mu-43.com/f38/oly-75-1-8-wildlife-46295/ EVF Extension Cord http://www.mu-43.com/f67/evf-extension-cord-46279/ Thu, 16 May 2013 00:50:25 GMT Here's an interesting idea: What kind of connector is the Olympus EVF connector, and is there such a thing as an extension cord (male and female with 6' or so cable) that could drive the EVF that far away from the camera body? The questions come from an idea of hoisting (or lowering) a camera on an extension monopod-like pole and still having a view finder to see the composition. ]]> Accessories slothead http://www.mu-43.com/f67/evf-extension-cord-46279/ zoom lens advice/suggestions http://www.mu-43.com/f38/zoom-lens-advice-suggestions-46274/ Wed, 15 May 2013 22:42:48 GMT i don't have very steady hands. since i've been using panasonics or a NEX up until a few days ago, i've been shooting with stabilized lenses or tripods at below 1/100 or sometimes even 1/150.

i've been using my new E-PM2 with the kit lens, and last night i tried it with some legacy lenses. my success rate with the heavier legacy lenses wasn't high even with IBIS (canon FD 50 f/1.4 and canon FD 35 f/2), and i had to REALLY work to get the few that came out. i had better success with the lighter c mount lenses, but still underwhelming as around 60% came out sharp.

i was interested in the oly 40-150 lens, not just because of its price but because of its lightness and the fact that i often read oly cameras focus a little faster and correct for oly lenses. my concern is that the IBIS may not be strong enough to counteract my shaky hands. thoughts?

then there are 2 panasonic lenses i'm also considering - the 45-150 and the 45-175, which seems pretty neat overall. i'm wondering how bad the lack of in-camera correction is with these lenses. anyone use either of them on an oly who doesn't do much processing? ]]> Native Lenses pcake http://www.mu-43.com/f38/zoom-lens-advice-suggestions-46274/